CSSEC: An adaptive approach integrating consensus and specific self-expressive coefficients for multi-omics cancer subtyping

被引:0
作者
Cai, Yueyi [1 ]
Zhou, Nan [1 ]
Zhao, Junran [1 ]
Li, Weihua [1 ]
Wang, Shunfang [1 ]
机构
[1] Yunnan Univ, Sch Informat Sci & Engn, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Kunming 650504, Yunnan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multi-omics data integration; Subspace clustering; Cancer subtyping; Survival analysis; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ymeth.2025.01.016
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Cancer is a complex and heterogeneous disease, and accurate cancer subtyping can significantly improve patient survival rates. The complexity of cancer spans multiple omics levels, and analyzing multi-omics data for cancer subtyping has become a major focus of research. However, extracting complementary information from different omics data sources and adaptively integrating them remains a major challenge. To address this, we proposed an adaptive approach integrating consensus and specific self-expressive coefficients for multi-omics cancer subtyping (CSSEC). First, independent self-expressive networks are applied to each omics to calculate coefficient matrices to measure patient similarity. Then, two feature graph convolutional network modules capture consensus and specific similarity features using the topK relevant features. Finally, the multi-omics self-expression coefficient matrix is constructed by consensus and specific similarity features. Furthermore, joint consistency and disparity constraints are applied to regularize the fusion of the self-expressive coefficients. Experimental results demonstrate that CSSEC outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods in survival analysis. Moreover, case studies on kidney cancer confirm that the cancer subtypes identified by CSSEC are biologically significant. The complete code can be available at https://github.com/ykxhs/CSSEC.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 33
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Garraway L.A., Lander E.S., Lessons from the cancer genome, Cell, 153, 1, pp. 17-37, (2013)
[2]  
Griffin M.R., Bergstralh E.J., Coffey R.J., Beart R.W., Melton L.J., Predictors of survival after curative resection of carcinoma of the colon and rectum, Cancer, 60, 9, pp. 2318-2324, (1987)
[3]  
Rappoport N., Shamir R., Multi-omic and multi-view clustering algorithms: review and cancer benchmark, Nucleic Acids Res., 46, 20, pp. 10546-10562, (2018)
[4]  
Huang S.J., Et al., More is better: recent progress in multi-omics data integration methods, Front. Genet., 8, (2017)
[5]  
Hirano S., Et al., Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes, Nature, 578, pp. 82-93, (2020)
[6]  
Subramanian I., Verma S., Kumar S., Jere A., Anamika K., Multi-omics data integration, interpretation, and its application, Bioinform. Biol. Insights, 14, (2020)
[7]  
Sun Q., Cheng L., Meng A., Ge S., Chen J., Zhang L., Gong P., Sadln: self-attention based deep learning network of integrating multi-omics data for cancer subtype recognition, Front. Genet., 13, (2023)
[8]  
Ouyang D., Liang Y., Li L., Ai N., Lu S., Yu M., Liu X., Xie S., Integration of multi-omics data using adaptive graph learning and attention mechanism for patient classification and biomarker identification, Comput. Biol. Med., 164, (2023)
[9]  
Kuang Y., Xie M., Zhao Z., Deng D., Bao E., Multi-view contrastive clustering for cancer subtyping using fully and weakly paired multi-omics data, Methods, (2024)
[10]  
Duan R., Gao L., Gao Y., Hu Y., Xu H., Huang M., Song K., Wang H., Dong Y., Jiang C., Et al., Evaluation and comparison of multi-omics data integration methods for cancer subtyping, PLoS Comput. Biol., 17, 8, (2021)