Efficiency evaluation of wastewater treatment by three macrophytes using a pilot-constructed wetland system in Ota, Nigeria

被引:1
作者
Justin, Lazarus D. [1 ]
Olukanni, David O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Covenant Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Ota, Ogun, Nigeria
关键词
constructed wetland; duckweed; macrophytes; phytoremediation; water lettuce; water hyacinth; AQUATIC PLANTS; LEMNA-MINOR; HYACINTH; REMOVAL; PHYTOREMEDIATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.2166/wh.2024.116
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Three aquatic macrophytes were used to treat wastewater using a pilot-constructed wetland (CW) system to determine the most efficient plants for removing contaminants from wastewater. The three macrophytes are water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes), and duckweed (Lemna minor). Three 150 L capacity tanks with sand and gravel as substrates were used as the pilot CW for each plant. Upon initial examination, the raw wastewater was not compliant with standard discharge limits. The wastewater samples were collected every 7 days for 3 weeks for treatment. From the findings, at 14 days hydraulic retention time (HRT), E. crassipes and P. stratiotes achieved the highest total phosphorus (TP) and chemical oxygen deman (COD) reductions of 99.3 and 99.4%, respectively. E. crassipes indicated better biological oxygen demand removal efficiency of 91.3%, COD (85.0%), electrical conductivity (90.4%), total dissolved solids (89.7%), and total coliforms (66.0%). Albeit, P. stratiotes indicated better results for total suspended solids (96.2%), TP (7.55%), and E. coli (94.4%), while L. minor was better with 90.8% total nitrogen removal. The overall analysis showed E. crassipes to be more efficient than the three macrophytes. However, the other two plants are replaceable options and large-scale implementation of this project in the community would be a major contributor to actualizing SDG number 6.
引用
收藏
页码:2040 / 2053
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Comparison of removal efficiency of pathogenic microbes in four types of wastewater treatment systems in Denmark [J].
Adrados, B. ;
Arias, C. A. ;
Perez, L. M. ;
Codony, F. ;
Becares, E. ;
Brix, H. ;
Morato, J. .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 124 :1-6
[2]  
Ajibade F.O., 2013, INT J ENG SCI, V2, P16, DOI [10.6084/m9.figshare.940965, DOI 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.940965]
[3]  
Al-Hashimi M. A., 2010, J KING SAUD U ENG SC, V22, P11, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1018-3639(18)30505-1
[4]  
Alufasi Richwell, 2017, Environmental Technology Reviews, V6, P135, DOI [10.1080/21622515.2017.1325940, 10.1080/21622515.2017.1325940]
[5]   A Review of Phosphorus Removal Technologies and Their Applicability to Small-Scale Domestic Wastewater Treatment Systems [J].
Bunce, Joshua T. ;
Ndam, Edmond ;
Ofiteru, Irina D. ;
Moore, Andrew ;
Graham, David W. .
FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2018, 6
[6]   Sulfate removal and sulfur transformation in constructed wetlands: The roles of filling material and plant biomass [J].
Chen, Yi ;
Wen, Yue ;
Zhou, Qi ;
Huang, Jingang ;
Vymazal, Jan ;
Kuschk, Peter .
WATER RESEARCH, 2016, 102 :572-581
[7]  
Edaigbini PI, 2015, Deleted Journal, V5, P1
[8]   Application of common duckweed (Lemna minor) in phytoremediation of chemicals in the environment: State and future perspective [J].
Ekperusi, Abraham O. ;
Sikoki, Francis D. ;
Nwachukwu, Eunice O. .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2019, 223 :285-309
[9]   Lemna minor tolerance to metal-working fluid residues: implications for rhizoremediation [J].
Grijalbo, L. ;
Becerril, J. M. ;
Barrutia, O. ;
Gutierrez-Manero, J. ;
Lucas Garcia, J. A. .
PLANT BIOLOGY, 2016, 18 (04) :695-702
[10]   Comparison of continuous and pulse mode of operation of pilot biosand reactors treating winery effluent [J].
Holtman, G. A. ;
Haldenwang, R. ;
Welz, P. J. .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 182