Utility of Combining Prostate Health Index and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

被引:1
作者
Sekine, Yoshitaka [1 ]
Fujizuka, Yuji [1 ]
Nakazawa, Shun [1 ]
Tsuji, Yusuke [1 ]
Ohtsu, Akira [1 ]
Miyazawa, Yoshiyuki [1 ]
Arai, Seiji [1 ]
Nomura, Masashi [1 ]
Koike, Hidekazu [1 ]
Matsui, Hiroshi [1 ]
Shibuya, Kei [2 ]
Ito, Kazuto [3 ]
Ikota, Hayato [4 ]
Suzuki, Kazuhiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Gunma Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, Maebashi, Japan
[2] Gunma Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Maebashi, Japan
[3] Kurosawa Hosp, Dept Urol, Takasaki, Japan
[4] Gunma Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Pathol, Maebashi, Japan
关键词
PI-RADS; prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; prostate health index; PSA; ANTIGEN;
D O I
10.1111/iju.70024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveIn this study, we compared the prostate health index (PHI) and the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) before prostate biopsy and evaluated the utility of combining them in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC).MethodsBetween November 2021 and March 2023, 105 patients admitted to Gunma University Hospital for prostate biopsy after undergoing both MRI and PHI measurements were enrolled in this study. We investigated the diagnostic impacts of [-2]proPSA related indexes on clinically significant PC (csPC) and the complementary effects of PHI and PI-RADS.ResultsThe median of PHI was 59.9, and 72 patients (69%) were diagnosed with PC. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for patients diagnosed with PC indicated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.816 for PHI and 0.753 for PI-RADS. For PHI, when the sensitivity was 90% and 95%, the specificity was 51.5% and 45.5%, respectively. Both are higher than those of the conventional PSA-related indices. In addition, the ROC curve in patients with a diagnosis of csPC (n = 67) indicated an AUC of 0.793 for PHI and 0.746 for PI-RADS. Furthermore, if biopsy was restricted to patients with PI-RADS >= 4 or PHI >= 38.1, 21% of unnecessary biopsies could be avoided, with only one (1.5%) patient with csPC being missed.ConclusionsPHI is more available for detecting csPC than PSA and PSA F/T. Moreover, there is a possibility that unnecessary prostate biopsies can be avoided by combining PHI and PI-RADS.
引用
收藏
页码:658 / 663
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   A Multicenter Study of [-2]Pro-Prostate Specific Antigen Combined With Prostate Specific Antigen and Free Prostate Specific Antigen for Prostate Cancer Detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml Prostate Specific Antigen Range [J].
Catalona, William J. ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Sanda, Martin G. ;
Wei, John T. ;
Klee, George G. ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Slawin, Kevin M. ;
Marks, Leonard S. ;
Loeb, Stacy ;
Broyles, Dennis L. ;
Shin, Sanghyuk S. ;
Cruz, Amabelle B. ;
Chan, Daniel W. ;
Sokoll, Lori J. ;
Roberts, William L. ;
van Schaik, Ron H. N. ;
Mizrahi, Isaac A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (05) :1650-1655
[2]   Multicenter Evaluation of the Prostate Health Index to Detect Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Biopsy Naive Men [J].
de la Calle, Claire ;
Patil, Dattatraya ;
Wei, John T. ;
Scherr, Douglas S. ;
Sokoll, Lori ;
Chan, Daniel W. ;
Siddiqui, Javed ;
Mosquera, Juan Miguel ;
Rubin, Mark A. ;
Sanda, Martin G. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (01) :65-72
[3]   Analysis of false positive PI-RADS 4 lesions: experience from a single nonacademic center using cognitive fusion [J].
de Souza, Bianca Carla Azevedo ;
Novaes, Marco Antonio Soares ;
de Souza, Maiara Ferreira ;
do Amaral, Maria Estela Pompeu ;
Mota, Augusto ;
Athanazio, Daniel Abensur .
INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 55 (05) :1081-1085
[4]   Molecular Biomarkers for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Del Pino-Sedeno, Tasmania ;
Infante-Ventura, Diego ;
Castellano, Aythami de Armas ;
De Pablos-Rodriguez, Pedro ;
Rueda-Dominguez, Antonio ;
Serrano-Aguilar, Pedro ;
Trujillo-Martin, Maria M. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 46 :105-127
[5]   Combining Prostate Health Index density, magnetic resonance imaging and prior negative biopsy status to improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer [J].
Druskin, Sasha C. ;
Tosoian, Jeffrey J. ;
Young, Allen ;
Collica, Sarah ;
Srivastava, Arnav ;
Ghabili, Kamyar ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. ;
Carter, H. Ballentine ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Sokoll, Lori J. ;
Ross, Ashley E. ;
Pavlovich, Christian P. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (04) :619-626
[6]   The Prostate Health Index adds predictive value to multi-parametric MRI in detecting significant prostate cancers in a repeat biopsy population [J].
Gnanapragasam, V. J. ;
Burling, K. ;
George, A. ;
Stearn, S. ;
Warren, A. ;
Barrett, T. ;
Koo, B. ;
Gallagher, F. A. ;
Doble, A. ;
Kastner, C. ;
Parker, R. A. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
[7]   Blood-based and urinary prostate cancer biomarkers: a review and comparison of novel biomarkers for detection and treatment decisions [J].
Hendriks, R. J. ;
van Oort, I. M. ;
Schalken, J. A. .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2017, 20 (01) :12-19
[8]   Combining prostate health index and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in an Asian population [J].
Hsieh, Po-Fan ;
Li, Wei-Juan ;
Lin, Wei-Ching ;
Chang, Han ;
Chang, Chao-Hsiang ;
Huang, Chi-Ping ;
Yang, Chi-Rei ;
Chen, Wen-Chi ;
Chang, Yi-Huei ;
Wu, Hsi-Chin .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (05) :1207-1214
[9]   The diagnostic accuracy of the age-adjusted and prostate volume-adjusted biopsy method in males with prostate specific antigen levels of 4.1-10.0 ng/mL [J].
Ito, K ;
Ohi, M ;
Yamamoto, T ;
Miyamoto, S ;
Kurokawa, K ;
Fukabori, Y ;
Suzuki, K ;
Yamanaka, H .
CANCER, 2002, 95 (10) :2112-2119
[10]   Diagnostic Impacts of Clinical Laboratory Based p2PSA Indexes on any Grade, Gleason Grade Group 2 or Greater, or 3 or Greater Prostate Cancer and Prostate Specific Antigen below 10 ng/ml [J].
Ito, Kazuto ;
Yokomizo, Akira ;
Tokunaga, Shoji ;
Arai, Gaku ;
Sugimoto, Mikio ;
Akakura, Koichiro ;
Hasumi, Hisashi ;
Sakai, Hideki ;
Ouraji, Akiko ;
Oki, Ryo ;
Kashiwagi, Eiji ;
Kobori, Yoshitomo ;
Hirama, Hiromi ;
Kitoh, Hiroki ;
Uemura, Hiroji ;
Hakariya, Tomoaki ;
Suzuki, Kazuhiro .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (01) :83-91