Association of various RAS codon mutations and prognostic outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy

被引:0
作者
Wu, Xiao-Gang [1 ]
Liu, Wei [1 ]
Wang, Yan-Yan [1 ]
Wang, Kun [1 ]
Xing, Bao-Cai [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Canc Hosp & Inst, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surg Dept1, State Key Lab Holist Integrat Management Gastroint, Beijing Key Lab Carcinogenesis & Translat Res, Beijing 100142, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2024年 / 13卷 / 19期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
colorectal cancer; hepatectomy; liver metastasis; prognosis; RAS codon mutation; HEPATIC RESECTION; BRAF-MUTATION; CANCER; KRAS; SURVIVAL; CHEMOTHERAPY; RECURRENCE; NRAS; SURGERY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.70168
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The prognostic and predictive value of RAS mutations in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who have undergone hepatectomy holds substantial importance. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of different RAS codon mutations on long-term survival in CRLM patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinicopathological data from 399 CRLM patients with RAS mutations who underwent hepatectomy between January 2000 and December 2020. The RAS mutation gene status was assessed in KRAS codons (G12, G13, Q61, and A146) and NRAS codons (G12, G13, and Q61). Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier plotter and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze the clinicopathological data. Results: In the entire cohort, patients with KRAS G12 mutations exhibited the most favorable prognosis (p = 0.018). Comparatively, patients harboring KRAS Q61 mutations experienced poorer overall survival (OS) with a median of 15 months versus 33 months (p = 0.011) when compared to those with KRAS G12 mutations. Moreover, patients with NRAS Q61 mutations also showed decreased OS with a median of 26 months versus 33 months (p = 0.020) in comparison to KRAS G12 mutation patients. The results of multivariate analysis showed that both KRAS Q61 mutation (HR 2.130; 95% CI 1.088-4.168; p = 0.027) and NRAS Q61 mutation (HR 2.877; 95% CI 1.398-5.922; p = 0.004) were independent influencing factors of OS. Based on all identified risk factors, patients with RAS mutation were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups. Notably, in the high-risk group, the incorporation of postoperative chemotherapy was associated with longer OS, while it did not improve the survival of patients in the low-risk group. Conclusions: KRAS Q61 and NRAS Q61 mutations are promising predictors for OS in CRLM patients after hepatectomy. Postoperative chemotherapy may significantly benefit CRLM patients with RAS mutations, particularly those identified as high-risk.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Adam R, 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P644, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000141198.92114.16
  • [2] Is Perioperative Chemotherapy Useful for Solitary, Metachronous, Colorectal Liver Metastases?
    Adam, Rene
    Bhangui, Prashant
    Poston, Graeme
    Mirza, Darius
    Nuzzo, Gennaro
    Barroso, Eduardo
    Ijzermans, Jan
    Hubert, Catherine
    Ruers, Theo
    Capussotti, Lorenzo
    Ouellet, Jean-Francois
    Laurent, Christophe
    Cugat, Esteban
    Colombo, Pierre Emmanuel
    Milicevic, Miroslav
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 252 (05) : 774 - 785
  • [3] RAS Mutation Clinical Risk Score to Predict Survival After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases
    Brudvik, Kristoffer W.
    Jones, Robert P.
    Giuliante, Felice
    Shindoh, Junichi
    Passot, Guillaume
    Chung, Michael H.
    Song, Juhee
    Li, Liang
    Dagenborg, Vegar J.
    Fretland, Asmund A.
    Rosok, Bard
    De Rose, Agostino M.
    Ardito, Francesco
    Edwin, Bjorn
    Panettieri, Elena
    Larocca, Luigi M.
    Yamashita, Suguru
    Conrad, Claudius
    Aloia, Thomas A.
    Poston, Graeme J.
    Bjornbeth, Bjorn A.
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (01) : 120 - 126
  • [4] Oncogenic Ras and its role in tumor cell invasion and metastasis
    Campbell, PM
    Der, CJ
    [J]. SEMINARS IN CANCER BIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (02) : 105 - 114
  • [5] Clinical Features and Outcomes of Patients with Colorectal Cancers Harboring NRAS Mutations
    Cercek, Andrea
    Braghiroli, Maria Ignez
    Chou, Joanne F.
    Hechtman, Jaclyn F.
    Kemeny, Nancy
    Saltz, Leonard
    Capanu, Marinela
    Yaeger, Rona
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 23 (16) : 4753 - 4760
  • [6] Trends in long-term survival following liver resection for hepatic colorectal metastases
    Choti, MA
    Sitzmann, JV
    Tiburi, MF
    Sumetchotimetha, W
    Rangsin, R
    Schulick, RD
    Lillemoe, KD
    Yeo, CJ
    Cameron, JL
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 235 (06) : 759 - 765
  • [7] Impact of RAS/RAF mutations on clinical and prognostic outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Dolatkhah, Roya
    Dastgiri, Saeed
    Sadat, Amir Taher Eftekhar
    Farassati, Faris
    Nezamdoust, Marzieh
    Somi, Mohammad Hossein
    [J]. BIOIMPACTS, 2021, 11 (01) : 5 - 14
  • [8] KRAS A146 Mutations Are Associated With Distinct Clinical Behavior in Patients With Colorectal Liver Metastases
    Erve, Iris van 't
    Wesdorp, Nina J.
    Medina, Jamie E.
    Ferreira, Leonardo
    Leal, Alessandro
    Huiskens, Joost
    Bolhuis, Karen
    van Waesberghe, Jan-Hein T. M.
    Swijnenburg, Rutger-Jan
    van den Broek, Daan
    Velculescu, Victor E.
    Kazemier, Geert
    Punt, Cornelis J. A.
    Meijer, Gerrit A.
    Fijneman, Remond J. A.
    [J]. JCO PRECISION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 5 : 1758 - 1767
  • [9] Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer - Analysis of 1001 consecutive cases
    Fong, Y
    Fortner, J
    Sun, RL
    Brennan, MF
    Blumgart, LH
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 230 (03) : 309 - 318
  • [10] Prognostic Value of KRAS Exon 3 and Exon 4 Mutations in Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Guo, Tianan
    Wu, Yuchen
    Huang, Dan
    Jin, Yutong
    Shen, Weiqi
    Cai, Sanjun
    Zhou, Xiaoyan
    Zhu, Xiaoli
    Liu, Fangqi
    Xu, Ye
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 12 (17): : 5331 - 5337