NGOisation and food sovereignty: unearthing the intricacies of NGO-driven food sovereignty efforts. Insights from Uganda

被引:0
作者
Byaruhanga, Ronald [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, LUCSUS, Box 170, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Seed sovereignty; Movement building; NGOisation; Agroecology; NGOs; Food sovereignty; POLITICS; SECURITY; POLITICIZATION; CONTRADICTIONS; PEASANT; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1007/s10460-024-10645-5
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
In many places, social movements and organised networks are the primary drivers of mobilisation for food sovereignty. Elsewhere, the concept has been institutionalized and incorporated into national food policy frameworks. However, there is a dearth of knowledge regarding places where food sovereignty efforts are spearheaded by NGOised civil society. This study addresses this gap by examining five Civil Society Organisations promoting food sovereignty in Uganda through qualitative research. Through in-depth interviews, the study explores the implementation, activism, and mobilisation strategies employed by these organisations. The findings reveal that civil society organisations play a significant role in advancing food sovereignty in Uganda. They do so through practical initiatives such as disseminating knowledge, building capacity among smallholder farmers, promoting agroecological practices, and politicizing agricultural development through farmer mobilisation, policy advocacy, and formation of strategic alliances. Nonetheless, the study highlights critical areas for improvement. First, the need for better coordination among CSOs to create synergies that can enhance the impact and sustainability of their efforts. Second, the need to complement non-contentious strategies with more politically assertive actions to address systemic barriers. Finally, the need to forge alliances for FS among rural producers, urban consumers, and other non-farming populations. The main takeaway from these findings is that Food Sovereignty is a dynamic and context-dependent concept, requiring equally flexible strategies to promote it. Therefore, the choice of mobilisation strategies should be carefully adapted to the unique political, cultural, and economic context, rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all approach.
引用
收藏
页码:905 / 922
页数:18
相关论文
共 128 条
[1]   Food sovereignty, food security and democratic choice: critical contradictions, difficult conciliations [J].
Agarwal, Bina .
JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2014, 41 (06) :1247-1268
[2]   Translating Agroecology into Policy: The Case of France and the United Kingdom [J].
Ajates Gonzalez, Raquel ;
Thomas, Jessica ;
Chang, Marina .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (08)
[3]  
Alberdi Goiuri, 2020, JESSICA DUNCAN TOMAS
[4]   Agroecology, Small Farms, and Food Sovereignty [J].
Altieri, Miguel A. .
MONTHLY REVIEW-AN INDEPENDENT SOCIALIST MAGAZINE, 2009, 61 (03) :102-113
[5]  
Altieri Miguel A., 2010, AGROECOLOGY VERSUS E
[6]   TOWARDS FOOD SOVEREIGNTY: THE ROLE OF SMALLHOLDER FARMERS' SEED SECURITY IN IMPROVING CLIMATE CHANGE RESILIENCE IN NORTHERN MALAWI [J].
Amoak, Daniel ;
Lupafya, Esther ;
Dakishoni, Laifolo ;
Luginaah, Isaac .
GEOGRAPHICAL REVIEW, 2025, 115 (1-2) :243-268
[7]   Rice Against Communism: The Politicisation of Agriculture from 'Above' and 'Below' [J].
Anderl, Felix .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 17 (01) :47-72
[8]  
Andrews Scott, 2013, SWP, V25
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Statistical Abstract
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2007, NYLNI NYLNI 2007 FOR, P23