Endoscopic prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy: First French survey of 10 patients

被引:0
|
作者
Rathat, Gauthier [1 ]
Chaumette, Maude [1 ]
Fontaine, Victoria [1 ]
Rebel, Lucie [1 ]
Pissarra, Joana [2 ]
Duflos, Claire [2 ,3 ]
Duraes, Martha [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Arnaud Villeneuve, Dept gynaecol & breast Surg, 371 Ave Doyen Gaston Giraud, F-34090 Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Montpellier Univ Hosp, Clin Res & Epidemiol Unit, Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Montpellier, IDESP, INSERM, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
关键词
Endoscopic mastectomy; Prophylactic mastectomy; Breast reconstruction; Breast cancer; Brca; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; ONCOLOGICAL SAFETY; NATIONAL COLLEGE; RISK; GYNECOLOGISTS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102862
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: Current recommendations preconize prophylactic mastectomy for women over 30 with increased risk of breast cancer. Several surgical techniques are available to perform bilateral mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction. Our primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of the Endoscopic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy (E-NSM) technique, without robotic assistance, using a single axillary incision and with immediate reconstruction using a prepectoral prosthesis in prophylactic indications. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the risks of postoperative complications and the esthetic results. Material and methods: This is a preliminary report of a prospective single-center interventional clinical study with a final enrolment target of 20 patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete surgical procedures per ENSM. The secondary endpoints were the rate of conversions to conventional surgery, infections, hematomas, skin injury, pain and esthetic results (Breast-Q questionnaire, additional cosmetic procedures). Results: From April 2019 to June 2022, 10 patients were included for 19 procedures (9 bilateral mastectomies, 1 unilateral). All surgical procedures were complete; no conversion to conventional surgery was required. The rate of complications per procedure requiring revision surgery was 16 % (1 skin necrosis, 1 postoperative hematoma and 1 surgical site infection). No prosthesis was removed. The seroma rate was 5 %. All patients would recommend this technique and were very satisfied or satisfied with the esthetic result. A second cosmetic procedure (lipofilling) was necessary in 50 % of patients. Discussion: These preliminary data attest to the feasibility and safety of the E-NSM approach, and should be confirmed on a larger cohort and longer-term follow-up. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03838549
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Novel Approach of INTRABEAM Intraoperative Radiotherapy for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Breast Reconstruction
    Pan, Lingxiao
    Zheng, Wenbo
    Ye, Xigang
    Chen, Lun
    Ke, Yaohua
    Wan, Minghui
    Tang, Wei
    Gao, Jin
    Zhang, Xiaoshen
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2014, 14 (06) : 435 - 441
  • [42] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: How Often Is the Nipple Involved?
    Edge, Stephen B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (30) : 4030 - 4032
  • [43] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Irradiated Breasts: Selecting Patients to Minimize Complications
    Rong Tang
    Suzanne B. Coopey
    Amy S. Colwell
    Michelle C. Specht
    Michele A. Gadd
    Kari Kansal
    Maureen P. McEvoy
    Andrea L. Merrill
    Upahvan Rai
    Alphonse Taghian
    William G. Austen
    Barbara L. Smith
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2015, 22 : 3331 - 3337
  • [44] Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: The role of adjuvant radiotherapy
    Janssen, Stefan
    Holz-Sapra, Edna
    Rades, Dirk
    Moser, Alexander
    Studer, Gabriela
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2015, 9 (06) : 2435 - 2441
  • [45] Oncological safety of nipple-sparing prophylactic mastectomy: A review of the literature on 3716 cases
    Muller, T.
    Baratte, A.
    Bruant-Rodier, C.
    Bodin, F.
    Mathelin, C.
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE PLASTIQUE ESTHETIQUE, 2018, 63 (03): : E6 - E13
  • [46] Robotic da Vinci Xi-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy: First clinical report
    Sarfati, Benjamin
    Honart, Jean-Francois
    Leymarie, Nicolas
    Rimareix, Francoise
    Al Khashnam, Heba
    Kolb, Frederic
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (03) : 373 - 376
  • [47] Nipple malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy and expander–implant reconstruction
    Hiroki Mori
    Noriko Uemura
    Mutsumi Okazaki
    Tsuyoshi Nakagawa
    Takanobu Sato
    Breast Cancer, 2016, 23 : 740 - 744
  • [48] Comparing Nipple-sparing Mastectomy to Secondary Nipple Reconstruction A Multi-institutional Study
    Santosa, Katherine B.
    Qi, Ji
    Kim, Hyungjin M.
    Hamill, Jennifer B.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Chun, Yoon Sun
    Wilkins, Edwin G.
    Kozlow, Jeffrey H.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 274 (02) : 390 - 395
  • [49] Optimal Strategies for the Management of Macromastia and Breast Ptosis for Patients Undergoing Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
    Moreira, Andrea A.
    Kozorosky, Erica
    Coopey, Suzanne B.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2025,
  • [50] Subcutaneous Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction
    Shi, Aiping
    Wu, Di
    Li, Xingliang
    Zhang, Shifu
    Li, Sijie
    Xu, Hui
    Xie, Huijun
    Fan, Zhimin
    BREAST CARE, 2012, 7 (02) : 131 - 136