Endoscopic prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy: First French survey of 10 patients

被引:0
|
作者
Rathat, Gauthier [1 ]
Chaumette, Maude [1 ]
Fontaine, Victoria [1 ]
Rebel, Lucie [1 ]
Pissarra, Joana [2 ]
Duflos, Claire [2 ,3 ]
Duraes, Martha [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Arnaud Villeneuve, Dept gynaecol & breast Surg, 371 Ave Doyen Gaston Giraud, F-34090 Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Montpellier Univ Hosp, Clin Res & Epidemiol Unit, Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Montpellier, IDESP, INSERM, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
关键词
Endoscopic mastectomy; Prophylactic mastectomy; Breast reconstruction; Breast cancer; Brca; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; ONCOLOGICAL SAFETY; NATIONAL COLLEGE; RISK; GYNECOLOGISTS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102862
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: Current recommendations preconize prophylactic mastectomy for women over 30 with increased risk of breast cancer. Several surgical techniques are available to perform bilateral mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction. Our primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of the Endoscopic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy (E-NSM) technique, without robotic assistance, using a single axillary incision and with immediate reconstruction using a prepectoral prosthesis in prophylactic indications. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the risks of postoperative complications and the esthetic results. Material and methods: This is a preliminary report of a prospective single-center interventional clinical study with a final enrolment target of 20 patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete surgical procedures per ENSM. The secondary endpoints were the rate of conversions to conventional surgery, infections, hematomas, skin injury, pain and esthetic results (Breast-Q questionnaire, additional cosmetic procedures). Results: From April 2019 to June 2022, 10 patients were included for 19 procedures (9 bilateral mastectomies, 1 unilateral). All surgical procedures were complete; no conversion to conventional surgery was required. The rate of complications per procedure requiring revision surgery was 16 % (1 skin necrosis, 1 postoperative hematoma and 1 surgical site infection). No prosthesis was removed. The seroma rate was 5 %. All patients would recommend this technique and were very satisfied or satisfied with the esthetic result. A second cosmetic procedure (lipofilling) was necessary in 50 % of patients. Discussion: These preliminary data attest to the feasibility and safety of the E-NSM approach, and should be confirmed on a larger cohort and longer-term follow-up. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03838549
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nipple margin assessment at the time of nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Cadili, Lina
    Pao, Jin-Si
    McKevitt, Elaine
    Dingee, Carol
    Bazzarelli, Amy
    Warburton, Rebecca
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 66 (03) : E298 - E303
  • [22] Reconstructive Approach for Patients With Augmentation Mammaplasty Undergoing Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Alperovich, Michael
    Choi, Mihye
    Frey, Jordan D.
    Karp, Nolan S.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2014, 34 (07) : 1059 - 1065
  • [23] Oncological safety of therapeutic 'nipple-sparing mastectomy' followed by reconstruction: a systematic review
    Blanckaert, Maxim
    Vranckx, Jan
    ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 2021, 121 (03) : 155 - 163
  • [24] Prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy for CHEK2 mutation: a case report
    Yuan, Kyle
    Lin-Hurtubise, Kevin M.
    Lee, Mark Y.
    ANNALS OF BREAST SURGERY, 2022, 6
  • [25] Nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant reconstruction: the Westmead experience
    Sood, Samriti
    Elder, Elisabeth
    French, James
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 85 (05) : 363 - 367
  • [26] Nipple-sparing Mastectomy: What the Radiologist Should Know
    Lee, Samantha C.
    Mendez-Broomberg, Karen
    Eacobacci, Katherine
    Vincoff, Nina S.
    Gupta, Ekta
    McElligott, Suzanne E.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2022, 42 (02) : 321 - 339
  • [27] Use of bilateral prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with high risk of breast cancer
    Valero, M. G.
    Moo, T-A
    Muhsen, S.
    Zabor, E. C.
    Stempel, M.
    Pusic, A.
    Gemignani, M. L.
    Morrow, M.
    Sacchini, V
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 (10) : 1307 - 1312
  • [28] Low Cancer Occurrence Rate following Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Boyd, Carter J.
    Ramesh, Sruthi
    Bekisz, Jonathan M.
    Guth, Amber A.
    Axelrod, Deborah M.
    Shapiro, Richard L.
    Hiotis, Karen
    Schnabel, Freya R.
    Karp, Nolan S.
    Choi, Mihye
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 153 (01) : 37E - 43E
  • [29] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction, Aesthetic Results, and Sensation
    Yueh, Janet H.
    Houlihan, Mary Jane
    Slavin, Sumner A.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    Pories, Susan E.
    Morris, Donald J.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2009, 62 (05) : 586 - 590
  • [30] Nipple-sparing mastectomy: indications, oncologic safety
    Ananthakrishnan, P.
    Feldman, S.
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2012, 67 (03) : 257 - 270