Endoscopic prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy: First French survey of 10 patients

被引:0
|
作者
Rathat, Gauthier [1 ]
Chaumette, Maude [1 ]
Fontaine, Victoria [1 ]
Rebel, Lucie [1 ]
Pissarra, Joana [2 ]
Duflos, Claire [2 ,3 ]
Duraes, Martha [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Arnaud Villeneuve, Dept gynaecol & breast Surg, 371 Ave Doyen Gaston Giraud, F-34090 Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Montpellier Univ Hosp, Clin Res & Epidemiol Unit, Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Montpellier, IDESP, INSERM, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
关键词
Endoscopic mastectomy; Prophylactic mastectomy; Breast reconstruction; Breast cancer; Brca; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; ONCOLOGICAL SAFETY; NATIONAL COLLEGE; RISK; GYNECOLOGISTS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102862
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: Current recommendations preconize prophylactic mastectomy for women over 30 with increased risk of breast cancer. Several surgical techniques are available to perform bilateral mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction. Our primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of the Endoscopic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy (E-NSM) technique, without robotic assistance, using a single axillary incision and with immediate reconstruction using a prepectoral prosthesis in prophylactic indications. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the risks of postoperative complications and the esthetic results. Material and methods: This is a preliminary report of a prospective single-center interventional clinical study with a final enrolment target of 20 patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete surgical procedures per ENSM. The secondary endpoints were the rate of conversions to conventional surgery, infections, hematomas, skin injury, pain and esthetic results (Breast-Q questionnaire, additional cosmetic procedures). Results: From April 2019 to June 2022, 10 patients were included for 19 procedures (9 bilateral mastectomies, 1 unilateral). All surgical procedures were complete; no conversion to conventional surgery was required. The rate of complications per procedure requiring revision surgery was 16 % (1 skin necrosis, 1 postoperative hematoma and 1 surgical site infection). No prosthesis was removed. The seroma rate was 5 %. All patients would recommend this technique and were very satisfied or satisfied with the esthetic result. A second cosmetic procedure (lipofilling) was necessary in 50 % of patients. Discussion: These preliminary data attest to the feasibility and safety of the E-NSM approach, and should be confirmed on a larger cohort and longer-term follow-up. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03838549
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Prophylactic and Therapeutic Indications
    Spear, Scott L.
    Willey, Shawna C.
    Feldman, Elizabeth D.
    Cocilovo, Costanza
    Sidawy, Mary
    Al-Attar, Ali
    Hannan, Catherine
    Seiboth, Laura
    Nahabedian, Maurice Y.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 128 (05) : 1005 - 1014
  • [2] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Spear, Scott L.
    Hannan, Catherine M.
    Willey, Shawna C.
    Cocilovo, Costanza
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 123 (06) : 1665 - 1673
  • [3] Prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: results of a French prospective trial
    Houvenaeghel, G.
    Cohen, M.
    Dammacco, M. A.
    D'Halluin, F.
    Regis, C.
    Gutowski, M.
    Acker, O.
    Fournier, M.
    Bannier, M.
    Lusque, A.
    Jouve, E.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (03) : 296 - 301
  • [4] Bipedicled Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Traditional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Comparison of 2 Alternative Techniques in Order to Save Nipple-Areola Complex
    Falco, Giuseppe
    Curcio, Annalisa
    Marongiu, Francesco
    Buggi, Federico
    Mingozzi, Matteo
    Mele, Simone
    Ferrari, Guglielmo
    Folli, Secondo
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 84 (04) : 366 - 374
  • [5] Nipple Discharge After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With and Without Associated Pregnancy
    Tang, Rong
    Kelly, Bridget N.
    Smith, Barbara L.
    Lanahan, Conor R.
    Brown, Carson L.
    Gadd, Michele A.
    Hughes, Kevin S.
    Oseni, Tawakalitu O.
    McGugin, Caroline
    Specht, Michelle C.
    Coopey, Suzanne B.
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2019, 19 (04) : E534 - E539
  • [6] Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy with a skin-sparing, nipple-sparing technique as an oncological and esthetic procedure
    Casale, C.
    Sanchez Peraza, J. J.
    Almeida Valverde, L.
    Tebar Diaz, A.
    Gonzalez Delgado, B.
    CLINICA E INVESTIGACION EN GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2015, 42 (03): : 98 - 100
  • [7] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Jensen, Jay Arthur
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 226 (01) : 108 - 108
  • [8] Delay techniques for nipple-sparing mastectomy: A systematic review
    Karian, Laurel S.
    Therattil, Paul J.
    Wey, Philip D.
    Nini, Kevin T.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2017, 70 (02) : 236 - 242
  • [9] Terminal Duct lobular units are scarce in the nipple: Implications for prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Stolier, Alan J.
    Wang, Jianzhou
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (02) : 438 - 442
  • [10] Nipple Loss following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Mastroianni, Melissa
    Lin, Alex M.
    Smith, Barbara L.
    Austen, William G., Jr.
    Colwell, Amy S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 138 (01) : 24E - 30E