Igniting the fire and seeing through the smoke: Enabling medical students to see themselves as future clinical academics

被引:1
作者
Bracewell, Bethany [1 ]
Ledger, Alison [2 ]
Reid, Anne-Marie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds, England
[2] Univ Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
关键词
Clinical academic; barriers; enablers; undergraduate; educators; RESEARCH SKILLS;
D O I
10.1080/0142159X.2024.2422542
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
PurposeLack of recruitment to clinical academic careers is of concern, and may be linked to lack of awareness and promotion of this pathway in undergraduate medical education. Our study explored undergraduate experiences which support academic career progression and potential barriers to pursuing Specialised Foundation roles in the United Kingdom.MethodsWe adopted a constructivist lens and conducted interviews with specialised foundation programme (SFP) doctors and final year students who had applied for SFP positions. We analysed interview transcripts using reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsWe recognised four key stages which stimulated and supported students in pursuing a clinical academic career: (1) Lighting the inner spark; (2) Igniting the fire; (3) Feeding the fire; and (4) Seeing through the smoke. Although students showed a strong inner drive, meaningful undergraduate experiences and positive interactions with academics were crucial for sparking academic interests. Participants were more often inspired by their extra-curricular activities than core undergraduate education.ConclusionsEarly positive experiences are needed for students to overcome stereotypes and consider clinical academic careers. Medical schools should raise awareness of clinical academic careers early on, ensure all students have opportunities to participate in relevant activities with academic teams, and develop medical educators and researchers who can engage and inspire others.
引用
收藏
页码:1211 / 1216
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Medical students' perspective on the teaching of medical statistics in the undergraduate medical curriculum [J].
Astin, J ;
Jenkins, T ;
Moore, L .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (07) :1003-1006
[2]   Enablers and barriers to progressing a clinical academic career in nursing, midwifery and allied health professions: A cross-sectional survey [J].
Avery, Miriam ;
Westwood, Greta ;
Richardson, Alison .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2022, 31 (3-4) :406-416
[3]  
Baker S.E., 2012, NATL CTR RES METHODS
[4]  
Beckwith Hannah, 2022, Postgrad Med J, DOI 10.1136/postmj/postgradmedj-2021-141278
[5]   One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) :328-352
[6]  
Brinkmann S., 2022, Qualitative interviewing: conversational knowledge through research interviews
[7]   Research paradigms in medical education research [J].
Bunniss, Suzanne ;
Kelly, Diane R. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 44 (04) :358-366
[8]   Gender equity programmes in academic medicine: a realist evaluation approach to Athena SWAN processes [J].
Caffrey, Louise ;
Wyatt, David ;
Fudge, Nina ;
Mattingley, Helena ;
Williamson, Catherine ;
McKevitt, Christopher .
BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (09)
[9]   Improving clinical and translational research training: a qualitative evaluation of the Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute KL2-mentored research scholars program [J].
Comeau, Dawn L. ;
Escoffery, Cam ;
Freedman, Ariela ;
Ziegler, Thomas R. ;
Blumberg, Henry M. .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 65 (01) :23-31
[10]   A realist review of scholarly experiences in medical education [J].
Cornett, Marian ;
Palermo, Claire ;
Wallace, Megan J. ;
Diug, Basia ;
Ward, Bernadette .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 55 (02) :159-166