Development of a revised version of the SCRAM questionnaire to evaluate sleep, circadian rhythms, and mood characteristics

被引:1
作者
Di Pompeo, Ilaria [1 ]
Migliore, Simone [1 ]
Curcio, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ LAquila, Dept Biotechnol & Appl Clin Sci, Via Vetoio, I-67100 Laquila, Italy
关键词
Depression; anxiety; chronotype; sleep quality; assessment; INSOMNIA SEVERITY INDEX; STRESS SCALES DASS; ITALIAN VERSION; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; NORMATIVE DATA; HEALTH SURVEY; DEPRESSION; ANXIETY; VALIDATION; EVENINGNESS;
D O I
10.1080/07420528.2024.2428195
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Sleep quality, chronotype, and mood may be closely interconnected processes. Typically, such constructs are measured independently, leaving out important information regarding their intrinsic relationships. The Sleep, Circadian Rhythms, and Mood (SCRAM) questionnaire is a promising tool for measuring sleep, chronotype, understood as diurnal preference, and depressive symptomatology, and the interrelationships between them. Anxiety has also been linked to sleep quality, chronotype, and depression, but there is currently no scale that measures these constructs together. This study aims to validate a revised version of the SCRAM questionnaire (rSCRAM), incorporating items to measure anxious mood. 486 Italian participants were involved in two studies. In Study 1, principal component analysis (PCA) identified representative anxiety elements from validated questionnaires. In Study 2, after adding the anxiety elements, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) established a 4-factor, 16-item model. The rSCRAM demonstrated excellent psychometric properties: high internal consistency (alpha = 0.72-0.90) and a strong test-retest reliability of the scales over 2 weeks (r = 0.73-0.82), a high correlation for convergent validity, and low correlations for divergent validity. The rSCRAM questionnaire measures the constructs for which it was created and revised. Including the anxiety scale enhances its utility in assessing mental health constructs within a single instrument.
引用
收藏
页码:1454 / 1468
页数:15
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   HORNE AND OSTBERG MORNINGNESS EVENINGNESS QUESTIONNAIRE - A REDUCED SCALE [J].
ADAN, A ;
ALMIRALL, H .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1991, 12 (03) :241-253
[2]   Early Life Sleep Deprivation and Brain Development: Insights From Human and Animal Studies [J].
Alrousan, Ghalya ;
Hassan, Arham ;
Pillai, Aditya Anilkumar ;
Atrooz, Fatin ;
Salim, Samina .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
[3]   A Systematic Review Assessing Bidirectionality between Sleep Disturbances, Anxiety, and Depression [J].
Alvaro, Pasquale K. ;
Roberts, Rachel M. ;
Harris, Jodie K. .
SLEEP, 2013, 36 (07) :1059-1068
[4]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[5]   The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: Translation, validation and norming [J].
Apolone, G ;
Mosconi, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :1025-1036
[6]   The relationship between chronotype and depressive symptoms: A meta-analysis [J].
Au, Jacky ;
Reece, John .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2017, 218 :93-104
[7]   Insomnia as a predictor of depression: A meta-analytic evaluation of longitudinal epidemiological studies [J].
Baglioni, Chiara ;
Battagliese, Gemma ;
Feige, Bernd ;
Spiegelhalder, Kai ;
Nissen, Christoph ;
Voderholzer, Ulrich ;
Lombardo, Caterina ;
Riemann, Dieter .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2011, 135 (1-3) :10-19
[8]   Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire (ASQ): development and validation [J].
Baker, Amanda ;
Simon, Naomi ;
Keshaviah, Aparna ;
Farabaugh, Amy ;
Deckersbach, Thilo ;
Worthington, John J. ;
Hoge, Elizabeth ;
Fava, Maurizio ;
Pollack, Mark P. .
GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 32 (06)
[9]   Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research [J].
Bastien, Celyne H. ;
Vallieres, Annie ;
Morin, Charles M. .
SLEEP MEDICINE, 2001, 2 (04) :297-307
[10]   Chronotype, circadian rhythms and mood [J].
Bauducco, Serena ;
Richardson, Cele ;
Gradisar, Michael .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 34 :77-83