Developing A Key Performance Indicator System To Integrate Sustainable Corporate Objectives Into Maintenance Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process

被引:0
作者
Bredebach, Christina [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONFERENCE ON PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND LOGISTICS, CPSL 2023-2 | 2023年
关键词
Sustainable Maintenance; Sustainability Strategy; Corporate Objectives; Multi Criteria Decision Making; Analytic Hierarchy Process;
D O I
10.15488/15323
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Maintenance in a manufacturing company is a key function for maintaining or restoring the functional condition of the production equipment and machinery and thus for maintaining the overall efficiency of the company. Because of this role, maintenance is often considered "sustainable". As a result of regulatory requirements as well as stakeholder demands, companies are under pressure to specify their sustainability strategies. However, due to a lack of knowledge about the sustainability potential of this function, the identification of clear objectives for sustainable maintenance is often neglected. Therefore, this paper presents a performance indicator system. 133 performance indicators in the three dimensions of sustainability (economic, environmental and social) were identified in a systematic literature review. In a qualitative content analysis and inductive category building, these were then assigned to 20 different categories. The hierarchical arrangement as well as the derivation of sustainable maintenance objectives from the corporate strategy enables companies to rank the performance indicators with the help of AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), a tool of MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making). This leads to a system of performance indicators based on a company's sustainability strategy, which strengthens the focus on sustainability in maintenance functions.
引用
收藏
页码:914 / 924
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [11] Exploring the impacts and contributions of maintenance function for sustainable manufacturing
    Holgado, Maria
    Macchi, Marco
    Evans, Stephen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2020, 58 (23) : 7292 - 7310
  • [12] MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION SUPPORT - A REVIEW
    KORHONEN, P
    MOSKOWITZ, H
    WALLENIUS, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1992, 63 (03) : 361 - 375
  • [13] Performance indicators for measuring the effects of Smart Maintenance
    Lundgren, Camilla
    Bokrantz, Jon
    Skoogh, Anders
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 70 (06) : 1291 - 1316
  • [14] Mayring P., 2015, QUALITATIVE INHALTSA
  • [15] MEADOWS D H, 1972, P205
  • [16] Empirical analysis of maintenance performance measurement in Belgian industries
    Muchiri, Peter N.
    Pintelon, Liliane
    Martin, Harry
    De Meyer, Anne-Marie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2010, 48 (20) : 5905 - 5924
  • [17] Use of maintenance performance indicators by companies of the industrial hub of Manaus
    Oliveira, Marcelo
    Lopes, Isabel
    Rodrigues, Cristina
    [J]. SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHANGEABLE, AGILE, RECONFIGURABLE AND VIRTUAL PRODUCTION (CARV2016), 2016, 52 : 157 - 160
  • [18] Pawellek G., 2016, Integrierte Instandhaltung und Ersatzteillogistik
  • [19] Peach R, 2016, S AFR J IND ENG, V27, P177
  • [20] Recommended key performance indicators for operational management of wind turbines
    Pfaffel, S.
    Faulstich, S.
    Sheng, S.
    [J]. 16TH DEEP SEA OFFSHORE WIND R&D CONFERENCE, 2019, 1356