Pedagogical practices promoting the development of wisdom in university students

被引:1
作者
Tynjala, Paivi [1 ]
Kallio, Eeva K. [1 ]
Virtanen, Anne [1 ]
Gerlander, Maija [2 ]
Taalas, Peppi [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jyvaskyla, Finnish Inst Educ Res, POB 35, Jyvaskyla 40014, Finland
[2] Univ Jyvaskyla, Ctr Multilingual Acad Commun Movi, Jyvaskyla, Finland
关键词
Wisdom; pedagogical practices; university students; university teaching; higher education; CRITICAL THINKING; PEER ASSESSMENT; EDUCATION; PSYCHOLOGY; EXPERIENCE; QUALITY; SCALE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/03075079.2025.2476160
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Dealing with complex problems requires of future professionals more than knowledge, skills and expertise; it requires wisdom. Recently, the question how to develop wisdom in university students has been raised. Most theoretical models of wisdom include cognitive, affective-social, ethical-existential and action dimensions. The aim of this study was to examine (1) whether the four-dimensional theoretical structure of the wisdom concept can be empirically verified in the higher education context, and (2) what kinds of pedagogical practices explain the development of attributes related to wisdom in university students. Participants of the study were third-year university students (n = 535) representing several disciplines. Data were collected through a survey in which students evaluated their development in wisdom attributes with 46 items and answered 57 items concerning pedagogical practices used on their courses. Exploratory factor analysis and regression analysis were used to analyse the data. The analyses concerning the four-dimensional model of wisdom yielded four factors: cognitive, ethical-existential, affective, and social dimensions, thus partly verifying the theoretical structure. Regarding the pedagogical practices, activities aimed at developing scientific thinking, and sharing and learning from practical experiences explained most the development of attributes of wisdom. Collaboration between students, independent studying, and integration of theory and practice also played an important role. In general, diverse forms of teaching and learning seem to be crucial for the development of prerequisites of wisdom in higher education. Practical implications of the findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Wisdom as expert knowledge system: A critical review of a contemporary operationalization of an ancient concept [J].
Ardelt, M .
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 47 (05) :257-285
[2]   Empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale [J].
Ardelt, M .
RESEARCH ON AGING, 2003, 25 (03) :275-324
[3]  
Ardelt M., 2008, Transcending self-interest: Psychological explorations of the quiet ego, P221, DOI [DOI 10.1037/11771-020, 10.1037/11771-020]
[4]   Can wisdom and psychosocial growth be learned in university courses? [J].
Ardelt, Monika .
JOURNAL OF MORAL EDUCATION, 2020, 49 (01) :30-45
[5]   The validity and students' experiences of peer assessment in a large introductory class of gene technology [J].
Asikainen, Henna ;
Virtanen, Viivi ;
Postareff, Liisa ;
Heino, Pekka .
STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION, 2014, 43 :197-205
[6]   The Fascination of Wisdom Its Nature, Ontogeny, and Function [J].
Baltes, Paul B. ;
Smith, Jacqui .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 3 (01) :56-64
[7]   Wisdom -: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence [J].
Baltes, PB ;
Staudinger, UM .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2000, 55 (01) :122-135
[8]   Learning for an unknown future [J].
Barnett, Ronald .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 31 (01) :65-77
[9]  
Bassett C., 2011, The Oxford Handbook of Reciprocal Adult Development and Learning, P302, DOI [10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199736300.013.0082, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199736300.013.0082]
[10]  
Biggs J., 2011, Teaching for quality learning at university