Development and internal validation of a model predicting successful trial of labour among pregnant individuals with previous one caesarean section: A cohort study (DEVI-CS model)

被引:0
作者
Pegu, Bhabani [1 ]
Subburaj, Sathiya Priya [1 ]
Chaturvedula, Latha [1 ]
Sarkar, Sonali [2 ]
Nair, N. Sreekumaran [3 ]
Keepanasseril, Anish [1 ]
机构
[1] Jawaharlal Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Pondicherry 605006, India
[2] Jawaharlal Inst Med Educ & Res, Prevent & Social Med, Pondicherry 605006, India
[3] Jawaharlal Inst Med Educ & Res, Biostat, Pondicherry 605006, India
关键词
Caesarean section; Prediction model; Trial of labour after caesarean section; Vaginal birth after caesarean section; VAGINAL BIRTH; OBSTETRICS; NOMOGRAM; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop and internally validate a model predicting successful trial of labour among pregnant women with previous caesarean scar. Design: Cohort study. Setting: Tertiary care and teaching hospital. Participants: All pregnant women with one previous caesarean delivery, presenting with singleton pregnancies in cephalic presentation at a gestation age of 37 weeks or more between 2018 and 2022. Main outcome measures: A stepwise multivariable logistic regression, followed by bootstrapping, was used to develop and validate the model. Success was defined as vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) without complications for the mother and baby. Result: Out of 4515 cases of TOLAC, 39.8 % had a successful trial of labour. Maternal age (OR = 0.950, 95 %CI: 0.927-0.974), previous baby weight (OR = 1.000, 95 %CI: 1.000-1.001), indication of previous caesarean section such as breech presentation (OR = 0.453, 95 %CI: 0.315-0.652), failed induction (OR = 0.346, 95 %CI: 0.267-0.447), BISHOP score (OR = 1.725, 95 %Cl: 1.673-1.774) and induction of labour (OR = 0.587, 95 %CI: 0.466-0.741) were the strongest predictors of successful TOLAC. DEVI-CS model showed good discrimination with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.928(95 %CI: 0.921-0.936) and good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. Decision curve analysis showed a net benefit between 5 % and 90 % between the predicted thresholds. Conclusion: The new DEVI-CS prediction model, based on easily captured clinical variables, can quantify the chances of a successful trial of labour after a previous caesarean section. It could aid in shared decision-making regarding the mode of delivery among women with planning the trial of labour after caesarean section.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 217
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Obstet Gynecol, V133, pe110, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003078
[2]   Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates [J].
Betran, Ana Pilar ;
Ye, Jiangfeng ;
Moller, Ann-Beth ;
Souza, Joao Paulo ;
Zhang, Jun .
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 6 (06)
[3]   Validation of Grobman's graphical nomogram for prediction of vaginal delivery in Indian women with previous caesarean section [J].
Bhardwaj, Mahak ;
Gainder, Shalini ;
Chopra, Seema ;
Bagga, Rashmi ;
Saini, Shiv Sajan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X, 2023, 18
[4]   Validation of a Prediction Model for Vaginal Birth After Caesarean [J].
Chaillet, Nils ;
Bujold, Emmanuel ;
Dube, Eric ;
Grobman, William A. .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2013, 35 (02) :119-124
[5]   Prediction models in obstetrics: understanding the treatment paradox and potential solutions to the threat it poses [J].
Cheong-See, F. ;
Allotey, J. ;
Marlin, N. ;
Mol, B. W. ;
Schuit, E. ;
ter Riet, G. ;
Riley, R. D. ;
Moons, K. G. M. ;
Khan, K. S. ;
Thangaratinam, S. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (07) :1060-1064
[6]   Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation [J].
Collins, Gary S. ;
Dhiman, Paula ;
Ma, Jie ;
Schlussel, Michael M. ;
Archer, Lucinda ;
Van Calster, Ben ;
Harrell Jr, Frank E. ;
Martin, Glen P. ;
Moons, Karel G. M. ;
van Smeden, Maarten ;
Sperrin, Matthew ;
Bullock, Garrett S. ;
Riley, Richard .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 384
[7]  
Collins GS, 2015, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V68, P112, DOI [10.7326/M14-0697, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010, 10.7326/M14-0698, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025, 10.1136/bmj.g7594, 10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z, 10.1038/bjc.2014.639, 10.1111/eci.12376, 10.1002/bjs.9736]
[8]   Validation of the Prediction Model for Success of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery [J].
Costantine, Maged M. ;
Fox, Karin ;
Byers, Benjamin D. ;
Mateus, Julio ;
Ghulmiyyah, Labib M. ;
Blackwell, Sean ;
Hankins, Gary D. V. ;
Grobman, William A. ;
Saade, George .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 114 (05) :1029-1033
[9]   Risks and morbidity associated with previous cesarean section [J].
Dodd, Jodie M. ;
Crowther, Caroline A. .
WOMENS HEALTH, 2007, 3 (01) :55-61
[10]   Developing clinical prediction models: a step-by-step guide [J].
Efthimiou, Orestis ;
Seo, Michael ;
Chalkou, Konstantina ;
Debray, Thomas ;
Egger, Matthias ;
Salanti, Georgia .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 386