Efficacy of Olmesartan/Amlodipine Single-Pill Combination on 24-h Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Monitoring in Non-Responders to Valsartan or Candesartan Monotherapy

被引:0
作者
Chung, Woo-Baek [1 ,2 ]
Ihm, Sang-Hyun [2 ,3 ]
Choi, Yun-Seok [1 ,2 ]
Youn, Ho-Joong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Catholic Res Inst Intractable Cardiovasc Dis, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ Korea, Bucheon St Marys Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure measurement; antihypertensive therapy; blood pressure variability; hypertension; isolated systolic hypertension; FIXED-DOSE COMBINATION; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFICACY; OLMESARTAN MEDOXOMIL; HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS; THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; AMLODIPINE; SAFETY; KOREA;
D O I
10.1111/jch.14929
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of olmesartan/amlodipine (OLM/AML) single-pill combination (SPC) therapy using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in non-responders to valsartan or candesartan monotherapy. Isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) is the most prevalent form of hypertension in middle-aged and elderly individuals. Patients aged over 55 years who did not achieve the target systolic blood pressure (SBP < 140 mmHg) with valsartan 80 mg or candesartan 8 mg for at least 4 weeks were included. Doses were escalated from 20/5 mg to 40/5 mg and finally to 40/10 mg of OLM/AML SPC until patients reached the target SBP. Efficacy was assessed via ABPM by comparing baseline values with those in the 12th week. Office blood pressure (OBP) and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) were assessed at baseline, weeks 4, 8, and 12. Fifty-four patients (average age 64 +/- 6 years; 33 males) participated. The 24-h mean BPs decreased significantly from an average of 146.2 +/- 12.7/93.3 +/- 9.2 mmHg to 129.7 +/- 14.3/83.4 +/- 10.7 mmHg (p < 0.001), and pulse pressures (PPs) from ABPM were reduced (p < 0.001). Additionally, significant reductions in night-time SBP standard deviations (SDs) (14.7 +/- 4.7 vs. 12.5 +/- 3.9, p = 0.029) were observed at 12 weeks compared to baseline. OBPs significantly dropped from 151.1 +/- 9.7/89.3 +/- 8.3 mmHg to 125.5 +/- 13.8/77.8 +/- 8.8 mmHg after 12 weeks of SPC therapy (p < 0.001). Reductions in PPs of OBP and baPWVs were also observed. OLM/AML SPC therapy effectively reduced the 24-h mean BP, as measured by ABPM, in hypertensive patients over 55 years old who failed to achieve a target SBP (< 140 mmHg) with angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) monotherapy using valsartan 80 mg or candesartan 8 mg.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Prevalence and Trends of Isolated Systolic Hypertension among Untreated Older People in the US according to the 2017 ACC/AHA Guideline, 2001-16 [J].
Al Kibria, Gulam Muhammed .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2021, 35 (01) :101-103
[2]   Isolated Systolic Hypertension: An Update After SPRINT [J].
Bavishi, Chirag ;
Goel, Sangita ;
Messerli, Franz H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 129 (12) :1251-1258
[3]   Efficacy of olmesartan/amlodipine combination therapy in reducing ambulatory blood pressure in moderate-to-severe hypertensive patients not controlled by amlodipine alone [J].
Bilo, Grzegorz ;
Koch, Winfried ;
Hoshide, Satoshi ;
Parati, Gianfranco .
HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2014, 37 (09) :836-844
[4]   Prognostic accuracy of day versus night ambulatory blood pressure:: a cohort study [J].
Boggia, Jose ;
Li, Yan ;
Thijs, Lutgarde ;
Hansen, Tine W. ;
Kikuya, Masahiro ;
Bjorklund-Bodegard, Kristina ;
Richart, Tom ;
Ohkuba, Tkayashi ;
Kuznetsova, Tatiana ;
Torp-Pedersen, Christian ;
Lind, Lars ;
Ibsen, Hans ;
Imaiji, Yutaka ;
Wang, Jiguang ;
Sandoya, Edgardp ;
O'Brien, Eoin ;
Staessen, Jan A. .
LANCET, 2007, 370 (9594) :1219-1229
[5]   Projecting the long-term benefits of single pill combination therapy for patients with hypertension in five countries [J].
Borghi, Claudio ;
Wang, Jiguang ;
Rodionov, Anton V. ;
Rosas, Martin ;
Sohn, Il Suk ;
Alcocer, Luis ;
Valentine, William J. ;
Deroche-Chibedi, Daniela ;
Granados, Denis ;
Croce, Davide .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY CARDIOVASCULAR RISK AND PREVENTION, 2021, 10
[6]   Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil and candesartan cilexetil assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with essential hypertension [J].
Brunner, HR ;
Stumpe, KO ;
Januszewicz, A .
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2003, 23 (07) :419-430
[7]   Differences in prevalence of hypertension subtypes according to the 2018 Korean Society of Hypertension and 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines: The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2017 (KNHANES IV-VII) [J].
Cho, So Mi Jemma ;
Lee, Hokyou ;
Kim, Hyeon Chang .
CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2019, 25 (01)
[8]   Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil compared with amlodipine for mild-to-moderate hypertension [J].
Chrysant, SG ;
Marbury, TC ;
Robinson, TD .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2003, 17 (06) :425-432
[9]  
Erdine Serap, 2012, Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis, V6, P31, DOI 10.1177/1753944711432902
[10]   Effect of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure on Cardiovascular Outcomes [J].
Flint, Alexander C. ;
Conell, Carol ;
Ren, Xiushui ;
Banki, Nader M. ;
Chan, Sheila L. ;
Rao, Vivek A. ;
Melles, Ronald B. ;
Bhatt, Deepak L. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (03) :243-251