A systematic literature review on patient-reported outcome domains and measures in nonsurgical efficacy trials related to chronic pain associated with endometriosis: an urgent call to action

被引:0
作者
Rosenberger, Daniela Constanze [1 ]
Mennicken, Emilia [1 ]
Schmieg, Iris [1 ]
Medkour, Terkia [2 ]
Pechard, Marie [2 ]
Sachau, Juliane [3 ]
Fuchtmann, Fabian [1 ]
Birch, Judy [4 ]
Schnabel, Kathrin [1 ]
Vincent, Katy [5 ]
Baron, Ralf [3 ]
Bouhassira, Didier [2 ]
Pogatzki-Zahn, Esther Miriam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Muenster, Dept Anesthesiol Intens Care & Pain Med, Munster, Germany
[2] UVSQ Paris Saclay Univ, Ambroise Pare Hosp, INSERM, U987, Boulogne Billancourt, Paris, France
[3] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Neurol, Div Neurol Pain Res & Therapy, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
[4] Pelv Pain Support Network, Poole, England
[5] Univ Oxford, John Radcliffe Hosp, Nuffield Dept Womens & Reprod Hlth, Oxford, England
关键词
Chronic pelvic pain; PROMs; Systematic literature research; Endometriosis; Core outcome set; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DEPOT MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; STAGE-III-IV; CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN; ADD-BACK THERAPY; HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY; ORAL GNRH ANTAGONIST; LONG-TERM TREATMENT; LOW-DOSE DANAZOL; POSTOPERATIVE MEDICAL-TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003290
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Endometriosis, a common cause for chronic pelvic pain, significantly affects quality of life, fertility, and overall productivity of those affected. Therapeutic options remain limited, and collating evidence on treatment efficacy is complicated. One reason could be the heterogeneity of assessed outcomes in nonsurgical clinical trials, impeding meaningful result comparisons. This systematic literature review examines outcome domains and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials. Through comprehensive search of Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL up until July 2022, we screened 1286 records, of which 191 were included in our analyses. Methodological quality (GRADE criteria), information about publication, patient population, and intervention were assessed, and domains as well as PROMs were extracted and analyzed. In accordance with IMMPACT domain framework, the domain pain was assessed in almost all studies (98.4%), followed by adverse events (73.8%). By contrast, assessment of physical functioning (29.8%), improvement and satisfaction (14.1%), and emotional functioning (6.8%) occurred less frequently. Studies of a better methodological quality tended to use more different domains. Nevertheless, combinations of more than 2 domains were rare, failing to comprehensively capture the bio-psycho-social aspects of endometriosis-associated pain. The PROMs used showed an even broader heterogeneity across all studies. Our findings underscore the large heterogeneity of assessed domains and PROMs in clinical pain-related endometriosis trials. This highlights the urgent need for a standardized approach to both, assessed domains and high-quality PROMs ideally realized through development and implementation of a core outcome set, encompassing the most pivotal domains and PROMs for both, stakeholders and patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2419 / 2444
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pediatric Patients With Sport-Related Injuries: A Systematic Review
    Marshall, Ashley N.
    Root, Hayley J.
    McLeod, Tamara C. Valovich
    Lam, Kenneth C.
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2022, 57 (04) : 371 - 384
  • [22] Voice-Related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review of Instrument Development and Validation
    Francis, David O.
    Daniero, James J.
    Hovis, Kristen L.
    Sathe, Nila
    Jacobson, Barbara
    Penson, David F.
    Feurer, Irene D.
    McPheeters, Melissa L.
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2017, 60 (01): : 62 - 88
  • [23] A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia
    Goodney, Philip
    Shah, Samir
    Hu, Yiyuan David
    Suckow, Bjoern
    Kinlay, Scott
    Armstrong, David G.
    Geraghty, Patrick
    Patterson, Megan
    Menard, Matthew
    Patel, Manesh R.
    Conte, Michael S.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 75 (05) : 1762 - 1775
  • [24] Systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures used in assessment and measurement of sleep disorders in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Garrow, Adam P.
    Yorke, Janelle
    Khan, Naimat
    Vestbo, Jorgen
    Singh, Dave
    Tyson, Sarah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2015, 10 : 293 - 307
  • [25] A systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures used in gout: an evaluation of their content and measurement properties
    Janssen, Carly A.
    Voshaar, Martijn A. H. Oude
    ten Klooster, Peter M.
    Jansen, Tim L. Th. A.
    Vonkeman, Harald E.
    van de Laar, Mart A. F. J.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [26] Review The appropriateness and quality of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in plastic surgery randomized controlled trials: A systematic review
    Kim, Patrick J.
    Hircock, Caroline
    Huynh, Minh N. Q.
    Gallo, Lucas
    Thoma, Achilles
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2023, 85 : 72 - 85
  • [27] Patient-reported outcome measures for chronic wounds with particular reference to pressure ulcer research: A systematic review
    Gorecki, Claudia
    Nixon, Jane
    Lamping, Donna L.
    Alavi, Yasmene
    Brown, Julia M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2014, 51 (01) : 157 - 165
  • [28] Assessment of stigma related to visible skin diseases: a systematic review and evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures
    Luck-Sikorski, C.
    Rossmann, P.
    Topp, J.
    Augustin, M.
    Sommer, R.
    Weinberger, N. A.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2022, 36 (04) : 499 - 525
  • [29] The minimal important difference of patient-reported outcome measures related to female urinary incontinence: a systematic review
    Barbosa-Silva, Jordana
    Calixtre, Leticia Bojikian
    Von Piekartz, Daniela
    Driusso, Patricia
    Armijo-Olivo, Susan
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [30] Factors in Randomized Controlled Trials Reported to Impact the Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Into Routine Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review
    Roberts, Natasha Anne
    Alexander, Kimberly
    Wyld, David
    Janda, Monika
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2019, 8 (11):