A systematic literature review on patient-reported outcome domains and measures in nonsurgical efficacy trials related to chronic pain associated with endometriosis: an urgent call to action

被引:0
|
作者
Rosenberger, Daniela Constanze [1 ]
Mennicken, Emilia [1 ]
Schmieg, Iris [1 ]
Medkour, Terkia [2 ]
Pechard, Marie [2 ]
Sachau, Juliane [3 ]
Fuchtmann, Fabian [1 ]
Birch, Judy [4 ]
Schnabel, Kathrin [1 ]
Vincent, Katy [5 ]
Baron, Ralf [3 ]
Bouhassira, Didier [2 ]
Pogatzki-Zahn, Esther Miriam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Muenster, Dept Anesthesiol Intens Care & Pain Med, Munster, Germany
[2] UVSQ Paris Saclay Univ, Ambroise Pare Hosp, INSERM, U987, Boulogne Billancourt, Paris, France
[3] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Neurol, Div Neurol Pain Res & Therapy, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
[4] Pelv Pain Support Network, Poole, England
[5] Univ Oxford, John Radcliffe Hosp, Nuffield Dept Womens & Reprod Hlth, Oxford, England
关键词
Chronic pelvic pain; PROMs; Systematic literature research; Endometriosis; Core outcome set; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DEPOT MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; STAGE-III-IV; CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN; ADD-BACK THERAPY; HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY; ORAL GNRH ANTAGONIST; LONG-TERM TREATMENT; LOW-DOSE DANAZOL; POSTOPERATIVE MEDICAL-TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003290
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Endometriosis, a common cause for chronic pelvic pain, significantly affects quality of life, fertility, and overall productivity of those affected. Therapeutic options remain limited, and collating evidence on treatment efficacy is complicated. One reason could be the heterogeneity of assessed outcomes in nonsurgical clinical trials, impeding meaningful result comparisons. This systematic literature review examines outcome domains and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials. Through comprehensive search of Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL up until July 2022, we screened 1286 records, of which 191 were included in our analyses. Methodological quality (GRADE criteria), information about publication, patient population, and intervention were assessed, and domains as well as PROMs were extracted and analyzed. In accordance with IMMPACT domain framework, the domain pain was assessed in almost all studies (98.4%), followed by adverse events (73.8%). By contrast, assessment of physical functioning (29.8%), improvement and satisfaction (14.1%), and emotional functioning (6.8%) occurred less frequently. Studies of a better methodological quality tended to use more different domains. Nevertheless, combinations of more than 2 domains were rare, failing to comprehensively capture the bio-psycho-social aspects of endometriosis-associated pain. The PROMs used showed an even broader heterogeneity across all studies. Our findings underscore the large heterogeneity of assessed domains and PROMs in clinical pain-related endometriosis trials. This highlights the urgent need for a standardized approach to both, assessed domains and high-quality PROMs ideally realized through development and implementation of a core outcome set, encompassing the most pivotal domains and PROMs for both, stakeholders and patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2419 / 2444
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The rheumatoid foot: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures
    Walmsley, Steven
    Williams, Anita E.
    Ravey, Mike
    Graham, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2010, 3
  • [2] Psychometric properties and domains covered by patient-reported outcome measures used in trials assessing interventions for chronic pain
    Alebouyeh, Farzaneh
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Ravaud, Philippe
    Tran, Viet-Thi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 170
  • [3] A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
    S. Ishaque
    J. Karnon
    G. Chen
    R. Nair
    A. B. Salter
    Quality of Life Research, 2019, 28 : 567 - 592
  • [4] The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review
    Michelle M. Holmes
    George Lewith
    David Newell
    Jonathan Field
    Felicity L. Bishop
    Quality of Life Research, 2017, 26 : 245 - 257
  • [5] A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
    Ishaque, S.
    Karnon, J.
    Chen, G.
    Nair, R.
    Salter, A. B.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (03) : 567 - 592
  • [6] The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review
    Holmes, Michelle M.
    Lewith, George
    Newell, David
    Field, Jonathan
    Bishop, Felicity L.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (02) : 245 - 257
  • [7] Diabetic foot disease: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures
    Perez-Panero, Alberto J.
    Ruiz-Munoz, Maria
    Fernandez-Torres, Raul
    Formosa, Cynthia
    Gatt, Alfred
    Gonzalez-Sanchez, Manuel
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (12) : 3395 - 3405
  • [8] A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media
    Phillips, John S.
    Yung, Matthew W.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2016, 126 (06) : 1458 - 1463
  • [9] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review
    Houston, Megan N.
    Hoch, Johanna M.
    Hoch, Matthew C.
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2015, 50 (10) : 1019 - 1033
  • [10] A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Facial Cosmetic Surgery and/or Nonsurgical Facial Rejuvenation
    Kosowski, Tomasz R.
    McCarthy, Colleen
    Reavey, Patrick L.
    Scott, Amie M.
    Wilkins, Edwin G.
    Cano, Stefan J.
    Klassen, Anne F.
    Carr, Nicholas
    Cordeiro, Peter G.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 123 (06) : 1819 - 1827