Aspect-level Sentiment Analysis Based on Heterogeneous Spatial-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks

被引:0
作者
Jin, Mengqing [1 ]
Wang, Xun [1 ]
Xu, Changlin [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ Sci Technol, Sch Comp, Zhenjiang 212003, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF 2024 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER SECURITY, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DIGITAL ECONOMY, CSAIDE 2024 | 2024年
关键词
Aspect-level sentiment analysis; Spatial-temporal graph convolutional network; Attention mechanism; Syntactic dependency;
D O I
10.1145/3672919.3672987
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
As a subtask of fine-grained sentiment analysis, aspect-level sentiment analysis aims to predict the sentiment polarity of aspect words. In recent years, more and more research achievements had been made in this field, but most of the existing methods basically only considered the unified modeling of a paragraph, and the lack of correlation between sentences. The recognition and analysis of emotion not only depended on the content of the sentence itself, but also depended on the emotional fluctuations of the sentence over time. To solve this problem, this paper proposed an aspect-level sentiment analysis model based on Heterogeneous Spatial -Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks (H-STGCN). The model first utilized Bi-LSTM and syntactic dependency tree to model the context, and then constructs each clause as a spatial- temporal graph convolutional network. The attention mechanism calculated the propagation weights, enhancing the feature expression of target aspect words in both time and space dimensions. Experimental results show that the model performs better than the control model on public datasets.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 374
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   LSTM-GateCNN network for Aspect sentiment analysis [J].
Cao, Shuhua ;
Gao, Pengxiang .
2020 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCE, COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY AND TRANSPORTATION (ISCTT 2020), 2020, :443-447
[2]  
Dong L, 2014, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 52ND ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, VOL 2, P49
[3]  
Fan FF, 2018, 2018 CONFERENCE ON EMPIRICAL METHODS IN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING (EMNLP 2018), P3433
[4]  
Li Ruifan., 2021, P 59 ANN M ASS COMP, P6319, DOI DOI 10.18653/V1/2021.ACL-LONG.494
[5]  
Zhang M, 2020, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CONFERENCE ON EMPIRICAL METHODS IN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING (EMNLP), P3540
[6]  
Pontiki M., 2015, P 9 INT WORKSHOP SEM, P486, DOI [10.18653/v1/s15-2082, DOI 10.18653/V1/S15-2082, DOI 10.18653/V1]
[7]  
Pontiki M., 2014, P 8 INT WORKSHOP SEM, P27, DOI [10.3115/v1/S14-2004, 10.3115/v1/s14-2004, DOI 10.3115/V1/S14-2004]
[8]  
Pontiki M., 2016, INT WORKSHOP SEMANTI, P19, DOI [10.18653/v1/s16-1002, DOI 10.18653/V1/S16-1002]
[9]  
Wang Y., 2016, P 2016 C EMPIRICAL M, P606
[10]  
Yan SJ, 2018, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, P7444