Comparative Analysis of Metaheuristic Algorithms for Procedural Race Track Generation in Games

被引:0
|
作者
Alyaseri, Sana [1 ]
Conner, Andy [2 ]
机构
[1] Whitecliffe Coll, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Auckland Univ Technol, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Procedural Content Generation (PCG); Genetic Algorithms (GAs); Genetic algorithms; Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO); Artificial Bee Colony (ABC); Metaheuristics; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; PSO; PERFORMANCE; ABC; GA;
D O I
10.4018/IJAMC.350330
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Procedural Content Generation (PCG) aims to automatically generate the content of games using algorithmic approaches, as this can reduce the cost of game design and development. PCG algorithms can be applied to all elements of a game, including terrain, maps, stories, dialogues, quests, and characters. A wide variety of search algorithms can be applied to PCG problems; however, those most often used are variations of evolutionary algorithms. This study focuses on comparing three metaheuristic approaches applied to racetrack games, with the specific goal of evaluating the effectiveness of different algorithms in producing game content. To that end, a Genetic Algorithm (GA), Artificial Bee Colony (ABC), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) are applied to a game-level design task to attempt to identify any discernible differences in their performance and identify whether alternative algorithms offer desirable performance characteristics. The results of the study indicate that both the ABC and PSO approaches offer potential advantages to Genetic Algorithm implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 30
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Comparative Analysis of Metaheuristic Approaches for Multidimensional Two-Way Number Partitioning Problem
    Hacibeyoglu, Mehmet
    Alaykiran, Kemal
    Acilar, Ayse Merve
    Tongur, Vahit
    Ulker, Erkan
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 43 (12) : 7499 - 7520
  • [42] A Comparative Study of Eighteen Self-adaptive Metaheuristic Algorithms for Truss Sizing Optimisation
    Pholdee, Nantiwat
    Bureerat, Sujin
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 22 (08) : 2982 - 2993
  • [43] A Comparative Analysis of Metaheuristic Approaches for Multidimensional Two-Way Number Partitioning Problem
    Mehmet Hacibeyoglu
    Kemal Alaykiran
    Ayse Merve Acilar
    Vahit Tongur
    Erkan Ulker
    Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2018, 43 : 7499 - 7520
  • [44] Performance Analysis of Metaheuristic Technique Based Decoding Algorithms for Block Codes
    Kolisetty, Harish
    Vadlamudi, Sai Vamsi Krishna
    Chennam, Vamsi Krishna
    Raju, Reddy R.
    Reddy, Bhargav Anand S.
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICCSP), 2017, : 70 - 75
  • [45] Comprehensive analysis of optimal power flow using recent metaheuristic algorithms
    Diab, Ahmed A. Zaki
    Abdelhamid, Ashraf M.
    Sultan, Hamdy M.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [46] An analysis on the performance of metaheuristic algorithms for the estimation of parameters in solar cell models
    Navarro, Mario A.
    Oliva, Diego
    Ramos-Michel, Alfonso
    Haro, Eduardo H.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 276
  • [47] Quantum-inspired metaheuristic algorithms for Industry 4.0: A scientometric analysis
    Pooja
    Sood, Sandeep Kumar
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2025, 139
  • [48] A comparative analysis on parametric optimization of abrasive water jet machining processes using foraging behavior-based metaheuristic algorithms
    Pendokhare, Devendra
    Nandi, Somnath
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    OPSEARCH, 2025,
  • [49] Multi-project scheduling: A benchmark analysis of metaheuristic algorithms on various optimisation criteria and due dates
    Bredael, Dries
    Vanhoucke, Mario
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 308 (01) : 54 - 75
  • [50] Comparative Analysis of Genetic Algorithms and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms for Optimal Reservoir Operation
    Yun, Ruan
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2011, 90-93 : 2727 - 2733