General Obstacle Avoidance Capability Assessment for Autonomous Vehicles

被引:0
作者
Lowe, Evan [1 ]
Guvenc, Levent [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Automated Driving Lab, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
来源
ELECTRONICS | 2024年 / 13卷 / 24期
关键词
autonomous vehicle; active road object; emergency obstacle avoidance maneuver; vulnerable road user; vehicle-to-vehicle; V2V;
D O I
10.3390/electronics13244901
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
As autonomous vehicle (AV) capabilities expand, it is important to ensure their safety during testing and deployment for public usage. While several testing regulations have been proposed in research, US federal, and even global guidelines for low-speed vehicles in metropolitan settings, regulations for high-speed travel are mainly vacant-this is especially true for regulations relating to AV emergency obstacle avoidance maneuvers (EOAMs). Research in this manuscript introduces a general obstacle avoidance capability assessment (GOACA) for AVs traveling at highway speeds. This GOACA includes test modes including car and bicycle active road objects (AROs) in rural and urban highway settings. These tests were novel in their definitions, methodologies, and execution, especially in the context of AVs driving at highway speeds-critically, this research proposes a test evaluation protocol such that it could serve as a foundation for an official regulation in the future. These GOACA tests included adjacent traffic vehicles which have not been utilized in the prior literature when considering EOAMs within a wholistic AV system context. While the vehicle type will cause simulation results to var, in general, vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication is recommended for usage with AVs at highway speeds for critical safety. This is especially true when considering oncoming traffic and low surface mu conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2021, Mechanical Simulation Using CarSim to Simulate Euro NCAP ACC Tests Video
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, Soft Car 360 - Global Vehicle Target (GVT) for Driver Assistance and Autonomous Driving Systems
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, Intersection Conflict Warning System Human Factors: Final Report
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP)
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2018, LaunchPad - ADAS testing for Vulnerable Road Users
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2018, Transportation Research Center Proving Ground
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2008, Laboratory Test Procedure for FMVSS 208, Occupant Crash Protection (Tp208-14)
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2021, Best Practice for Metrics and Methods for Assessing Safety Performance of Automated Driving Systems (ADS)
  • [9] Bhuiyan J., 2018, Ubers semi-autonomous car detected the pedestrian six seconds before the fatal crash, a federal agency says
  • [10] Blumenthal MS., 2020, Safe Enough: Approaches to Assessing Acceptable Safety for Automated Vehicles