Prediction of Prostate Cancer Grades Using Radiomic Features

被引:0
|
作者
Yamamoto, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Haraguchi, Takafumi [3 ]
Matsuda, Kaori [1 ]
Okazaki, Yoshio [1 ]
Kimoto, Shin [1 ]
Tanji, Nozomu [2 ]
Matsumoto, Atsushi [2 ]
Kobayashi, Yasuyuki [4 ]
Mimura, Hidefumi [5 ]
Hiraki, Takao [6 ]
机构
[1] Houshasen Daiichi Hosp, Dept Radiol, Imabari, Ehime 7940054, Japan
[2] Houshasen Daiichi Hosp, Dept Urol, Imabari, Ehime 7940054, Japan
[3] St Marianna Univ, Sch Med, Dept Adv Biomed Imaging & Informat, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2168511, Japan
[4] St Marianna Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med Informat & Commun Technol Res, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2168511, Japan
[5] St Marianna Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2168511, Japan
[6] Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Radiol, Okayama 7008558, Japan
关键词
prostate cancer; machine learning; prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System; radiomics; Gleason score;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
We developed a machine learning model for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) grades using radiomic features of magnetic resonance imaging. 112 patients diagnosed with PCa based on prostate biopsy between January 2014 and December 2021 were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to construct two prediction models, one using radiomic features and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values (Radiomics model) and the other Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores and PSA values (PI-RADS model), to differentiate high-grade (Gleason score [GS] >= 8) from intermediate or low-grade (GS <8) PCa. Five imaging features were selected for the Radiomics model using the Gini coefficient. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. The models were compared by leave-one-out cross-validation with Ridge regularization. Furthermore, the Radiomics model was evaluated using the holdout method and represented by a nomogram. The AUC of the Radiomics and PI-RADS models differed significantly (0.799, 95% CI: 0.712-0.869; and 0.710, 95% CI: 0.617-0.792, respectively). Using holdout method, the Radiomics model yielded AUC of 0.778 (95% CI: 0.552-0.925), sensitivity of 0.769, and specificity of 0.778. It outperformed the PI-RADS model and could be useful in predicting PCa grades, potentially aiding in determining appropriate treatment approaches in PCa patients.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 30
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Overall Survival Prediction in Glioblastoma With Radiomic Features Using Machine Learning
    Baid, Ujjwal
    Rane, Swapnil U.
    Talbar, Sanjay
    Gupta, Sudeep
    Thakur, Meenakshi H.
    Moiyadi, Aliasgar
    Mahajan, Abhishek
    FRONTIERS IN COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 14
  • [42] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Radiomic Models of Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review
    Chaddad, Ahmad
    Kucharczyk, Michael J.
    Cheddad, Abbas
    Clarke, Sharon E.
    Hassan, Lama
    Ding, Shuxue
    Rathore, Saima
    Zhang, Mingli
    Katib, Yousef
    Bahoric, Boris
    Abikhzer, Gad
    Probst, Stephan
    Niazi, Tamim
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (03) : 1 - 22
  • [43] Machine-learning with region-level radiomic and dosimetric features for predicting radiotherapy-induced rectal toxicities in prostate cancer patients
    Yang, Zhuolin
    Noble, David J.
    Shelley, Leila
    Berger, Thomas
    Jena, Raj
    McLaren, Duncan B.
    Burnet, Neil G.
    Nailon, William H.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 183
  • [44] T2-Weighted MRI Radiomic Features Predict Prostate Cancer Presence and Eventual Biochemical Recurrence
    Duenweg, Savannah R.
    Bobholz, Samuel A.
    Barrett, Michael J.
    Lowman, Allison K.
    Winiarz, Aleksandra
    Nath, Biprojit
    Stebbins, Margaret
    Bukowy, John
    Iczkowski, Kenneth A.
    Jacobsohn, Kenneth M.
    Vincent-Sheldon, Stephanie
    Laviolette, Peter S.
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [45] Homology-based approach for prognostic prediction of lung cancer using novel topologically invariant radiomic features
    Ninomiya, K.
    Arimura, H.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2020: IMAGE PROCESSING, 2021, 11313
  • [46] Machine and Deep Learning Algorithms for COVID-19 Mortality Prediction Using Clinical and Radiomic Features
    Verzellesi, Laura
    Botti, Andrea
    Bertolini, Marco
    Trojani, Valeria
    Carlini, Gianluca
    Nitrosi, Andrea
    Monelli, Filippo
    Besutti, Giulia
    Castellani, Gastone
    Remondini, Daniel
    Milanese, Gianluca
    Croci, Stefania
    Sverzellati, Nicola
    Salvarani, Carlo
    Iori, Mauro
    ELECTRONICS, 2023, 12 (18)
  • [47] Prenatal prediction and typing of placental invasion using MRI deep and radiomic features
    Rongrong Xuan
    Tao Li
    Yutao Wang
    Jian Xu
    Wei Jin
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 20
  • [48] Multiparametric MRI and Machine Learning Based Radiomic Models for Preoperative Prediction of Multiple Biological Characteristics in Prostate Cancer
    Fan, Xuhui
    Xie, Ni
    Chen, Jingwen
    Li, Tiewen
    Cao, Rong
    Yu, Hongwei
    He, Meijuan
    Wang, Zilin
    Wang, Yihui
    Liu, Hao
    Wang, Han
    Yin, Xiaorui
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [49] Prediction of the Acuity of Vertebral Compression Fractures on CT Using Radiologic and Radiomic Features
    Kim, A. Yeon
    Yoon, Min A.
    Ham, Su Jung
    Cho, Young Chul
    Ko, Yousun
    Park, Bumwoo
    Kim, Seonok
    Lee, Eugene
    Lee, Ro Woon
    Chee, Choong Guen
    Lee, Min Hee
    Lee, Sang Hoon
    Chung, Hye Won
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (10) : 1512 - 1520
  • [50] Prenatal prediction and typing of placental invasion using MRI deep and radiomic features
    Xuan, Rongrong
    Li, Tao
    Wang, Yutao
    Xu, Jian
    Jin, Wei
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2021, 20 (01)