Prediction of Prostate Cancer Grades Using Radiomic Features

被引:0
|
作者
Yamamoto, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Haraguchi, Takafumi [3 ]
Matsuda, Kaori [1 ]
Okazaki, Yoshio [1 ]
Kimoto, Shin [1 ]
Tanji, Nozomu [2 ]
Matsumoto, Atsushi [2 ]
Kobayashi, Yasuyuki [4 ]
Mimura, Hidefumi [5 ]
Hiraki, Takao [6 ]
机构
[1] Houshasen Daiichi Hosp, Dept Radiol, Imabari, Ehime 7940054, Japan
[2] Houshasen Daiichi Hosp, Dept Urol, Imabari, Ehime 7940054, Japan
[3] St Marianna Univ, Sch Med, Dept Adv Biomed Imaging & Informat, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2168511, Japan
[4] St Marianna Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med Informat & Commun Technol Res, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2168511, Japan
[5] St Marianna Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2168511, Japan
[6] Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Radiol, Okayama 7008558, Japan
关键词
prostate cancer; machine learning; prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System; radiomics; Gleason score;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
We developed a machine learning model for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) grades using radiomic features of magnetic resonance imaging. 112 patients diagnosed with PCa based on prostate biopsy between January 2014 and December 2021 were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to construct two prediction models, one using radiomic features and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values (Radiomics model) and the other Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores and PSA values (PI-RADS model), to differentiate high-grade (Gleason score [GS] >= 8) from intermediate or low-grade (GS <8) PCa. Five imaging features were selected for the Radiomics model using the Gini coefficient. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. The models were compared by leave-one-out cross-validation with Ridge regularization. Furthermore, the Radiomics model was evaluated using the holdout method and represented by a nomogram. The AUC of the Radiomics and PI-RADS models differed significantly (0.799, 95% CI: 0.712-0.869; and 0.710, 95% CI: 0.617-0.792, respectively). Using holdout method, the Radiomics model yielded AUC of 0.778 (95% CI: 0.552-0.925), sensitivity of 0.769, and specificity of 0.778. It outperformed the PI-RADS model and could be useful in predicting PCa grades, potentially aiding in determining appropriate treatment approaches in PCa patients.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 30
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of Glioma Grades Using Deep Learning with Wavelet Radiomic Features
    Cinarer, Gokalp
    Emiroglu, Bulent Gursel
    Yurttakal, Ahmet Hasim
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (18):
  • [2] Repeatability of CBCT radiomic features and their correlation with CT radiomic features for prostate cancer
    Delgadillo, Rodrigo
    Spieler, Benjamin O.
    Ford, John C.
    Kwon, Deukwoo
    Yang, Fei
    Studenski, Matthew
    Padgett, Kyle R.
    Abramowitz, Matthew C.
    Dal Pra, Alan
    Stoyanova, Radka
    Pollack, Alan
    Dogan, Nesrin
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (05) : 2386 - 2399
  • [3] Multimodal Radiomic Features for the Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer
    Chaddad, Ahmad
    Kucharczyk, Michael J.
    Niazi, Tamim
    CANCERS, 2018, 10 (08)
  • [4] The role of PET radiomic features in prostate cancer: a systematic review
    Quartuccio, Natale
    Marrale, Maurizio
    Laudicella, Riccardo
    Alongi, Pierpaolo
    Siracusa, Massimiliano
    Sturiale, Letterio
    Arnone, Giuseppe
    Cutaia, Giuseppe
    Salvaggio, Giuseppe
    Midiri, Massimo
    Baldari, Sergio
    Arnone, Gaspare
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL IMAGING, 2021, 9 (06) : 579 - 588
  • [5] The role of PET radiomic features in prostate cancer: a systematic review
    Natale Quartuccio
    Maurizio Marrale
    Riccardo Laudicella
    Pierpaolo Alongi
    Massimiliano Siracusa
    Letterio Sturiale
    Giuseppe Arnone
    Giuseppe Cutaia
    Giuseppe Salvaggio
    Massimo Midiri
    Sergio Baldari
    Gaspare Arnone
    Clinical and Translational Imaging, 2021, 9 : 579 - 588
  • [6] Prediction of Gleason score in prostate cancer patients based on radiomic features of transrectal ultrasound images
    Cheng, Tao
    Li, Huiming
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 97 (1154) : 415 - 421
  • [7] Multiple Kernel Learning applied to the prediction of prostate cancer recurrence from MRI radiomic features
    Marin-Castrillon, Diana M.
    Fontaine, Pierre
    Gnep, Khemara
    de Crevoisier, Renaud
    Diaz, Gloria M.
    Acosta, Oscar
    2019 IEEE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOENGINEERING (BIBE), 2019, : 984 - 988
  • [8] Prediction of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer by MRI radiomic signature: a systematic review
    Guerra, Adalgisa
    Wang, Helen
    Orton, Matthew R.
    Konidari, Marianna
    Papanikolaou, Nickolas K.
    Koh, Dow Mu
    Donato, Helena
    Alves, Filipe Caseiro
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2024, 15 (01):
  • [9] May Radiomic Data Predict Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness?
    Germanese, Danila
    Colantonio, Sara
    Caudai, Claudia
    Pascali, Maria Antonietta
    Barucci, Andrea
    Zoppetti, Nicola
    Agostini, Simone
    Bertelli, Elena
    Mercatelli, Laura
    Miele, Vittorio
    Carpi, Roberto
    COMPUTER ANALYSIS OF IMAGES AND PATTERNS (CAIP 2019), 2019, 1089 : 65 - 75
  • [10] Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer Patients Using Radiomic Analysis
    Chaddad, Ahmad
    Niazi, Tamim
    Probst, Stephan
    Bladou, Franck
    Anidjar, Maurice
    Bahoric, Boris
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2018, 8