A Comprehensive Analysis of Safety Predictors in Construction Sites: A DEMATEL-Based Model

被引:1
作者
Kang, Chun Xiang [1 ]
Chai, Changsaar [2 ,3 ]
Lee, Chia Kuang [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaysia Pahang Al Sultan Abdullah, Fac Ind Management, Kuantan 26300, Pahang, Malaysia
[2] Taylors Univ, Fac Innovat & Technol, Sch Architecture Bldg & Design, Subang Jaya 47500, Selangor, Malaysia
[3] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Inst Smart Infrastruct & Innovat Construct ISI, UTM Construct Res Ctr UTM CRC, Utm Johor Bahru 81310, Johor, Malaysia
关键词
Safety predictors; Safety compliance intention; Safety participation; DEMATEL; Theory of Planned Behaviour; WORKPLACE SAFETY; SELF-EFFICACY; CLIMATE; RISK; PERFORMANCE; MOTIVATION; LEADERSHIP; BEHAVIORS; SYSTEM; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.21315/jcdc.2024.29.S1.2
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The construction industry, vital for economic growth and human capital development, faces significant safety challenges, particularly in the Malaysian context. Despite technological advancements, addressing safety concerns necessitates a deeper understanding of behavioural interventions. This study explores the critical factors influencing safety compliance intention and safety participation in the Malaysian construction industry, utilising the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) as its theoretical framework. TPB posits that actual behaviour can be predicted by intention, while the formation of intention is mainly determined by attitude, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control. Despite the posited framework considering TPB, there is no evidence to prove the correlation between safety predictors, safety compliance intention and safety participation. This study examines the influence of safety predictors on safety compliance intention and safety participation by using the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique. Based on the DEMATEL technique, 25 experts were invited to provide pairwise ranking on the predictors influencing safety compliance intention and safety participation. The predictors examined in the study include "Attitude", "Subjective norm", "Perceived behavioural control", "Types of leadership styles", "Safety knowledge", "Safety climate", "Safety motivation", "Risk perception" and "Communication". Among these predictors, the study revealed significant relationships between all safety predictors, with "Attitude" emerging as the most impactful predictor. Organisations should prioritise this to enhance safety performance. Safety performance in construction projects can be improved and intervened in when the interrelationships between safety predictors, safety compliance intention and safety participation are fully understood.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 58
页数:22
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
AJZEN I, 1980, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU
[3]  
Albarkani M.S.S., 2021, Journal of Technology Management and Business, V8, P79, DOI [10.30880/jtmb.2021.08.02.008, DOI 10.30880/JTMB.2021.08.02.008]
[4]   SAFE BEHAVIOR AND SAFETY MOTIVATION [J].
ANDRIESSEN, JHTH .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENTS, 1978, 1 (04) :363-376
[5]   Regulatory focus and safety outcomes: An examination of the mediating influence of safety behavior [J].
Aryee, Samuel ;
Hsiung, Hsin-Hua .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2016, 86 :27-35
[6]  
Asilian-Mahabadi H., 2020, INT J OCCUP SAF ERGO, V26, P219, DOI [10.1080/10803548.2017.1408243, DOI 10.1080/10803548.2017.1408243]
[7]  
Avolio BJ., 2004, Multifactor leadership questionnaire
[8]   Does safety climate predict safety performance in Italy and the USA? Cross-cultural validation of a theoretical model of safety climate [J].
Barbaranelli, Claudio ;
Petitta, Laura ;
Probst, Tahira M. .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2015, 77 :35-44
[9]  
Borman W.C., 1993, PERSONNEL SELECTION, DOI DOI 10.1007/SPRINGERREFERENCE_7472
[10]   Multilevel approach to organizational and group safety climate and safety performance: Co-workers as the missing link [J].
Brondino, Margherita ;
Silva, Silvia A. ;
Pasini, Margherita .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2012, 50 (09) :1847-1856