Unravelling social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS) - four approaches to studying social media through the critical lens

被引:0
作者
Kopf, Susanne [1 ]
机构
[1] WU Vienna Univ Econ & Business, Welthandelspl 1, A-1020 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Social media; social media research classification scheme; critical discourse studies (CDS); social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS); social media communicative paradigm; social media providers; discourse about social media; theorisation and contextualisation of social media; FACEBOOK;
D O I
10.1080/17405904.2025.2463622
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This paper explores the evolution of Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM-CDS) and, in this context, outlines four essential approaches for critical research on social media and the underlying communicative paradigm. Thus, the paper adds to existing research in two ways. First, it provides a conceptualisation and visualisation that integrates Digital Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies, and the critical discourse-analytical study of social media. Second, taking this as a springboard, the paper proposes a classification scheme for past and future critical research on social media. The paper argues that critical discourse-analytical work should encompass at least four approaches: (1) using social media as repositories of data, (2) contextualising and theorising social media, focusing on (3) discourse produced by social media providers and (4) discourse about social media. In addition to discussing the scope of each approach, the paper elucidates their epistemological value. Overall, the article finds that critical engagement with social media has predominantly focused only on two of these approaches, highlighting the importance of expanding existing social media research with an eye to the additional key approaches identified.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Allan Richard., 2017, Hard questions: Who should decide what is hate speech in an online global community?
[2]  
BARON NS, 1984, VISIBLE LANG, V18, P118
[3]   Beyond the online offline distinction: Entry points to digital discourse [J].
Bolander, Brook ;
Locher, Miriam A. .
DISCOURSE CONTEXT & MEDIA, 2020, 35
[4]  
Bou-Franch Patricia., 2019, Analyzing Digital Discourse New Insights and Future Directions: New Insights and Future Directions, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6
[5]  
Bouvier G., 2018, REV COMMUNICATION, V18, P178, DOI [DOI 10.1080/15358593.2018.1479881, 10.1080/15358593.2018.1479881]
[6]   Speaking to algorithms? Rhetorical political analysis as technological analysis [J].
Dillet, Benoit .
POLITICS, 2022, 42 (02) :231-246
[7]  
Ean L. C., 2011, The Journal of the South East Asia Research Centre for Communication and Humanities, P1
[8]  
Fairclough N., 1993, Discourse and social change, VNew edition
[9]  
Fairclough Norman., 1997, DISCOURSE SOCIAL INT, V2, P258, DOI 10.4135/9781446289068.n17
[10]   INTERACTIVE WRITTEN DISCOURSE AS AN EMERGENT REGISTER [J].
FERRARA, K ;
BRUNNER, H ;
WHITTEMORE, G .
WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, 1991, 8 (01) :8-34