Clinical Pilot of a Deep Learning Elastic Registration Algorithm to Improve Misregistration Artifact and Image Quality on Routine Oncologic PET/CT

被引:0
作者
Chamberlin, Jordan H. [1 ]
Schaefferkoetter, Joshua [2 ]
Hamill, James [2 ]
Kabakus, Ismail M. [1 ]
Horn, Kevin P. [1 ]
O'Doherty, Jim [1 ,3 ]
Elojeimy, Saeed [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Radiol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Siemens Med Solut USA Inc, 810 Innovat Dr, Knoxville, TN 37932 USA
[3] Siemens Med Solut USA Inc, 40 Liberty Blvd, Malvern, PA 19355 USA
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; PET/CT; Deep Learning; Misregistration Artifact; Elastic Registration; ATTENUATION-CORRECTION; CT IMAGES; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.044
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: Misregistration artifacts between the PET and attenuation correction CT (CTAC) exams can degrade image quality and cause diagnostic errors. Deep learning (DL)-warped elastic registration methods have been proposed to improve misregistration errors. Materials and Methods: 30 patients undergoing routine oncologic examination (20 F-18-FDG PET/CT and 10 Cu-64-DOTATATE PET/CT) were retrospectively identified and compared using unmodified CTAC, and a DL-augmented spatial transformation CT attenuation map. Primary endpoints included differences in subjective image quality and standardized uptake values (SUV). Exams were randomized to reduce reader bias, and three radiologists rated image quality across six anatomic sites using a modified Likert scale. Measures of local bias and lesion SUV were also quantitatively evaluated. Results: The DL attenuation correction methods were associated with higher image quality and reduced misregistration artifacts (Mean F-18-FDG quality rating=3.5-3.8 for DL vs 3.2-3.5 for standard reconstruction (STD); Mean Cu-64-DOTATATE quality rating= 3.2-3.4 for DL vs 2.1-3.3; P < 0.05 for STD, for all except Cu-64-DOTATATE inferior spleen). Percent change in superior liver SUVmean for F-18-FDG and Cu-64-DOTATATE were 5.3 +/- 4.9 and 8.2 +/- 4.1%, respectively. Measures of signal-to-noise ratio were significantly improved for the DL over STD (Hepatopulmonary index (HPI) [F-18-FDG] = 4.5 +/- 1.2 vs 4.0 +/- 1.1, P < 0.001; HPI [Cu-64-DOTATATE] = 16.4 +/- 16.9 vs 12.5 +/- 5.5, P = 0.039). Conclusion: Deep learning elastic registration for CT attenuation correction maps on routine oncology PET/CT decreases misregistration artifacts, with a greater impact on PET scans with longer acquisition times.
引用
收藏
页码:1015 / 1025
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   A Systematic Review of the Factors Affecting Accuracy of SUV Measurements [J].
Adams, Michael C. ;
Turkington, Timothy G. ;
Wilson, Joshua M. ;
Wong, Terence Z. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (02) :310-320
[2]   Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study [J].
Akamatsu, Go ;
Ikari, Yasuhiko ;
Nishida, Hiroyuki ;
Nishio, Tomoyuki ;
Ohnishi, Akihito ;
Maebatake, Akira ;
Sasaki, Masayuki ;
Senda, Michio .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 43 (03) :222-226
[3]   Cine CT for attenuation correction in cardiac PET/CT [J].
Alessio, Adam M. ;
Kohmyer, Steve ;
Branch, Kelley ;
Chen, Grace ;
Caldwell, James ;
Kinahan, Paul .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2007, 48 (05) :794-801
[4]   Issues, controversies, and clinical utility of combined PET/CT imaging: What is the interpreting physician facing? [J].
Blodgett, TM ;
Casagranda, B ;
Townsend, DW ;
Meltzer, CC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (05) :S138-S145
[5]   PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients [J].
Burger, C ;
Goerres, G ;
Schoenes, S ;
Buck, A ;
Lonn, AHR ;
von Schulthess, GK .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2002, 29 (07) :922-927
[6]   Hepatic entropy and uniformity: additional parameters that can potentially increase the effectiveness of contrast enhancement during abdominal CT [J].
Ganeshan, B. ;
Miles, K. A. ;
Young, R. C. D. ;
Chatwin, C. R. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2007, 62 (08) :761-768
[7]   Limitations of CT during PET/CT [J].
Gollub, Marc J. ;
Hong, Richard ;
Sarasohn, Debra M. ;
Akhurst, Tim .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2007, 48 (10) :1583-1591
[8]   PET diagnostic accuracy: Improvement with in-line PET-CT system: Initial results [J].
Hany, TF ;
Steinert, HC ;
Goerres, GW ;
Buck, A ;
von Schulthess, GK .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (02) :575-581
[9]  
Jim H, 2023, J Nucl Med, V64, pP483
[10]  
Ju L, Deep learning features and metabolic tumor volume based on PET/CT to construct risk stratification in non-small cell lung cancer, DOI [10.1016/j.acra.2024.04.036.S1076-6332(24)00245-9, DOI 10.1016/J.ACRA.2024.04.036.S1076-6332(24)00245-9]