Investigating relationships among students' affective, behavioral and cognitive engagement with peer feedback on EFL writing

被引:0
作者
Chen, Haitao [1 ]
Hu, Guangwei [2 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept English & Commun, AG430,Core A, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Students' engagement; Peer feedback; Feedback givers; Feedback receivers; EFL writing; WRITTEN-CORRECTIVE-FEEDBACK; PROFICIENCY; LEARNERS; TEACHER;
D O I
10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101430
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study adopted a mixed-methods design to examine how feedback givers'/receivers' affective, behavioral and cognitive engagement with peer feedback were related to each other. One hundred and twenty-four Englishmajor sophomores, purposively sampled based on their English proficiency and willingness to participate, responded to questionnaires administered at the beginning and the end of a 16-week writing course to gauge their engagement with peer feedback. Eight of them participated in stimulated recalls conducted to explore, in depth, the relationships among types of engagement with peer feedback. Analyses of the questionnaire data revealed significant positive and negative correlations of varying strength among different types of engagement for feedback givers and receivers. Analyses of the stimulated recalls yielded further evidence that feedback givers'/receivers' behavioral, cognitive and affective engagement were interrelated in complex ways. These findings have pedagogical implications for the enhancement of students' engagement with peer feedback in similar contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   The impact of second language proficiency in dyadic peer feedback [J].
Allen, David ;
Mills, Amy .
LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2016, 20 (04) :498-513
[2]   Relative second language proficiency and the giving and receiving of written peer feedback [J].
Allen, David ;
Katayama, Akiko .
SYSTEM, 2016, 56 :96-106
[3]  
Bai L., 2013, Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, P51
[4]  
Cai J., 2011, Foreign Language World, V143, P65
[5]  
Carson J.G., 1996, Jounal of Second Language Writing, V5, P1, DOI [10.1016/S1060-3743, 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90012-0, DOI 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90012-0]
[6]   A comparison of peer, teacher and self-feedback on the reduction of language errors in student essays [J].
Diab, Nuwar Mawlawi .
SYSTEM, 2016, 57 :55-65
[7]   What are learners actually regulating when given feedback? [J].
Draper, Stephen W. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 40 (02) :306-315
[8]  
Ellis PD, 2010, ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO EFFECT SIZES: STATISTICAL POWER, META-ANALYSIS AND THE INTERPRETATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS, P1
[9]   A Framework for Investigating Oral and Written Corrective Feedback EPILOGUE [J].
Ellis, Rod .
STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2010, 32 (02) :335-349
[10]   Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing [J].
Fan, Yumei ;
Xu, Jinfen .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2020, 50