Journeying Through Journals: The Publishing Process and How to Maximise Research Impact

被引:1
作者
Madden, Judith C. [1 ]
Kandarova, Helena [2 ,3 ]
Neuhaus, Winfried [4 ,5 ]
Osborne, Nikki [6 ]
Paini, Alicia [7 ,8 ]
Seabra, Rita [9 ]
Trigwell, Susan [9 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Sch Pharm & Biomol Sci, Byrom St, Liverpool L3 3AF, England
[2] Slovak Acad Sci, Ctr Expt Med, Bratislava, Slovakia
[3] Slovak Univ Technol Bratislava, Inst Biochem & Microbiol, Fac Chem & Food Technol, Bratislava, Slovakia
[4] AIT Austrian Inst Technol GmbH, Ctr Hlth & Bioresources, Competence Unit Mol Diagnost, Vienna, Austria
[5] Danube Private Univ, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Med, Krems An Der Donnau, Austria
[6] Responsible Res Practice, Horsham, England
[7] esqLABS GmbH, Saterland, Germany
[8] European Food Safety Author, Parma, Italy
[9] FRAME, Nottingham, England
来源
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS | 2024年 / 52卷 / 06期
关键词
3Rs; AI; Artificial Intelligence; impact; peer review; publishing; Three Rs;
D O I
10.1177/02611929241286624
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Publication is essential to share new ideas, knowledge, or recent findings with those who have an interest in a particular area. Selecting the most appropriate format and timing for dissemination is critical to ensuring the long-term impact of research. However, many researchers, particularly those in the early stages of their career, are unaware of how the publication process works and the different options available for promoting research to maximum effect. Understanding how to maximise impact is particularly important for research using animal models or alternative methods, to make the best use of any animal data generated and reduce animal testing in future. Herein, different publishing models are explained, including anonymised peer review, open review and data sharing initiatives. An overview is given of key resources available to assist authors, reviewers and editors in the process of writing, presenting, reviewing and publishing research. New challenges and opportunities in publishing are discussed, including the potential influence of Artificial Intelligence. A list of 'ten top tips' in publishing for early career researchers is presented, providing advice and recommendations for ensuring a successful and impactful publication record.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 351
页数:18
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers' time spent on peer review [J].
Aczel, Balazs ;
Szaszi, Barnabas ;
Holcombe, Alex O. .
RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW, 2021, 6 (01)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, eLife Latest: What we have learned about preprints
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Altern Lab Anim, V48, P140
[4]  
[Anonymous], M i d d l e t o n, N. (2 0 0 5). P h o t o g r a p h y T h e U n c a n n y. R e t i r a d o d e h t t p: / / w w w. n i c h o l a s m i d d l e t o n. c o. u k / t h e s i s / t h e s i s 1. h t m l
[5]   It's Time to Review the Three Rs, to Make them More Fit for Purpose in the 21st Century [J].
Bailey, Jarrod .
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2024, 52 (03) :155-165
[6]   It's Time to Include Harm to Humans in Harm-Benefit Analysis - But How to Do It, That is the Question [J].
Balls, Michael .
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2021, 49 (05) :182-196
[7]   Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing [J].
Besancon, Lonni ;
Ronnberg, Niklas ;
Lowgren, Jonas ;
Tennant, Jonathan P. ;
Cooper, Matthew .
RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW, 2020, 5 (01)
[8]   The Use of Human Tissues for Research: What Investigators Need to Know [J].
Bledsoe, Marianna J. ;
Grizzle, William E. .
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2022, 50 (04) :265-274
[9]  
du Sert NP, 2020, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V40, P1769, DOI [10.1186/s12917-020-02451-y, 10.1177/0271678X20943823, 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410]
[10]  
ECHA European Chemicals Agency, 2016, P SCI WORKSH HELS 19