Friend or foe? Attitudes of rice farmers toward wild animals in West Africa

被引:2
作者
Chaves, Patricia [1 ,2 ]
Schaafsma, Marije [3 ]
Dabo, Djunco [4 ]
Lomba, Judite Z. [4 ]
Mane, Fode [4 ]
de Lim, Ricardo F. [1 ,2 ]
Palmeirim, Jorge M. [1 ,2 ]
Rocha, Ricardo [5 ]
Seck, Sambu [4 ]
Biai, Justino [6 ]
Timoteo, Sergio [7 ]
Meyer, Christoph F. J. [8 ]
Rainho, Ana [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Fac Ciencias, Ctr Ecol Evolut & Environm Changes, CHANGE Global Change & Sustainabil Inst, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Fac Ciencias, Dept Biol Anim, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Ctr Campones Djalicunda, Federacao KAFO, Bissau, Guinea Bissau
[5] Univ Oxford, Dept Biol, Oxford, England
[6] Inst Biodiversidade & Areas Protegidas, Bissau, Guinea Bissau
[7] Univ Coimbra, Ctr Funct Ecol, Dept Life Sci, Associate Lab TERRA, Coimbra, Portugal
[8] Univ Salford, Sch Sci Engn & Environm, Salford, England
关键词
agroecosystems; coexistence; crop damage; Guinea-Bissau; human-wildlife interactions; NATIONAL-PARK; CROP-DAMAGE; LOCAL PERCEPTIONS; PROTECTED AREA; CONFLICT; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; PEOPLE; AGROECOSYSTEM; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.5751/ES-15486-290424
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
. As the global human population grows and the demand for space and resources increases, human-wildlife interactions and conflicts are expected to rise, particularly in biodiversity-rich tropical agroecosystems where subsistence farmers and wildlife coexist. We investigated farmers' attitudes using the ABC framework, analyzing their affect, behavior, and cognition toward wild animals. Additionally, we explored how socio-demographic characteristics influence farmers' attitudes. Through individual interviews and focus groups, we assessed the responses of farmers from six villages in the Oio region of Guinea-Bissau, West Africa. Most farmers (56%) expressed positive emotions toward rice production, which is solely for subsistence, despite facing challenges such as animal pests (87%) and inadequate tools (78%). Farmers showed strong knowledge of local wildlife at the class level. However, even when 'bird' and 'bat' were accepted as correct, identification accuracy at lower taxonomic levels varied between 67.5% and 80.4% across different villages. Farmers have mixed emotions about wild animals, with a general tendency toward negative feelings due to crop damage (49%) and human harm (20%), while positive feelings are tied to cultural beliefs (51%), harmlessness (7%), proximity to water (4%), and edibility (4%). Although attitudes toward animals varied between villages, respondent age and education did not seem to affect these views. Wildlife crop protection behaviors were consistent across villages but varied by target animal. Most strategies were non-lethal, such as making noise (44%) or guarding fields (12%), but a common perception of their ineffectiveness may explain resistance to promoting beneficial animals in their fields. When asked about having beneficial animals in their fields, 89% of farmers either did not know or chose not to answer. These findings highlight the complex relationship between smallholder rice farmers and wildlife in developing regions. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for fostering coexistence and promoting both biodiversity and sustainable agriculture.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 106 条
[61]   Elephants in the garden: Financial and social costs of crop raiding [J].
Mackenzie, Catrina A. ;
Ahabyona, Peter .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 75 :72-82
[62]  
Madden Francine, 2004, Human Dimensions of Wildlife, V9, P247, DOI 10.1080/10871200490505675
[63]  
Manfredo M., 2008, Who cares about wildlife? Social Science concepts for exploring human-wildlife relationships and conservation issues, P75, DOI [10.1007/978-0-387-77040-6_4, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-77040-6_4, 10.1007/978-0-387-77040-64]
[64]  
Manfredo M.J., 2004, Hum. Dimens. Wildlife, V9, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1080/10871200490505765, 10.1080/10871200490505765]
[65]  
Manoa D. O., 2020, Journal of Biodiversity Management and Forestry, V9, P2, DOI [10.37532/jbmf.2020.9(1).228, DOI 10.37532/JBMF.2020.9(1).228]
[66]   An assessment of human-wildlife conflicts in local communities bordering the western part of Save Valley Conservancy, Zimbabwe [J].
Matseketsa, Given ;
Muboko, Never ;
Gandiwa, Edson ;
Kombora, Davidson M. ;
Chibememe, Gladman .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2019, 20
[68]   Livestock depredation by large carnivores in the Indian trans-Himalaya: conflict perceptions and conservation prospects [J].
Mishra, C .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1997, 24 (04) :338-343
[69]  
Mojo D, 2014, HUM-WILDL INTERACT, V8, P67
[70]   An overview of global rice production, supply, trade, and consumption [J].
Muthayya, Sumithra ;
Sugimoto, Jonathan D. ;
Montgomery, Scott ;
Maberly, Glen F. .
TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR RICE FORTIFICATION IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 1324 :7-14