Environmental Assessment of Hybrid Waste-to-Energy System in Ghana

被引:0
作者
Armoo, Ekua Afrakoma [1 ,2 ]
Baidoo, Theophilus [3 ]
Mohammed, Mutala [2 ]
Agyenim, Francis Boateng [2 ]
Kemausuor, Francis [4 ]
Narra, Satyanarayana [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rostock, Dept Waste & Resource Management, D-18051 Rostock, Germany
[2] Council Sci, Ind Res Inst Ind Res, POB LG 576, Accra, Ghana
[3] Zeal Environm Technol, POB TD 1395, Takoradi, Ghana
[4] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol KNUST, Dept Agr & Biosyst Engn, Kumasi 0395028, Ghana
[5] German Biomass Res Ctr gGmbH, D-04347 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
life cycle analysis; waste to energy; anaerobic digestion; pyrolysis; refuse derived fuels; environmental impacts; global warming potential; openLCA; LandGEM; Ghana; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ELECTRICITY; TECHNOLOGIES; BIOGAS;
D O I
10.3390/en18030595
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Waste management in most parts of Africa is characterized by the disposal of mixed waste in unengineered landfills. The aim of this study is to assess the environmental impact of mixed waste received at a waste-to-energy plant in Ghana relative to the current model of landfilling. A Life Cycle Assessment was conducted using OpenLCA software version 2.3.1 based on the ReCiPe Midpoint method. For landfilling, LandGEM software version 3.03 was used. The results indicate that waste-to-energy has the potential to provide carbon savings of 3.52 tCO2eq/ton of waste treated compared to landfilling. Pyrolysis is observed to have high avoided burden across all impact categories, with the lowest Global Warming Potential of -2.3 kgCO2eq. Anaerobic digestion shows a near neutral environmental impact with the highest value of 47.56 kg 1,4DCB for Terrestrial Ecotoxicity, while Refuse-Derived Fuel and segregation processes show low environmental burdens. The net avoided burden is highest for global warming and non-carcinogenic human toxicity potential. Overall, the hybrid waste-to-energy model is concluded to be an environmentally preferred waste management option compared to conventional landfilling methods, and we recommend that decision-makers facilitate investments into it. It is also recommended for the development of local inventories and databases to encourage more country-specific environmental impact studies and to reduce uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development of a waste-to-energy gasification system for sustainable communities
    Gungor, Bogachan
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 46 (14) : 20704 - 20717
  • [32] Waste-to-Energy technologies for municipal solid waste management: Bibliometric review, life cycle assessment, and energy potential case study
    Chicaiza-Ortiz, Cristhian
    Penafiel-Arcos, Pedro
    Herrera-Feijoo, Robinson J.
    Ma, Wenchao
    Logrono, Washington
    Tian, Hailin
    Yuan, Wang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 480
  • [33] Assessment of energy recovery potential and analysis of environmental impacts of waste to energy options using life cycle assessment
    Kumar, Atul
    Samadder, Sukha Ranjan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 365
  • [34] An analysis of the economic viability of waste-to-energy generation in the Kumasi metropolis of Ghana
    Owusu-Manu, De-Graft
    Amo-Asamoah, E.
    Ghansah, Frank Ato
    Asumadu, George
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF PROPERTY AND CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 27 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [35] Hybrid renewable energy systems involving thermochemical conversion process for waste-to-energy strategy
    Lee, Jechan
    Lin, Kun-Yi Andrew
    Jung, Sungyup
    Kwon, Eilhann E.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2023, 452
  • [36] Waste-to-energy status in Serbia
    Bajic, Bojana Z.
    Dodic, Sinisa N.
    Vucurovic, Damjan G.
    Dodic, Jelena M.
    Grahovac, Jovana A.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 50 : 1437 - 1444
  • [37] Thermal and environmental analysis of an infectious medical waste-to-energy
    Suvarnabol, Chanansith
    Chaiyat, Nattaporn
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY FOR CLIMATE ACTION, 2024, 4
  • [38] A life cycle assessment of environmental performances of two combustion- and gasification-based waste-to-energy technologies
    Arena, Umberto
    Ardolino, Filomena
    Di Gregorio, Fabrizio
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 41 : 60 - 74
  • [39] Waste-to-energy innovative system: Assessment of integrating anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis technologies
    Caiardi, Fanny
    Belaud, Jean-Pierre
    Vialle, Claire
    Monlau, Florian
    Tayibi, Saida
    Barakat, Abdellatif
    Oukarroum, Abdallah
    Zeroual, Youssef
    Sablayrolles, Caroline
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 31 : 657 - 669
  • [40] Life cycle assessment modelling of waste-to-energy incineration in Spain and Portugal
    Margallo, M.
    Aldaco, R.
    Irabien, A.
    Carrillo, V.
    Fischer, M.
    Bala, A.
    Fullana, P.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2014, 32 (06) : 492 - 499