Online Family Training After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Parallel Randomized Control Trial

被引:0
作者
Karns, Christina M. [1 ]
Powell, Laurie [1 ]
Durany, Karen A. [2 ]
Slocumb, Jody [1 ]
Beck, Laura [1 ]
Gau, Jeff [2 ]
Glang, Ann [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Ctr Brain Injury Res & Training, Dept Psychol, 1244 Walnut St,Suite 220, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Coll Educ, Eugene, OR USA
关键词
family; caregiver; traumatic brain injury; training; eHealth; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FACE PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; SPINAL-CORD-INJURY; EXECUTIVE DYSFUNCTION; INTERVENTION IMPACT; CAREGIVER BURDEN; CHILDREN; HEALTH; INDIVIDUALS; PARENT;
D O I
10.1037/rep0000605
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate an online intervention to support family members of individuals who sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Research Design: Randomized control trial. Parallel assignment to TBI Family Support (TBIFS) intervention or enhanced usual care control (TAU). Three testing timepoints: pretest baseline (T1), posttest within 2 weeks of assignment (T2), and follow-up 1 month after posttest (T3). Setting: Online. Participants: Sixty-eight caregivers recruited nationally: 18 years of age or older, English speaking, providing primary caregiving to an adult family member with TBI and mild to moderate disability. Intervention: Eight interactive modules providing information about cognitive, behavioral, and social consequences of TBI, training in problem-solving framework, and application exercises (N = 35). TAU was an informational website (N = 33). Measures: Proximal outcomes-program use, usability, and user satisfaction for TBIFS participants. Primary outcomes-TBI content knowledge, strategy application objective response and open-ended response, and strategy-application confidence. Secondary outcomes-appraisals of burden, satisfaction, uncertainty in mastery, guilt, and negative environment. Results: Proximal outcomes-about 80% of TBIFS participants completed the posttest assessment, and 91% reported moderate to high usability and user satisfaction. Primary outcomes-greater posttest gains in TBI content knowledge for TBIFS than TAU (t = 3.53, p = .0005, adjusted p = .0090, d = 0.91). Gains maintained through follow-up (t = 2.89, p = .0038, adjusted p = .0342, d = 0.90). No other effects for the primary or secondary outcomes. Conclusion: TBIFS improved TBI content knowledge relative to TAU. Modifications might be needed to improve application and distal outcomes for caregivers.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 98 条
  • [1] Coping and adaptive strategies of traumatic brain injury survivors and primary caregivers
    Adams, Deana
    Dahdah, Marie
    [J]. NEUROREHABILITATION, 2016, 39 (02) : 223 - 237
  • [2] A predictive model of resilience among family caregivers supporting relatives with traumatic brain injury (TBI): A structural equation modelling approach
    Anderson, Malcolm, I
    Daher, Maysaa
    Simpson, Grahame K.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2020, 30 (10) : 1925 - 1946
  • [3] The relationship between neurobehavioural problems of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), family functioning and the psychological wellbeing of the spouse/caregiver: path model analysis
    Anderson, MI
    Parmenter, TR
    Mok, M
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2002, 16 (09) : 743 - 757
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, SASSTAT 93 USERS GUI
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2023, Traumatic brain injury and concussion
  • [6] Antonini TN, 2014, BEHAV THER, V45, P455, DOI 10.1016/j.beth.2014.02.003
  • [7] Family roles, challenges and needs in caring for traumatic brain injury (TBI) family members: a systematic review
    Azman, Azlinda
    Jali, Nor Amalina
    Singh, Paramjit Singh Jamir
    Abdullah, Jafri Malin
    Ibrahim, Haidi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH RESEARCH, 2020, 34 (06) : 495 - 504
  • [8] Caregiver outcomes and interventions: a systematic scoping review of the traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury literature
    Baker, Anne
    Barker, Samantha
    Sampson, Amanda
    Martin, Clarissa
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 31 (01) : 45 - 60
  • [9] Bangor A, 2009, J USABILITY STUD, V4, P114
  • [10] Barnett ML, 2021, COGN BEHAV PRACT, V28, P630, DOI 10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.03.005