Implant infection after prepectoral breast reconstruction treated with negative pressure wound therapy and photobiomodulation: a case report

被引:0
|
作者
Di Micco, Rosa [1 ]
Santurro, Letizia [1 ,2 ]
Zuber, Veronica [1 ]
Gasparri, Maria Luisa [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Cisternino, Giovanni [1 ]
Ludovica, Pitoni [1 ]
Ceccarino, Raffaele [1 ]
Rottino, Stefano Antonio [1 ]
Forma, Ornella [5 ]
Gentilini, Oreste D. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Breast Surg Unit, Milan, Italy
[2] Human Gavazzeni, Breast Surg, Via Mauro Gavazzeni Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
[3] Ctr Senol Svizzera Italiana, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
[4] Univ Italian Switzerland, Fac Biomed, Lugano, Switzerland
[5] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Wound Care Unit, Milan, Italy
[6] San Raffaele Vita Salute Univ, Milan, Italy
关键词
breast implant; ductal breast carcinoma; infection; mastectomy; negative pressure wound therapy; photobiomodulation; prepectoral breast reconstruction; wound; wound care; wound dressing; wound healing; VACUUM-ASSISTED CLOSURE; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY; SALVAGE; BIOMODULATION; METAANALYSIS; EFFICACY; DEVICE; REPAIR;
D O I
10.12968/jowc.2022.0097
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Prepectoral breast reconstruction is a relatively new surgical technique that allows placement of the implant directly over the pectoralis major. It has benefits in terms of patient wellbeing, operative time, postoperative pain and recovery. However, in cases of infection, implant removal is often required and the patient is left with a flat chest. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case of breast implant infection after breast reconstruction, successfully treated with a combination of both negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and photobiomodulation (PBM). A 32-year-old female patient with a sparing mastectomy for in situ ductal breast carcinoma followed by a prepectoral reconstruction. On the left side, the patient presented with dehiscence of 2.5cm with implant exposure 90 days after surgery. After an initial conservative approach, the patient's condition worsened, and she developed a larger dehiscence and a red breast. She was treated with implant removal. PBM of the cavity and the application of VeraFlo Therapy (3M, US) with a polyurethane-foam filling in the residual cavity were adopted. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated and appropriate antibiotic therapy was started. Every 48-72 hours, she returned to the operating room for a washout, PBM, 21 days of this approach and two consecutive negative swabs, the patient underwent breast reconstruction with a subpectoral expander. After six months, a definitive implant of the same size as the contralateral one was positioned. The cosmetic result was good and patient satisfaction was high. The combination of NPWT and PBM may represent a good solution in case of breast implant infection after prepectoral reconstruction with benefits in terms of surgical outcome, patient satisfaction and postoperative quality of life. Declaration of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 186
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Application of negative pressure wound therapy in patients with wound dehiscence after abdominal open surgery: a single center experience
    Jong, Ji Young
    Shim, Hongjin
    Lee, Yun Jin
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    Lee, Jae Gil
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 85 (04): : 180 - 184
  • [42] Oncoplastic breast surgery: the role of negative pressure wound therapy
    Iqbal, Fahad M.
    Reid, Jeremy P.
    Vidya, Raghavan
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2020, 29 (12) : 777 - 780
  • [43] Ending surgical site infection by negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT): A case report
    Arad, Mansour
    Goli, Rasoul
    Ebrahimzade, Mazhar
    Lorzini, Mohammad
    Abdali, Mahnaz
    Sepehrnia, Nazila
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, 2022, 94
  • [44] Is Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy a "Bridge to Reconstruction" for Poststernotomy Mediastinitis? A Systematic Review
    White, Brad M.
    Meyer, Dustin L.
    Harlin, Stephen L.
    ADVANCES IN SKIN & WOUND CARE, 2019, 32 (11) : 502 - 506
  • [45] Evaluation of the combination of a biofilm-disrupting agent and negative pressure wound therapy: a case series
    Serena, Thomas E.
    Jalodi, Omar
    Serena, Laura
    Patel, Keyur
    Mynti, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2021, 30 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [46] Semiclosure wound therapy plus negative pressure wound therapy for an older patient with grade 4 diabetic foot with concomitant vascular occlusion A case report
    Yan, Yafeng
    Li, Wenfeng
    Song, Yan
    Yin, Pei
    He, Zongze
    Gong, Yanping
    Peng, Lili
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (44) : e17786
  • [47] Mesh Infection After Hernia Repair and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. A Systematic Review
    Bueno-Lledo, Jose
    Martinez-Hoed, Jesus
    Bonafe-Diana, Santiago
    Pous-Serrano, Salvador
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 47 (06) : 1495 - 1502
  • [48] Patient-reported outcome and cost implication of acute salvage of infected implant-based breast reconstruction with negative pressure wound therapy with Instillation (NPWTi) compared to standard care
    Haque, Shameem
    Kanapathy, Muholan
    Bollen, Edward
    Mosahebi, Afshin
    Younis, Ibby
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2021, 74 (12) : 3300 - 3306
  • [49] Application of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Patients with Wound Complications after Flap Repair for Vulvar Cancer: A Retrospective Study
    Qiu, Liangzhi
    Wu, Xianrong
    Wang, Xiu
    ADVANCES IN SKIN & WOUND CARE, 2025, 38 (03) : 142 - 147
  • [50] Role of negative pressure wound therapy in the prevention of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery
    Ocana Jimenez, Juan
    Abadia Barno, Pedro
    Ramos Rubio, Diego
    Pina Hernandez, Juan Diego
    Garcia Perez, Juan Carlos
    Moreno Montes, Irene
    Rodriguez Velasco, Gloria
    Tobaruela de Blas, Estela
    Die Trill, Javier
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2019, 97 (05): : 268 - 274