Implant infection after prepectoral breast reconstruction treated with negative pressure wound therapy and photobiomodulation: a case report

被引:0
作者
Di Micco, Rosa [1 ]
Santurro, Letizia [1 ,2 ]
Zuber, Veronica [1 ]
Gasparri, Maria Luisa [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Cisternino, Giovanni [1 ]
Ludovica, Pitoni [1 ]
Ceccarino, Raffaele [1 ]
Rottino, Stefano Antonio [1 ]
Forma, Ornella [5 ]
Gentilini, Oreste D. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Breast Surg Unit, Milan, Italy
[2] Human Gavazzeni, Breast Surg, Via Mauro Gavazzeni Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
[3] Ctr Senol Svizzera Italiana, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
[4] Univ Italian Switzerland, Fac Biomed, Lugano, Switzerland
[5] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Wound Care Unit, Milan, Italy
[6] San Raffaele Vita Salute Univ, Milan, Italy
关键词
breast implant; ductal breast carcinoma; infection; mastectomy; negative pressure wound therapy; photobiomodulation; prepectoral breast reconstruction; wound; wound care; wound dressing; wound healing; VACUUM-ASSISTED CLOSURE; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY; SALVAGE; BIOMODULATION; METAANALYSIS; EFFICACY; DEVICE; REPAIR;
D O I
10.12968/jowc.2022.0097
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Prepectoral breast reconstruction is a relatively new surgical technique that allows placement of the implant directly over the pectoralis major. It has benefits in terms of patient wellbeing, operative time, postoperative pain and recovery. However, in cases of infection, implant removal is often required and the patient is left with a flat chest. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case of breast implant infection after breast reconstruction, successfully treated with a combination of both negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and photobiomodulation (PBM). A 32-year-old female patient with a sparing mastectomy for in situ ductal breast carcinoma followed by a prepectoral reconstruction. On the left side, the patient presented with dehiscence of 2.5cm with implant exposure 90 days after surgery. After an initial conservative approach, the patient's condition worsened, and she developed a larger dehiscence and a red breast. She was treated with implant removal. PBM of the cavity and the application of VeraFlo Therapy (3M, US) with a polyurethane-foam filling in the residual cavity were adopted. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated and appropriate antibiotic therapy was started. Every 48-72 hours, she returned to the operating room for a washout, PBM, 21 days of this approach and two consecutive negative swabs, the patient underwent breast reconstruction with a subpectoral expander. After six months, a definitive implant of the same size as the contralateral one was positioned. The cosmetic result was good and patient satisfaction was high. The combination of NPWT and PBM may represent a good solution in case of breast implant infection after prepectoral reconstruction with benefits in terms of surgical outcome, patient satisfaction and postoperative quality of life. Declaration of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 186
页数:7
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]   Innovative Management of Implant Exposure in ADM/Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy [J].
Accurso, Antonello ;
Rocco, Nicola ;
Accardo, Giuseppe ;
Reale, Paola ;
Salerno, Carmela ;
Mattera, Edi ;
D'Andrea, Francesco .
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2017, 41 (01) :36-39
[3]   Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: Two-year results of the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study [J].
Alderman, AK ;
Wilkins, EG ;
Kim, HM ;
Lowery, JC .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 109 (07) :2265-2274
[4]   Low-Level Light/Laser Therapy Versus Photobiomodulation Therapy [J].
Anders, Juanita J. ;
Lanzafame, Raymond J. ;
Arany, Praveen R. .
PHOTOMEDICINE AND LASER SURGERY, 2015, 33 (04) :183-184
[5]  
Avci P, 2013, SEMIN CUTAN MED SURG, V32, P41
[6]   Defining Infection in Breast Reconstruction A Literature Review [J].
Azouz, Vitali ;
Mirhaidari, Shayda ;
Wagner, Douglas S. .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 80 (05) :587-591
[7]   A retrospective comparative analysis of risk factors and outcomes in direct-to-implant and two-stages prepectoral breast reconstruction: BMI and radiotherapy as new selection criteria of patients [J].
Casella, D. ;
Di Taranto, G. ;
Onesti, Mg ;
Greco, M. ;
Ribuffo, D. .
EJSO, 2019, 45 (08) :1357-1363
[8]   "To Pre or Not to Pre": Introduction of a Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Assessment Score to Help Surgeons Solving the Decision-Making Dilemma. Retrospective Results of a Multicenter Experience [J].
Casella, Donato ;
Kaciulyte, Juste ;
Lo Torto, Federico ;
Mori, Francesco L. R. ;
Barellini, Leonardo ;
Fausto, Alfonso ;
Fanelli, Benedetta ;
Greco, Manfredi ;
Ribuffo, Diego ;
Marcasciano, Marco .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (06) :1278-1286
[9]   A New Method of Salvaging Breast Reconstruction After Breast Implant Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Instillation [J].
Cheong, Ju Yong ;
Goltsman, David ;
Warrier, Sanjay .
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 40 (05) :745-748
[10]   Protocol for the prevention and management of complications related to ADM implant-based breast reconstructions [J].
Citron, Isabelle ;
Dower, Rory ;
Ho-Asjoe, Mark .
GMS INTERDISCIPLINARY PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY DGPW, 2016, 5