Diagnostic performance of NIRADS on F-18 FDG PET/CT in the post-treatment assessment of head and neck malignancies - a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Datta, Deepanksha [1 ]
Selvakumar, B. [2 ]
Goel, Akhil Dhanesh [3 ]
Chhibber, Sanskriti [4 ]
Gupta, Tejpal [5 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Nucl Med, Jodhpur, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, Basni Ind Area Phase 2, Jodhpur 342005, Rajasthan, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Community & Family Med, Jodhpur, India
[4] Bharathiar Univ, Human Genet, Coimbatore, India
[5] Tata Mem Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Mumbai, India
关键词
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; Post-treatment assessment; NIRADS; F-18 FDG PET/CT scan; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; PUBLICATION BIAS; TEST ACCURACY; CERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-025-07230-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose This review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NIRADS) categories using 2-deoxy 2-(Fluorine-18) fluoro D-glucose positron emission tomography integrated with computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT) to diagnose recurrence or treatment failure in the post-treatment assessment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Methods A systematic search of the indexed medical literature was conducted till 7 November 2024 using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar to include studies reporting post-treatment recurrence rates on F-18-FDG PET/CT as per the NIRADS criteria. Studies were qualitatively assessed for risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. We categorized patients with 'NI-RADS <= 2' as low risk of recurrence and 'NI-RADS >= 3' as high risk of recurrence. Diagnostic performance of NI-RADS was evaluated through weighted-pooling of standard metrics of diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic Odd's ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve analysis. Results Out of 1632 records identified, 8 studies with 7 datasets were included, with over 1200 patients and over 1300 F-18 FDG PET/CT scans. All studies were retrospective, with presence of a risk for bias, publication bias and data heterogeneity. The time between treatment and F-18 FDG PET/CT assessment was 8-17 weeks. For combined sites (primary, nodal or distant sites), the ability of 'NIRADS >= 3' over 'NIRADS <= 2' to detect a recurrence was acceptable with a pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of 0.68 (95% Confidence Interval, CI 0.63-0.73), 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88-0.92), 6.01 (95% CI, 2.9- 12.6) and 0.47 (95% CI, 0.31- 0.71) respectively, with a DOR of 14.13 (95% CI, 9.78-20.42) and an area under the curve, AUC of 0.859 (Standard Error, SE -0.018) on SROC analysis Conclusion In F-18 FDG PET/CT done on post-treatment HNSCC patients, the diagnostic performance of NIRADS >= 3 categories over NIRADS <= 2 categories in detecting treatment failure or recurrence at combined primary, nodal or distant sites was acceptable, with a low certainty of evidence. The NIRADS categories, especially NIRADS >= 3 and NIRADS <= 2 categories should be routinely reported in post-treatment F-18 FDG PET/CT scans in HNSCC patients.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System
    Aiken, Ashley H.
    Hudgins, Patricia A.
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 26 (01) : 51 - +
  • [2] Implementation of a Novel Surveillance Template for Head and Neck Cancer: Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS)
    Aiken, Ashley H.
    Farley, April
    Baugnon, Kristen L.
    Corey, Amanda
    El-Deiry, Mark
    Duszak, Richard
    Beitler, Jonathan
    Hudgins, Patricia A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (06) : 743 - 746
  • [3] Performance of Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) for Diagnosis of Recurrence of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Baba, Akira
    Kurokawa, Ryo
    Kurokawa, Mariko
    Yanagisawa, Takafumi
    Srinivasan, Ashok
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2023, 44 (10) : 1184 - 1190
  • [4] Bhat Revanth R, 2025, Cureus, V17, pe78476, DOI 10.7759/cureus.78476
  • [5] MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies
    Brooke, Benjamin S.
    Schwartz, Todd A.
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2021, 156 (08) : 787 - 788
  • [6] Head and Neck Cancers, Version 1.2022 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines
    Caudell, Jimmy J.
    Gillison, Maura L.
    Maghami, Ellie
    Spencer, Sharon
    Pfister, David G.
    Adkins, Douglas
    Birkeland, Andrew C.
    Brizel, David M.
    Busse, Paul M.
    Cmelak, Anthony J.
    Colevas, A. Dimitrios
    Eisele, David W.
    Galloway, Thomas
    Geiger, Jessica L.
    Haddad, Robert, I
    Hicks, Wesley L.
    Hitchcock, Ying J.
    Jimeno, Antonio
    Leizman, Debra
    Mell, Loren K.
    Mittal, Bharat B.
    Pinto, Harlan A.
    Rocco, James W.
    Rodriguez, Cristina P.
    Savvides, Panayiotis S.
    Schwartz, David
    Shah, Jatin P.
    Sher, David
    St John, Maie
    Weber, Randal S.
    Weinstein, Gregory
    Worden, Frank
    Bruce, Justine Yang
    Yom, Sue S.
    Zhen, Weining
    Burns, Jennifer L.
    Darlow, Susan D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2022, 20 (03): : 224 - 234
  • [7] Detecting Residual/Recurrent Head Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas Using PET or PET/CT: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Cheung, Phylannie K. F.
    Chin, Ronald Y.
    Eslick, Guy D.
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2016, 154 (03) : 421 - 432
  • [8] Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws-a current overview-part 2: Dental management and therapeutic options for treatment
    Chrcanovic B.R.
    Reher P.
    Sousa A.A.
    Harris M.
    [J]. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2010, 14 (2) : 81 - 95
  • [9] The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed
    Deeks, JJ
    Macaskill, P
    Irwig, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (09) : 882 - 893
  • [10] Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: Didactic guidelines
    Devillé W.L.
    Buntinx F.
    Bouter L.M.
    Montori V.M.
    De Vet H.C.W.
    Van Der Windt D.A.W.M.
    Bezemer P.D.
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2 (1) : 1 - 13