Enhanced biogas production from water hyacinth and cow dung with wood and faecal sludge biochar

被引:0
作者
Kulabako, Robinah N. [1 ]
Semiyaga, Swaib [1 ]
Tumwesige, Rodney S. [1 ]
Irumba, Collin [1 ]
Opio, Miria I. [2 ]
Manga, Musa [3 ]
Tumwesige, Vianney [4 ]
Quintana-Najera, Jessica [5 ]
Ross, Andrew B. [6 ]
机构
[1] Makerere Univ, Coll Engn Design Art & Technol, Sch Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, POB 7062, Kampala, Uganda
[2] Makerere Univ, Ctr Renewable Energy & Energy Conservat, Kampala, Uganda
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, 166 Rosenau Hall,135 Dauer Dr,Campus Box 7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] Green Heat U Ltd, POB 10235, Kampala, Uganda
[5] Autonomous Univ Sinaloa, Fac Chem & Biol Sci, Culiacan 80010, Mexico
[6] Univ Leeds, Sch Civil Engn, Leeds LS2 9JT, England
来源
ENERGY NEXUS | 2025年 / 17卷
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Biogas; Faecal sludge biochar; Water hyacinth; Wood biochar; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.nexus.2024.100342
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Water hyacinth (WH), known for its ecotoxicity and economic burden in tropical regions, can play an important role as a lignocellulosic biomass source for biogas production. Co-digesting WH with cow dung (CD) enhances biogas yield but poses challenges like process instability and excessive carbon dioxide production. To improve biogas yield from digestion of WH and CD, this study examined the impact of wood and faecal sludge biochar on the anaerobic co-digestion of CD and WH using a temperature of 37 degrees C for 40 days. In the controlled laboratory tests, cow dung alone produced the least methane (CH4), but introducing 2 % wood and faecal sludge biochars significantly boosted CH4 production by 76.8 % and 94.0 %, respectively. However, a 50 % CD-50 % WH mixture, the CH4 increase was milder at 20 % and 37 %, respectively. Wood biochar had no significant effect while faecal sludge biochar made a statistically significant impact (P < 0.05). These findings offer a sustainable solution, paving the way for cost-effective and eco-friendly biogas production in regions plagued by this invasive plant. The use of faecal sludge biochar, in particular, has substantial implications for optimizing anaerobic digestion processes and reducing their environmental footprint, thereby promoting a more sustainable approach to managing WH and addressing energy needs in tropical, eutrophic regions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [11] Review of biochar role as additive in anaerobic digestion processes
    Chiappero, Marco
    Norouzi, Omid
    Hu, Mingyu
    Demichelis, Francesca
    Berruti, Franco
    Di Maria, Francesco
    Masek, Ondrej
    Fiore, Silvia
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 131
  • [12] Dechassa N., 2020, J Environ Earth Sci, V10, P13, DOI [DOI 10.7176/JEES/10-10-02, 10.7176/jees/10-10-02]
  • [13] Dolle K., 2020, J. Ener. Res. Rev, V5, P49, DOI [10.9734/jenrr/2020/v5i330149, DOI 10.9734/JENRR/2020/V5I330149]
  • [14] Anaerobic Fermentative Co-production of Hydrogen and Methane from an Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste
    Dong, L.
    Zhenhong, Y.
    Yongming, S.
    Longlong, M.
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2011, 33 (06) : 575 - 585
  • [15] Water hyacinth control in Lake Victoria: Transforming an ecological catastrophe into economic, social, and environmental benefits
    Guerena, David
    Neufeldt, Henry
    Berazneva, Julia
    Duby, Sam
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2015, 3 : 59 - 69
  • [16] Towards a standardization of biomethane potential tests
    Holliger, Christof
    Alves, Madalena
    Andrade, Diana
    Angelidaki, Irini
    Astals, Sergi
    Baier, Urs
    Bougrier, Claire
    Buffiere, Pierre
    Carballa, Marta
    de Wilde, Vinnie
    Ebertseder, Florian
    Fernandez, Belen
    Ficara, Elena
    Fotidis, Ioannis
    Frigon, Jean-Claude
    de Laclos, Helene Fruteau
    Ghasimi, Dara S. M.
    Hack, Gabrielle
    Hartel, Mathias
    Heerenklage, Joern
    Horvath, Ilona Sarvari
    Jenicek, Pavel
    Koch, Konrad
    Krautwald, Judith
    Lizasoain, Javier
    Liu, Jing
    Mosberger, Lona
    Nistor, Mihaela
    Oechsner, Hans
    Oliveira, Joao Vitor
    Paterson, Mark
    Pauss, Andre
    Pommier, Sebastien
    Porqueddu, Isabella
    Raposo, Francisco
    Ribeiro, Thierry
    Pfund, Florian Rusch
    Stromberg, Sten
    Torrijos, Michel
    van Eekert, Miriam
    van Lier, Jules
    Wedwitschka, Harald
    Wierinck, Isabella
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 74 (11) : 2515 - 2522
  • [17] Methodological Approaches to Optimising Anaerobic Digestion of Water Hyacinth for Energy Efficiency in South Africa
    Ilo, Obianuju Patience
    Simatele, Mulala Danny
    Nkomo, S'phumelele Lucky
    Mkhize, Ntandoyenkosi Malusi
    Prabhu, Nagendra Gopinath
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [18] Effects of biochar parent material and microbial pre-loading in biochar-amended high-solids anaerobic digestion
    Indren, Mathu
    Birzer, Cristian H.
    Kidd, Stephen P.
    Hall, Tony
    Medwell, Paul R.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 298
  • [19] Anaerobic co-digestion: Current status and perspectives
    Karki, Renisha
    Chuenchart, Wachiranon
    Surendra, K. C.
    Shrestha, Shilva
    Raskin, Lutgarde
    Sung, Shihwu
    Hashimoto, Andrew
    Khanal, Samir Kumar
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 330
  • [20] Biogas and its opportunities-A review
    Kougias, Panagiotis G.
    Angelidaki, Irini
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2018, 12 (03)