Short-term Safety of Robot-assisted Rectal Surgery in Patients Aged ≥75 Years: A Single-center Retrospective Study

被引:0
|
作者
Teraishi, Fuminori [1 ,2 ]
Yoshida, Yusuke [1 ]
Shoji, Ryohei [1 ]
Kanaya, Nobuhiko [1 ]
Matsumi, Yuki [1 ,2 ]
Shigeyasu, Kunitoshi [1 ]
Kondo, Yoshitaka [1 ]
Kagawa, Shunsuke [1 ]
Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Okayama Univ, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, 2-5-1 Shikata Cho,Kita Ku, Okayama 7008558, Japan
[2] Okayama Univ Hosp, Dept Minimally Invas Therapy Ctr, Okayama, Japan
关键词
Robot assisted surgery; older patients; rectal cancer; short - term outcome; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; OLDER;
D O I
10.21873/anticanres.17516
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background/Aim: The aging population challenges surgical management of rectal cancer. This study evaluated the short-term safety of robot-assisted rectal surgery (RARS) in patients aged 75 years and older, examining perioperative complications and surgical outcomes in this vulnerable population. Patients and Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at Okayama University Hospital from September 2020 to December 2024, including 109 patients undergoing RARS. Patients were divided into older (>= 75 years, n=19) and non-older (<75 years, n=90) groups. Surgical procedures utilized the da Vinci Xi system, with comprehensive assessment of perioperative characteristics and complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results: The older group demonstrated significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (89.5% >= 2 vs. 58.9% in non-older group, p=0.036). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the older group (8 vs. 18 cases, p=0.04), though severe complications were similar to those in the non-older group. Median postoperative hospital stay was longer in the older group (12 vs. 9 days, p=0.01), but this difference disappeared when excluding stoma cases. Critically, no postoperative mortality was observed within 30 days in either group. Conclusion: Robot-assisted rectal surgery appears safe for patients aged 75 years and older. While the older group experienced more complications, these were predominantly manageable. The findings suggest that careful patient selection and experienced surgical teams can successfully employ robotic techniques in older patients while maintaining oncological standards.
引用
收藏
页码:1291 / 1299
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic rectal surgery for rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis using the Japanese Nationwide diagnosis procedure combination database
    Mizoguchi, Masako
    Kizuki, Masashi
    Iwata, Noriko
    Tokunaga, Masanori
    Fushimi, Kiyohide
    Kinugasa, Yusuke
    Fujiwara, Takeo
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2023, 7 (06): : 955 - 967
  • [32] What affects the selection of diverting ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective study
    Wang, Zhen
    Guo, Yuchen
    Li, Shuang
    He, Liang
    Zhao, Yinquan
    Wang, Quan
    BMC SURGERY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [33] Usefulness of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: short-term outcomes: a single-center and retrospective analysis
    Shota Aoyama
    Yuji Inoue
    Takeshi Ohki
    Michio Itabashi
    Masakazu Yamamoto
    BMC Surgery, 19
  • [34] Short-term outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for deep infiltrative endometriosis with rectal involvement: a single-center experience of 168 cases
    de las Casas, Sara Gortazar
    Spagnolo, Emanuela
    Di Saverio, Salomone
    Alvarez-Gallego, Mario
    Carrasco, Ana Lopez
    Lopez, Maria Carbonell
    Cobos, Sergio Torres
    Campo, Constantino Fondevila
    Gutierrez, Alicia Hernandez
    Miguelanez, Isabel Pascual
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2023, 39 (03) : 216 - 222
  • [35] What affects the selection of diverting ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective study
    Zhen Wang
    Yuchen Guo
    Shuang Li
    Liang He
    Yinquan Zhao
    Quan Wang
    BMC Surgery, 24
  • [36] The "Micro Hand S" Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: Short-Term Outcomes at a Single Center
    Zeng, Yijia
    Wang, Guohui
    Liu, Yong
    Li, Zheng
    Yi, Bo
    Zhu, Shaihong
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 30 (04): : 363 - 368
  • [37] Short-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in robotic-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study
    Xu, Xia
    Xiong, Jiajun
    Xu, Zhijie
    Hu, Zhi
    Alai, Guha
    Yu, Lulu
    Xia, Shaofeng
    Lin, Yidan
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [38] Comparative Efficacy of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: A Single-Center Comparative Study
    Chen, Peng
    Zhou, Bin
    Wang, Tao
    Hu, Xiao
    Ye, Yongqiang
    Guo, Weidong
    JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [39] Identification of factors predictive of postoperative morbidity and short-term mortality in older patients after colorectal carcinoma resection: A single-center retrospective study
    Schreckenbach, Teresa
    Zeller, Matthias Valentin
    El Youzouri, Hanan
    Bechstein, Wolf Otto
    Woeste, Guido
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 9 (06) : 649 - 658
  • [40] Technical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal tumors: a single-center safety and feasibility study
    Jesse Y. Tajima
    Ryoma Yokoi
    Shigeru Kiyama
    Takao Takahashi
    Hirokata Hayashi
    Toshiya Higashi
    Masahiro Fukada
    Ryuichi Asai
    Yuta Sato
    Itaru Yasufuku
    Yoshihiro Tanaka
    Naoki Okumura
    Katsutoshi Murase
    Takuma Ishihara
    Nobuhisa Matsuhashi
    Surgery Today, 2024, 54 : 478 - 486