Short-term Safety of Robot-assisted Rectal Surgery in Patients Aged ≥75 Years: A Single-center Retrospective Study

被引:0
|
作者
Teraishi, Fuminori [1 ,2 ]
Yoshida, Yusuke [1 ]
Shoji, Ryohei [1 ]
Kanaya, Nobuhiko [1 ]
Matsumi, Yuki [1 ,2 ]
Shigeyasu, Kunitoshi [1 ]
Kondo, Yoshitaka [1 ]
Kagawa, Shunsuke [1 ]
Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Okayama Univ, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, 2-5-1 Shikata Cho,Kita Ku, Okayama 7008558, Japan
[2] Okayama Univ Hosp, Dept Minimally Invas Therapy Ctr, Okayama, Japan
关键词
Robot assisted surgery; older patients; rectal cancer; short - term outcome; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; OLDER;
D O I
10.21873/anticanres.17516
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background/Aim: The aging population challenges surgical management of rectal cancer. This study evaluated the short-term safety of robot-assisted rectal surgery (RARS) in patients aged 75 years and older, examining perioperative complications and surgical outcomes in this vulnerable population. Patients and Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at Okayama University Hospital from September 2020 to December 2024, including 109 patients undergoing RARS. Patients were divided into older (>= 75 years, n=19) and non-older (<75 years, n=90) groups. Surgical procedures utilized the da Vinci Xi system, with comprehensive assessment of perioperative characteristics and complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results: The older group demonstrated significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (89.5% >= 2 vs. 58.9% in non-older group, p=0.036). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the older group (8 vs. 18 cases, p=0.04), though severe complications were similar to those in the non-older group. Median postoperative hospital stay was longer in the older group (12 vs. 9 days, p=0.01), but this difference disappeared when excluding stoma cases. Critically, no postoperative mortality was observed within 30 days in either group. Conclusion: Robot-assisted rectal surgery appears safe for patients aged 75 years and older. While the older group experienced more complications, these were predominantly manageable. The findings suggest that careful patient selection and experienced surgical teams can successfully employ robotic techniques in older patients while maintaining oncological standards.
引用
收藏
页码:1291 / 1299
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robot-assisted lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with advanced rectal cancer: a single-center experience of 65 cases
    Eon Bin Kim
    Yong Sik Yoon
    Min Hyun Kim
    Young Il Kim
    Jong Lyul Lee
    Chan Wook Kim
    In Ja Park
    Seok-Byung Lim
    Chang Sik Yu
    Jin Cheon Kim
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 1697 - 1703
  • [22] Feasibility of robot-assisted surgery for defining circumferential resection margins for rectal cancer: a retrospective study
    Nakao, Toshihiro
    Shimada, Mitsuo
    Tokunaga, Takuya
    Nishi, Masaaki
    Kashihara, Hideya
    Takasu, Chie
    Wada, Yuma
    Yoshimoto, Toshiaki
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [23] Safety and Long-Term Effect Assessment of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Elderly Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A CHN Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Liu, Hengchang
    Li, Chunxiang
    Zhao, Zhixun
    Guan, Xu
    Yang, Ming
    Liu, Zheng
    Tang, Yuan
    Jiang, Zheng
    Wang, Xishan
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2020, 19
  • [24] Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy
    Park, Soo Yeun
    Choi, Gyu-Seog
    Park, Jun Seok
    Kim, Hye Jin
    Ryuk, Jong-Pil
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (01): : 48 - 55
  • [25] Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy
    Soo Yeun Park
    Gyu-Seog Choi
    Jun Seok Park
    Hye Jin Kim
    Jong-Pil Ryuk
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 48 - 55
  • [26] Short-term results after robot-assisted surgery for primary rectal cancers requiring beyond total mesorectal excision in multiple compartments
    Thorgersen, Ebbe B.
    Solbakken, Arne M.
    Strom, Tuva K.
    Goscinski, Mariusz
    Spasojevic, Milan
    Larsen, Stein G.
    Flatmark, Kjersti
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 113 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [27] Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center
    Tomohiro Yamaguchi
    Yusuke Kinugasa
    Akio Shiomi
    Hiroyuki Tomioka
    Hiroyasu Kagawa
    Yushi Yamakawa
    Surgery Today, 2016, 46 : 957 - 962
  • [28] Does the level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation affect short-term and long-term outcomes of patients with sigmoid colon cancer or rectal cancer? A single-center retrospective study
    Wang, Yawei
    Wang, Yan
    Zou, Liaonan
    Deng, Lingna
    Wu, Tianchong
    Liu, Linsen
    Jiang, Jiling
    An, Tailai
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [29] Long-term outcomes of upfront robotic rectal cancer surgery: a single-center, retrospective cohort study in Japan
    Kasai, Shunsuke
    Kagawa, Hiroyasu
    Shiomi, Akio
    Hino, Hitoshi
    Manabe, Shoichi
    Yamaoka, Yusuke
    Chen, Kai
    Nanishi, Kenji
    Maeda, Chikara
    Kinugasa, Yusuke
    SURGERY TODAY, 2023, 53 (9) : 1028 - 1037
  • [30] Short-term results of robot-assisted colorectal cancer surgery using Senhance Digital Laparoscopy System
    Sasaki, Megumi
    Hirano, Yasumitsu
    Yonezawa, Hiroki
    Shimamura, Satoshi
    Kataoka, Atsuko
    Fujii, Takatsugu
    Okazaki, Naoto
    Ishikawa, Shintaro
    Ishii, Toshimasa
    Deguchi, Katsuya
    Sato, Hiroshi
    Sakuramoto, Shinichi
    Okamoto, Kojun
    Koyama, Isamu
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2022, 15 (03) : 613 - 618