Generative AI in K12: Analytics from Early Adoption

被引:0
作者
Bolender, Brad [1 ]
Vispoel, Sara [1 ]
Converse, Geoff [2 ]
Koprowicz, Nick [1 ]
Song, Dan [2 ]
Osaro, Sarah [2 ]
机构
[1] Finetune Learning, Iowa City, IA 52245 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION AND PSYCHOLOGY-EPOD | 2024年 / 15卷
关键词
Generative AI; Assessment Development; Content Alignment; Educational Measurement;
D O I
10.21031/epod.1539710
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The integration of generative AI in K12 education and assessment development holds the potential to revolutionize instructional practices, assessment development, and content alignment. This article presents analytical insights and findings from early adoption studies utilizing AI-powered tools developed by Finetune-Generate and Catalog. Generate enhances the efficiency of assessment item development through customized natural language generation, producing high-quality, psychometrically valid items. Catalog intelligently tags and aligns educational content to various standards and frameworks, improving precision and reducing subjectivity. Through three comprehensive case studies, we explore the practical applications, benefits, and lessons learned from employing these AI systems in real-world educational settings. The purpose of this series of studies was to investigate the ways generative AI is currently being used in practical applications in test development to improve processes and products. The studies demonstrate significant reductions in time and costs, enhanced accuracy, and consistency in content alignment, and improved quality of educational and assessment materials. The findings underscore the substantial benefits and critical importance of customized AI systems, rigorous training for both AI models and users, and adopting appropriate evaluation metrics. With the use of off-the-shelf generative AI models expanding rapidly, it is vital that the effectiveness of AI systems that are highly customized through collaborations with measurement experts be presented, in order to maximize benefits and uphold the fundamental principles and best practices of test development.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 377
页数:17
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Attali Yigal, 2006, Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, V4, P3
  • [2] Bennett R.E., 2016, TECHNOLOGY TESTING I, P142, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9781315871493-8, DOI 10.4324/9781315871493]
  • [3] The Criticality of Implementing Principled Design When Using AI Technologies in Test Development
    Bolender, Brad
    Foster, Charles
    Vispoel, Sara
    [J]. LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT QUARTERLY, 2023, 20 (4-5) : 512 - 519
  • [4] The Eras and Trends of Automatic Short Answer Grading
    Burrows, Steven
    Gurevych, Iryna
    Stein, Benno
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, 2015, 25 (01) : 60 - 117
  • [5] Gierl M.J., 2013, Automatic Item Generation: Theory and Practice, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203803912
  • [6] Transforming Assessment: The Impacts and Implications of Large Language Models and Generative AI
    Hao, Jiangang
    von Davier, Alina A.
    Yaneva, Victoria
    Lottridge, Susan
    von Davier, Matthias
    Harris, Deborah J.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT-ISSUES AND PRACTICE, 2024, 43 (02) : 16 - 29
  • [7] Artificial Intelligence and Educational Measurement: Opportunities and Threats
    Ho, Andrew D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2024, 49 (05) : 715 - 722
  • [8] Developing valid assessments in the era of generative artificial intelligence
    Kaldaras, Leonora
    Akaeze, Hope O.
    Reckase, Mark D.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2024, 9
  • [9] Khan S., 2021, P INT C ED DAT MIN, P741
  • [10] LEVENSHT.VI, 1965, DOKL AKAD NAUK SSSR+, V163, P845