Choice of Machine Learning Models Is Important to Predict Post-Operative Infections in Surgical Patients

被引:1
作者
Heffernan, Addison [1 ]
Ganguli, Reetam [1 ]
Sears, Isaac [1 ]
Stephen, Andrew H. [1 ]
Heffernan, Daithi S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Trauma & Surg Crit Care, Providence, RI USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; machine learning; post-operative infections; predictive modeling; CAMPAIGN INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES; SEVERE SEPSIS; BIAS; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1089/sur.2024.288
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Surgical quality datasets are critical to decision-making tools including surgical infection (SI). Machine learning models (MLMs), a branch of artificial intelligence (AI), are increasingly being ingrained within surgical decision-making algorithms. However, given the unique and distinct functioning of individual models, not all models may be suitable for acutely ill surgical patients.Patients and Methods: This is a 5-year retrospective review of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) patients who underwent an operation. The data were reviewed for demographics, medical comorbidities, rates, and sites of infection. To generate the MLMs, data were imported into Python, and four common MLMs, extreme gradient boosting, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest, and logistic regression, as well as two novel models (flexible discriminant analysis and generalized additive model) and ensemble modeling, were generated to predict post-operative SIs. Outputs included area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) including recall curves.Results: Overall, 624,625 urgent and emergent NSQIP patients were included. The overall infection rate was 8.6%. Patients who sustained a post-operative infection were older, more likely geriatric, male, diabetic, had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were smokers, and were less likely White race. With respect to MLMs, all four MLMs had reasonable accuracy. However, a hierarchy of MLMs was noted with predictive abilities (XGB AUC = 0.85 and logistic regression = 0.82), wherein KNN has the lowest performance (AUC = 0.62). With respect to the ability to detect an infection, precision recall of XGB performed well (AUC = 0.73), whereas KNN performed poorly (AUC = 0.16).Conclusions: MLMs are not created nor function similarly. We identified differences with MLMs to predict post-operative infections in surgical patients. Before MLMs are incorporated into surgical decision making, it is critical that surgeons are at the fore of understanding the role and functioning of MLMs.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [11] Davenport Thomas, 2019, Future Healthc J, V6, P94, DOI 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94
  • [12] Interpreting area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
    de Hond, Anne A H
    Steyerberg, Ewout W
    van Calster, Ben
    [J]. The Lancet Digital Health, 2022, 4 (12):
  • [13] Machine Learning for the Developing World
    De-Arteaga, Maria
    Herlands, William
    Neill, Daniel B.
    Dubrawski, Artur
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 9 (02)
  • [14] Dellinger RP, 2013, INTENS CARE MED, V39, P165, DOI [10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8, 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af]
  • [15] Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review
    Dreiseitl, S
    Ohno-Machado, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2002, 35 (5-6) : 352 - 359
  • [16] Predictive modeling of bacterial infections and antibiotic therapy needs in critically ill adults
    Eickelberg, Garrett
    Sanchez-Pinto, L. Nelson
    Luo, Yuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2020, 109 (109)
  • [17] Machine learning prediction model for postoperative outcome after perforated appendicitis
    Eickhoff, Roman M.
    Bulla, Alwin
    Eickhoff, Simon B.
    Heise, Daniel
    Helmedag, Marius
    Kroh, Andreas
    Schmitz, Sophia M.
    Klink, Christian D.
    Neumann, Ulf P.
    Lambertz, Andreas
    [J]. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2022, 407 (02) : 789 - 795
  • [18] Validation of the Artificial Intelligence-Based Predictive Optimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) Calculator in Emergency General Surgery and Emergency Laparotomy Patients
    El Hechi, Majed W.
    Maurer, Lydia R.
    Levine, Jordan
    Zhuo, Daisy
    El Moheb, Mohamad
    Velmahos, George C.
    Dunn, Jack
    Bertsimas, Dimitris
    Kaafarani, Haytham M. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2021, 232 (06) : 912 - 919
  • [19] Evans L, 2021, INTENS CARE MED, V47, P1181, DOI [10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y, 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337]
  • [20] Fisher A., 2019, J Machine Learn Res: JMLR, P20