Choice of Machine Learning Models Is Important to Predict Post-Operative Infections in Surgical Patients

被引:1
作者
Heffernan, Addison [1 ]
Ganguli, Reetam [1 ]
Sears, Isaac [1 ]
Stephen, Andrew H. [1 ]
Heffernan, Daithi S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Trauma & Surg Crit Care, Providence, RI USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; machine learning; post-operative infections; predictive modeling; CAMPAIGN INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES; SEVERE SEPSIS; BIAS; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1089/sur.2024.288
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Surgical quality datasets are critical to decision-making tools including surgical infection (SI). Machine learning models (MLMs), a branch of artificial intelligence (AI), are increasingly being ingrained within surgical decision-making algorithms. However, given the unique and distinct functioning of individual models, not all models may be suitable for acutely ill surgical patients.Patients and Methods: This is a 5-year retrospective review of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) patients who underwent an operation. The data were reviewed for demographics, medical comorbidities, rates, and sites of infection. To generate the MLMs, data were imported into Python, and four common MLMs, extreme gradient boosting, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest, and logistic regression, as well as two novel models (flexible discriminant analysis and generalized additive model) and ensemble modeling, were generated to predict post-operative SIs. Outputs included area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) including recall curves.Results: Overall, 624,625 urgent and emergent NSQIP patients were included. The overall infection rate was 8.6%. Patients who sustained a post-operative infection were older, more likely geriatric, male, diabetic, had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were smokers, and were less likely White race. With respect to MLMs, all four MLMs had reasonable accuracy. However, a hierarchy of MLMs was noted with predictive abilities (XGB AUC = 0.85 and logistic regression = 0.82), wherein KNN has the lowest performance (AUC = 0.62). With respect to the ability to detect an infection, precision recall of XGB performed well (AUC = 0.73), whereas KNN performed poorly (AUC = 0.16).Conclusions: MLMs are not created nor function similarly. We identified differences with MLMs to predict post-operative infections in surgical patients. Before MLMs are incorporated into surgical decision making, it is critical that surgeons are at the fore of understanding the role and functioning of MLMs.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] ACS, 2024, ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
  • [2] A novel and simple machine learning algorithm for preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children
    Aydin, Emrah
    Turkmen, Inan Utku
    Namli, Gozde
    ozturk, Cigdem
    Esen, Ayse B.
    Eray, Y. Nur
    Eroglu, Egemen
    Akova, Fatih
    [J]. PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 36 (06) : 735 - 742
  • [3] Natural language processing with machine learning to predict outcomes after ovarian cancer surgery
    Barber, Emma L.
    Garg, Ravi
    Persenaire, Christianne
    Simon, Melissa
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 160 (01) : 182 - 186
  • [4] Racial Equity in Healthcare Machine Learning: Illustrating Bias in Models With Minimal Bias Mitigation
    Barton, Michael
    Hamza, Mahmoud
    Guevel, Borna
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [5] Surgical Risk Is Not Linear: Derivation and Validation of a Novel, User-friendly, and Machine-learning-based Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) Calculator
    Bertsimas, Dimitris
    Dunn, Jack
    Velmahos, George C.
    Kaafarani, Haytham M. A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 268 (04) : 574 - 583
  • [6] Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Survey
    Borisov, Vadim
    Leemann, Tobias
    Sessler, Kathrin
    Haug, Johannes
    Pawelczyk, Martin
    Kasneci, Gjergji
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2024, 35 (06) : 7499 - 7519
  • [7] Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Virtual Assistant and Large Language Models in Post-Operative Care
    Borna, Sahar
    Gomez-Cabello, Cesar A.
    Pressman, Sophia M.
    Haider, Syed Ali
    Sehgal, Ajai
    Leibovich, Bradley C.
    Cole, Dave
    Forte, Antonio Jorge
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATION IN HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION, 2024, 14 (05) : 1413 - 1424
  • [8] Implementing Machine Learning in Health Care - Addressing Ethical Challenges
    Char, Danton S.
    Shah, Nigam H.
    Magnus, David
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (11) : 981 - 983
  • [9] Development and validation of a practical machine learning model to predict sepsis after liver transplantation
    Chen, Chaojin
    Chen, Bingcheng
    Yang, Jing
    Li, Xiaoyue
    Peng, Xiaorong
    Feng, Yawei
    Guo, Rongchang
    Zou, Fengyuan
    Zhou, Shaoli
    Hei, Ziqing
    [J]. ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2023, 55 (01) : 624 - 633
  • [10] Ethical Machine Learning in Healthcare
    Chen, Irene Y.
    Pierson, Emma
    Rose, Sherri
    Joshi, Shalmali
    Ferryman, Kadija
    Ghassemi, Marzyeh
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOMEDICAL DATA SCIENCE, VOL 4, 2021, 4 : 123 - 144