Mandated Board Gender Diversity and ESG Performance: Evidence From the European "Women on Boards" Directive

被引:0
作者
Fernandez-Mendez, Carlos [1 ]
Pathan, Shams [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oviedo, Dept Adm Empresas, Oviedo, Spain
[2] Newcastle Univ, Business Sch, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
关键词
board gender diversity; board gender quotas; ESG; institutional context; sustainability; women directors; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING; GOVERNANCE; SUSTAINABILITY; MANAGEMENT; PREDICTORS; DEMOGRAPHY; COMPANIES; DYNAMICS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/csr.3147
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using the 2022 European Union (EU) "women on boards" directive as a backdrop, we examine its wealth impact on firms in reference to their sustainability scores. Our analysis shows that investors respond positively to the EU gender quota, with a stronger effect on firms with low ESG scores. Particularly, we find that the abnormal returns on the announcement day are 0.5% higher on average for firms with weaker ESG performance, suggesting they have more to gain from the EU quota regulation. Our results reveal also that investors' expectations about the impact of the EU gender quota on ESG performance and firm value vary with differences in the institutional context across European countries. We observe more positive response in countries with strong regulatory environment characterized by high regulatory quality and strong legal enforcement and also in countries aligned with gender equality and sustainability values.
引用
收藏
页码:3602 / 3620
页数:19
相关论文
共 96 条
[41]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SHAREHOLDER VALUE: AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE RISK MANAGEMENT HYPOTHESIS [J].
Godfrey, Paul C. ;
Merrill, Craig B. ;
Hansen, Jared M. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (04) :425-445
[42]   Do board gender quotas affect firm value? Evidence from California Senate Bill No. 826 [J].
Greene, Daniel ;
Intintoli, Vincent J. ;
Kahle, Kathleen M. .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 60
[43]   COGNITIVE FRAMES IN CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY: MANAGERIAL SENSEMAKING WITH PARADOXICAL AND BUSINESS CASE FRAMES [J].
Hahn, Tobias ;
Preuss, Lutz ;
Pinkse, Jonatan ;
Figge, Frank .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2014, 39 (04) :463-487
[44]   European firms' corporate biodiversity disclosures and board gender diversity from 2002 to 2016 [J].
Haque, Faizul ;
Jones, Michael John .
BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2020, 52 (02)
[45]   Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? [J].
Hillman, AJ ;
Cannella, AA ;
Harris, IC .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2002, 28 (06) :747-763
[46]  
Hillman AJ, 2007, ACAD MANAGE J, V50, P941
[47]   Environmental, social and governance (ESG) activity and firm performance: a review and consolidation [J].
Huang, Danny Z. X. .
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2021, 61 (01) :335-360
[48]  
Huse M., 2006, WOMEN MANAGEMENT REV, V21, P113, DOI [DOI 10.1108/09649420610650693, 10.1108/09649420610650693]
[49]   The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance [J].
Jehn, KA ;
Mannix, EA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 44 (02) :238-251
[50]   Do independent boards pay attention to corporate sustainability? Gender diversity can make a difference [J].
Kanadli, Sadi Bogac ;
Alawadi, Asma ;
Kakabadse, Nada ;
Zhang, Pingying .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2022, 22 (07) :1390-1404