Identifying Profiles of Parental Reflective Functioning in First-Time Parents and Associations with Parental Attachment and Infant Socioemotional Adjustment

被引:0
作者
Madsen, Eva Back
Egmose, Ida
Stuart, Anne Christine
Krogh, Marianne Thode
Wahl Haase, Tina
Karstoft, Karen-Inge
Vaever, Mette Skovgaard
机构
来源
PARENTING-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE | 2024年
关键词
SELF-REPORT; QUESTIONNAIRE; NUMBER; EXPERIENCES; VALIDATION; STRESS;
D O I
10.1080/15295192.2024.2423808
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Objective. Parental reflective functioning (PRF) consists of three dimensions using the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ): Pre-Mentalizing Modes, Certainty about Mental States, and Interest and Curiosity. Different types of mentalization, such as genuine mentalization, hypomentalization, and hypermentalization, have been hypothesized yet rarely empirically examined. This study aims to identify PRF profiles using latent profile analysis based on the infant version of the PRFQ completed 4 months postpartum. How profile membership was predicted by parental attachment and predictive of infant socioemotional adjustment was also examined. Design. The community sample consisted of 1,168 first-time mothers and 490 fathers responding to surveys 2, 4, and 11 months postpartum. Results. Three qualitatively different and meaningful PRF profiles for mothers/fathers were found: Moderately Low Certainty (51.1%/46.2%), Moderately High Certainty (46.5%/39.0%), and High Pre-Mentalizing (2.4%/2.8%). An additional profile was identified for fathers only: Moderate Interest (12.1%). Parental attachment predicted profile membership differently for mothers and fathers. Membership in High Moderately Certainty predicted better infant socioemotional adjustment compared to membership in any other profile, although for fathers this profile was not different from the High Pre-Mentalizing profile. Conclusions. Identifying PRF profiles enables the identification of subgroups of parents with specific deficits and strengths in PRF. Future research is needed to examine the replicability of the identified profiles and relevant connections to parent and child outcomes to identify at-risk and protective profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 181
页数:28
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   FACTOR-ANALYSIS AND AIC [J].
AKAIKE, H .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1987, 52 (03) :317-332
[2]   Convergent Validity of Three Measures of Reflective Function: Parent Development Interview, Parental Reflective Function Questionnaire, and Reflective Function Questionnaire [J].
Anis, Lubna ;
Perez, Grace ;
Benzies, Karen M. ;
Ewashen, Carol ;
Hart, Martha ;
Letourneau, Nicole .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, WILEY SER PROB STAT, DOI 10.1002/0471721182
[4]  
Asparouhov T., 2014, MPLUS WEB NOTES, V21, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/10705511.2014.915181
[5]   Auxiliary Variables in Mixture Modeling: Three-Step Approaches Using Mplus [J].
Asparouhov, Tihomir ;
Muthen, Bengt .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2014, 21 (03) :329-341
[6]   Robustness of Stepwise Latent Class Modeling With Continuous Distal Outcomes [J].
Bakk, Zsuzsa ;
Vermunt, Jeroen K. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2016, 23 (01) :20-31
[7]  
Bateman A., 2016, MENTALIZATION BASED
[8]  
Bateman A.W., 2012, HDB MENTALIZING MENT
[9]  
Bauer J., 2022, Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications and empirical illustrations, P243, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-08518-511, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_11, 10.1007/978-3-031-08518-511]
[10]   Social and Emotional Determinants of Parental Reflective Functioning in a Multinational Sample [J].
Bennett, Clair ;
Regan, Darcy ;
Dunsmore, Julie C. ;
King, Gabriella ;
Westrupp, Elizabeth M. .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 37 (06) :818-829