Institutional Environmental Impact on the Use of a Performance Measurement System: The Mediation Effect From Organizational Renewal

被引:0
作者
Ukko, Juhani [1 ]
Saunila, Minna [1 ]
Rantala, Tero [1 ]
Nasiri, Mina [1 ]
机构
[1] LUT Univ, Sch Engn Sci, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Lahti, Finland
来源
STRATEGIC CHANGE-BRIEFINGS IN ENTREPRENEURIAL FINANCE | 2025年
关键词
institutional environment; organizational renewal; performance measurement system; PMS; BUSINESS PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; NONRESPONSE; PERSPECTIVE; COMPLEXITY; FRAMEWORK; RESOURCE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1002/jsc.2652
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Institutional environment is affecting how organizations are managed and operations renewed, but their effect on PMSs is rarely investigated. This study investigates the relationship between companies' institutional environment, organizational renewal, and performance measurement systems (PMSs). The study aims to examine whether institutional environment affects the use of a PMS and whether organizational renewal facilitates the relationship. The empirical data for this study were gathered by utilizing a survey of a randomly selected sample targeted at small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Finland. The study found support for organizational renewal playing a mediating role in the relationship between company institutional environment and PMS use, and that companies' institutional environments alone do not contribute to the configuration of PMSs. The results not only add to evidence of institutional environments' effects on the use of PMSs within SMEs, but they also aid in understanding companies' own renewal activities.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Ahinful G. S., 2023, Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, V35, P362, DOI [10.1080/08276331.2021.1885247, DOI 10.1080/08276331.2021.1885247]
[2]   A decision theory perspective on complexity in performance measurement and management [J].
Alexander, Anthony ;
Kumar, Maneesh ;
Walker, Helen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 38 (11) :2214-2244
[3]  
Analoui F., 2002, J MANAG DEV, V21, P290, DOI DOI 10.1108/02621710210430281
[4]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[5]   How performance measurement influences stakeholders in not-for-profit organizations [J].
Beer, Haley Allison ;
Micheli, Pietro .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2017, 37 (09) :1164-1184
[6]   Performance Measurement: Challenges for Tomorrow* [J].
Bititci, Umit ;
Garengo, Patrizia ;
Doerfler, Viktor ;
Nudurupati, Sai .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2012, 14 (03) :305-327
[7]   Editorial: Towards a Theoretical Foundation for Performance Measurement and Management [J].
Bititci, Umit S. ;
Bourne, Michael ;
Cross, Jennifer A. ;
Nudurupati, Sai S. ;
Sang, Kate .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2018, 20 (03) :653-660
[8]   Value of maturity models in performance measurement [J].
Bititci, Umit S. ;
Garengo, Patrizia ;
Ates, Aylin ;
Nudurupati, Sai S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2015, 53 (10) :3062-3085
[9]   Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems [J].
Bourne, M ;
Mills, J ;
Wilcox, M ;
Neely, A ;
Platts, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2000, 20 (07) :754-771
[10]   Performance measurement and management: theory and practice [J].
Bourne, Mike ;
Melnyk, Steven ;
Bititci, Umit S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 38 (11) :2010-2021