Evaluating Segmentation-Based Deep Learning Models for Real-Time Electric Vehicle Fire Detection

被引:0
作者
Kwon, Heejun [1 ]
Choi, Sugi [1 ]
Woo, Wonmyung [2 ]
Jung, Haiyoung [1 ]
机构
[1] Semyung Univ, Dept Fire & Disaster Prevent, 65 Semyung Ro, Jecheon 27136, South Korea
[2] Inha Univ, Dept Elect Engn, 100 Inha Ro, Incheon 22212, South Korea
来源
FIRE-SWITZERLAND | 2025年 / 8卷 / 02期
关键词
electric vehicle; fire detection; YOLOv11-Seg; segmentation; object detection;
D O I
10.3390/fire8020066
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The rapid expansion of the electric vehicle (EV) market has raised significant safety concerns, particularly regarding fires caused by the thermal runaway of lithium-ion batteries. To address this issue, this study investigates the real-time fire detection performance of segmentation-based object detection models for EVs. The evaluated models include YOLOv5-Seg, YOLOv8-Seg, YOLOv11-Seg, Mask R-CNN, and Cascade Mask R-CNN. Performance is analyzed using metrics such as precision, recall, F1-score, mAP50, and FPS. The experimental results reveal that the YOLO-based models outperform Mask R-CNN and Cascade Mask R-CNN across all evaluation metrics. In particular, YOLOv11-Seg demonstrates superior accuracy in delineating fire and smoke boundaries, achieving minimal false positives and high reliability under diverse fire scenarios. Additionally, its real-time processing speed of 136.99 FPS validates its capability for rapid detection and response, even in complex fire environments. Conversely, Mask R-CNN and Cascade Mask R-CNN exhibit suboptimal performance in terms of precision, recall, and FPS, limiting their applicability to real-time fire detection systems. This study establishes YOLO-based segmentation models, particularly the advanced YOLOv11-Seg, as highly effective EV fire detection and response systems.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Challa R., Kamath D., Anctil A., Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US, J. Environ. Manag, 308, (2022)
  • [2] Qiao Q., Zhao F., Liu Z., He X., Hao H., Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of electric vehicles in China: Combining the vehicle cycle and fuel cycle, Energy, 177, pp. 222-233, (2019)
  • [3] Sun P., Bisschop R., Niu H., Huang X., A review of battery fires in electric vehicles, Fire Technol, 56, pp. 1361-1410, (2020)
  • [4] Dorsz A., Lewandowski M., Analysis of fire hazards associated with the operation of electric vehicles in enclosed structures, Energies, 15, (2021)
  • [5] Cui Y., Liu J., Cong B., Han X., Yin S., Characterization and assessment of fire evolution process of electric vehicles placed in parallel, Process Saf. Environ. Prot, 166, pp. 524-534, (2022)
  • [6] La Scala A., Loprieno P., Foti D., La Scala M., The mechanical response of structural elements in enclosed structures during electric vehicle fires: A computational study, Energies, 16, (2023)
  • [7] Kiasari M.M., Aly H.H., Enhancing Fire Protection in Electric Vehicle Batteries Based on Thermal Energy Storage Systems Using Machine Learning and Feature Engineering, Fire, 7, (2024)
  • [8] EV Fires
  • [9] Zhang S., Yang Q., Gao Y., Gao D., Real-time fire detection method for electric vehicle charging stations based on machine vision, World Electr. Veh. J, 13, (2022)
  • [10] Girshick R., Donahue J., Darrell T., Malik J., Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 580-587