Clinical factors influencing residual subcutaneous tissue after skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction

被引:0
|
作者
Turna, Menekse [1 ]
Caglar, Hale Basak [1 ]
机构
[1] Anadolu Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Kocaeli, Turkiye
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2025年 / 15卷
关键词
residual fibroglandular tissue; skin-sparing mastectomy; nipple-sparing mastectomy; breast reconstruction; postoperative radiotherapy; CONSERVING SURGERY; RECURRENCE RATES; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CANCER;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2025.1516479
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) have emerged as increasingly preferred alternatives to traditional mastectomy, largely due to their enhanced cosmetic outcomes and elevated levels of patient satisfaction. Nonetheless, the oncological safety and implications associated with residual breast tissue in these surgical procedures continue to raise significant concerns. The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of various clinical and surgical factors on residual subcutaneous tissue in patients undergoing SSM and NSM. Methods: This retrospective cohort study encompassed breast cancer patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy following SSM and NSM with immediate breast reconstruction from November 2020 to April 2024. Clinical and demographic data, including age, tumor size, axillary staging, molecular subtype, genetic analysis, and surgical details, were systematically collected. Additionally, radiation treatment planning CT scans were assessed to measure residual subcutaneous tissue thickness at multiple anatomical regions. The correlation between residual subcutaneous tissue thickness and clinical factors was subsequently analyzed. Results: The median age was 45 years (range, 31-61). Among the total patients, 20 underwent SSM (52.63%), and 18 underwent NSM (47.37%). An acceptable residual subcutaneous tissue distance (<= 5 mm) was observed in 21 breasts (55.26%), while 17 breasts (44.74%) did not meet this criterion. Analysis demonstrated a statistically significant but modest positive correlation between RFT thickness and age (r = 0.38, p = 0.02), minimal positive correlation was observed between RFT thickness and clinical tumor size (r = 0.08, p = 0.042). A significant effect of contralateral breast surgery on residual subcutaneous tissue thickness was noted (F = 8.38, p < 0.001). Additionally, the results also revealed a statistically significant inverse correlation between RFT thickness and axillary involvement (r = -0.18, p = 0.005), suggesting that thicker flaps are associated with reduced axillary involvement. There was no significant difference in RFT thickness between NSM and SSM groups (Chi(2) = 0.47, p = 0.491). Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients undergoing SSM and NSM exhibit residual subcutaneous tissue thickness that exceeds acceptable limits, which may vary based on clinical and pathological factors. Further research involving larger cohorts and prospective designs is essential to identify additional contributing factors and optimize indications for postoperative radiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Esthetic evaluation of immediate breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy
    Mori H.
    Umeda T.
    Osanai T.
    Hata Y.
    Breast Cancer, 2005, 12 (4) : 299 - 303
  • [2] Factors Predicting Locoregional Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Nipple-Sparing/Skin-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction
    Wu, Zhen-Yu
    Kim, Hee Jeong
    Lee, Jong Won
    Chung, Il Yong
    Kim, Jisun
    Lee, Sae Byul
    Son, Byung-Ho
    Eom, Jin Sup
    Jeong, Jae Ho
    Gong, Gyungyub
    Kim, Hak Hee
    Ahn, Sei-Hyun
    Ko, BeomSeok
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [3] Risk Factors for Complications after Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Paprottka, Felix J.
    Schlett, Christopher L.
    Luketina, Rosalia
    Paprottka, Karolin
    Klimas, Dalius
    Radtke, Christine
    Hebebrand, Detlev
    BREAST CARE, 2019, 14 (05) : 289 - 296
  • [4] Subcutaneous Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction
    Shi, Aiping
    Wu, Di
    Li, Xingliang
    Zhang, Shifu
    Li, Sijie
    Xu, Hui
    Xie, Huijun
    Fan, Zhimin
    BREAST CARE, 2012, 7 (02) : 131 - 136
  • [5] Immediate Prepectoral Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Is Equally Safe Following Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Henry, Nader
    Sebag, Victoria
    Safran, Tyler
    Viezel-Mathieu, Alex
    Dionisopoulos, Tassos
    Davison, Peter
    Vorstenbosch, Joshua
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 93 (02) : 172 - 177
  • [6] Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction
    Vlastos, Georges
    Elias, Badwi
    Meyer, Olna
    Harder, Yves
    Schaefer, Pierre
    Pittet, Brigitte
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2007, 94 (09) : 833 - 840
  • [7] Risk of Residual Breast Tissue after Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
    Dreadin, Julie
    Sarode, Venetia
    Saint-Cyr, Michel
    Hynan, Linda S.
    Rao, Roshni
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2012, 18 (03) : 248 - 252
  • [8] Comparative Study of Nipple–Areola Complex Position and Patient Satisfaction After Unilateral Mastectomy and Immediate Expander–Implant Reconstruction Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
    Hyungsuk Kim
    Sun-June Park
    Kyong-Je Woo
    Sa Ik Bang
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2019, 43 : 313 - 327
  • [9] Locoregional recurrence in skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomies
    Costeira, Beatriz
    da Silva, Francisca B.
    Oom, Rodrigo
    Costa, Cristina
    Moniz, Joao, V
    Abecasis, Nuno
    Santos, Catarina R.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 125 (03) : 352 - 360
  • [10] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Chen, Constance M.
    Disa, Joseph J.
    Sacchini, Virgilio
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Mehrara, Babak J.
    Garcia-Etienne, Carlos A.
    Cordeiro, Peter G.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 124 (06) : 1772 - 1780