Role of region-of-interest magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy in mitigating overtreatment of localized prostate cancer - A retrospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Carrie [1 ]
Trivedi, Purvish [2 ]
Katende, Esther [2 ]
Awasthi, Varun [3 ]
Smith, Riley [2 ]
Putney, Ryan [2 ]
Bondokji, Yahya [2 ]
Park, Jong Y. [2 ]
Dhillon, Jasreman [2 ]
Yamoah, Kosj [2 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Lebanon, NH USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Amity Univ, Noida, India
关键词
Prostate cancer; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Active surveillance; Region of interest; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; TARGETED BIOPSY; INGUINAL-HERNIA; LIFE OUTCOMES; RISK; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100642
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Traditional ultrasonography-based prostate biopsy uses a transrectal approach for systematic sampling of 12 cores. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion biopsy uses a targeted approach, first identifying regions of interest (ROI) clinically suspicious for prostate cancer (PCa) through MRI, before performing a prostate biopsy aided by ultrasonography. Methods: The single-center institutional retrospective cohort study used 442 men who were recommended for localized PCa management. Cohort A (n = 346) comprised patients who underwent MRI-guided TRUS biopsies, which included both standard 12-core TRUS biopsies and MRI-targeted biopsies performed simultaneously. Cohort B (n = 96) comprised patients who received only standard TRUS biopsy. The primary endpoint was Gleason reclassification, defined as the change in Gleason scores between standard TRUS and targeted region-ofinterest (ROI) biopsies among cohort A. Secondary endpoint assessed the role of ROI biopsies in mitigating overtreatment by analyzing the probability of undergoing treatment and the duration of active surveillance (AS). Results: Among men classified as no tumor on standard biopsy, 16.9 % showed Gleason disease on subsequent ROI biopsy. Additionally, ROI group also had a longer time to receive primary treatment (P = .017), as they were more likely to opt for AS (54 %). Lastly, median time spent on AS was longer for the ROI group compared with the non-ROI cohort (P = .002). Conclusion: Adding multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) biopsy to standard TRUS biopsy may increase the detection of PCa. Additionally, mpMRI may allow patients to remain safely on AS, thereby reducing the need of prostate biopsies and improving cost-effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prostate cancer upgrading with serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging and repeat biopsy in men on active surveillance: are confirmatory biopsies still necessary?
    Osses, Daniel F.
    Drost, Frank-Jan H.
    Verbeek, Jan F. M.
    Luiting, Henk B.
    Van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Krestin, Gabriel P.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 (01) : 124 - 132
  • [42] Detection of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography image-fusion targeted biopsy in African-American men
    Shin, Toshitaka
    Smyth, Thomas B.
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Ahmadi, Nariman
    Abreu, Andre Luis de Castro
    Oishi, Masakatsu
    Mimata, Hiromitsu
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 (02) : 233 - 238
  • [43] Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy in Patients with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Under Active Surveillance Undergoing Surveillance Biopsy
    Borkowetz, Angelika
    Renner, Theresa
    Platzek, Ivan
    Toma, Marieta
    Herout, Roman
    Baunacke, Martin
    Groeben, Christer
    Huber, Johannes
    Laniado, Michael
    Baretton, Gustavo B.
    Froehner, Michael
    Zastrow, Stefan
    Wirth, Manfred P.
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2018, 100 (02) : 155 - 163
  • [44] Magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Tyson, Mark D.
    Arora, Sandeep S.
    Scarpato, Kristen R.
    Barocas, Daniel
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (07) : 326 - 332
  • [45] Paradigm Shift in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Pre-Biopsy Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy
    Park, Jung Jae
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 23 (06) : 625 - 637
  • [46] The Contemporary Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
    Schulman, Ariel A.
    Sze, Christina
    Tsivian, Efrat
    Gupta, Rajan T.
    Moul, Judd W.
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2017, 18 (07)
  • [47] The Contemporary Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
    Ariel A. Schulman
    Christina Sze
    Efrat Tsivian
    Rajan T. Gupta
    Judd W. Moul
    Thomas J. Polascik
    Current Urology Reports, 2017, 18
  • [48] Evaluating the diagnostic role of in-bore magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy: a single-centre study
    Furrer, Marc A.
    Hong, Anne
    Wetherell, David
    Heinze, Stefan B.
    Simkin, Paul
    Chow, Ken
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Zargar, Homayoun
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 92 (06) : 1486 - 1491
  • [49] ROLE OF MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER ASSESSMENT
    Tomaskovic, Igor
    Knezevic, Matej
    Pezelj, Ivan
    Culo, Karolina Bolanca
    Novosel, Luka
    Nikles, Sven
    Tomic, Miroslav
    Justinic, Danijel
    Nincevic, Josip
    Pirsa, Matea
    Ruzic, Boris
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2018, 57 : 35 - 39
  • [50] The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer
    Thompson, James
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Frydenberg, Mark
    Thompson, Les
    Stricker, Phillip
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 112 : 6 - 20