Role of region-of-interest magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy in mitigating overtreatment of localized prostate cancer - A retrospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Carrie [1 ]
Trivedi, Purvish [2 ]
Katende, Esther [2 ]
Awasthi, Varun [3 ]
Smith, Riley [2 ]
Putney, Ryan [2 ]
Bondokji, Yahya [2 ]
Park, Jong Y. [2 ]
Dhillon, Jasreman [2 ]
Yamoah, Kosj [2 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Lebanon, NH USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Amity Univ, Noida, India
关键词
Prostate cancer; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Active surveillance; Region of interest; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; TARGETED BIOPSY; INGUINAL-HERNIA; LIFE OUTCOMES; RISK; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100642
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Traditional ultrasonography-based prostate biopsy uses a transrectal approach for systematic sampling of 12 cores. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion biopsy uses a targeted approach, first identifying regions of interest (ROI) clinically suspicious for prostate cancer (PCa) through MRI, before performing a prostate biopsy aided by ultrasonography. Methods: The single-center institutional retrospective cohort study used 442 men who were recommended for localized PCa management. Cohort A (n = 346) comprised patients who underwent MRI-guided TRUS biopsies, which included both standard 12-core TRUS biopsies and MRI-targeted biopsies performed simultaneously. Cohort B (n = 96) comprised patients who received only standard TRUS biopsy. The primary endpoint was Gleason reclassification, defined as the change in Gleason scores between standard TRUS and targeted region-ofinterest (ROI) biopsies among cohort A. Secondary endpoint assessed the role of ROI biopsies in mitigating overtreatment by analyzing the probability of undergoing treatment and the duration of active surveillance (AS). Results: Among men classified as no tumor on standard biopsy, 16.9 % showed Gleason disease on subsequent ROI biopsy. Additionally, ROI group also had a longer time to receive primary treatment (P = .017), as they were more likely to opt for AS (54 %). Lastly, median time spent on AS was longer for the ROI group compared with the non-ROI cohort (P = .002). Conclusion: Adding multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) biopsy to standard TRUS biopsy may increase the detection of PCa. Additionally, mpMRI may allow patients to remain safely on AS, thereby reducing the need of prostate biopsies and improving cost-effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Role of Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging before Confirmatory Biopsy in Assessing the Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression during Active Surveillance
    Salguero, Joseba
    Gomez-Gomez, Enrique
    Valero-Rosa, Jose
    Carrasco-Valiente, Julia
    Mesa, Juan
    Martin, Cristina
    Campos-Hernandez, Juan Pablo
    Rubio, Juan Manuel
    Lopez, Daniel
    Requena, Maria Jose
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (04) : 559 - 567
  • [32] Latest Evidence on the Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance for Insignificant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Cantiello, Francesco
    Manno, Stefano
    Russo, Giorgio I.
    Cimino, Sebastiano
    Privitera, Salvatore
    Morgia, Giuseppe
    Cicione, Antonio
    Damiano, Rocco
    ANTI-CANCER AGENTS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2018, 18 (07) : 925 - 930
  • [33] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: Current role in prostate cancer management
    Ueno, Yoshiko
    Tamada, Tsutomu
    Bist, Vipul
    Reinhold, Caroline
    Miyake, Hideaki
    Tanaka, Utaru
    Kitajima, Kazuhiro
    Sugimura, Kazuro
    Takahashi, Satoru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 (07) : 550 - 557
  • [34] Prostate cancer management choices in patients undergoing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsy compared to systematic biopsy
    Gordetsky, Jennifer B.
    Saylor, Benjamin
    Bae, Sejong
    Nix, Jeffrey W.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 36 (05) : 241.e7 - 241.e13
  • [35] Standardized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reporting Using the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation Criteria and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion with Transperineal Saturation Biopsy to Select Men on Active Surveillance
    Dieffenbacher, Svenja
    Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne
    Giganti, Francesco
    Bonekamp, David
    Kesch, Claudia
    Mueller-Wolf, Maya B.
    Schuetz, Viktoria
    Gasch, Claudia
    Hatiboglu, Gencay
    Hauffe, Marcus
    Stenzinger, Albrecht
    Duensing, Stefan
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (01): : 102 - 110
  • [36] Multicentre evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging supported transperineal prostate biopsy in biopsy-naive men with suspicion of prostate cancer
    Hansen, Nienke L.
    Barrett, Tristan
    Kesch, Claudia
    Pepdjonovic, Lana
    Bonekamp, David
    O'Sullivan, Richard
    Distler, Florian
    Warren, Anne
    Samel, Christina
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Grummet, Jeremy
    Kastner, Christof
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (01) : 40 - 49
  • [37] The role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review
    Alshehri, Sultan Zaher
    Alshahrani, Omar Safar
    Almsaoud, Nazal Ahmed
    Al-Ghamdi, Muhammad Ahmad
    Alqahtani, Abdulaziz Mohammed
    Almurayyi, Muath Mohammed
    Autwdi, Ali Salem
    Al-Ghamdi, Saeed Ahmed
    Zogan, Mohammed Mesadef
    Alamri, Abdulrahim Mohammed
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2020, 57 : 171 - 178
  • [38] Magnetic resonance imaging detection of prostate cancer in men with previous negative prostate biopsy
    Truong, Matthew
    Frye, Thomas P.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2017, 6 (03) : 424 - 431
  • [39] Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Targeted by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Fusion
    Dragoescu, Petru Octavian
    Drocas, Andrei Ioan
    Dragoescu, Alice Nicoleta
    Padureanu, Vlad
    Panus, Andrei
    Stanculescu, Andreea Doriana
    Radu, Mihai Alexandru
    Florescu, Lucian Mihai
    Gheonea, Ioana Andreea
    Mirea, Cecil
    Mitroi, George
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (08)
  • [40] COMPARISON OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND FUSION PROSTATE BIOPSY WITH STANDARD SYSTEMATIC BIOPSY: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
    Koparal, Murat Yavuz
    Bulut, Ender Cem
    Cetin, Serhat
    Cosar, Ugur
    Budak, Firat Caglar
    Ucar, Murat
    Tokgoz, Nil
    Senturk, Aykut Bugra
    Sen, Ilker
    Sozen, Tevfik Sinan
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2021, 74 (08): : 790 - 795