Spatial impact of environmental regulation on firm entry: Empirical evidence from Chinese firm registration data

被引:0
作者
Ding, Xinting [1 ]
Ren, Jifan [1 ]
Lu, Haiyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol Shenzhen, Sch Econ & Management, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulation; Firm entry; Spatial durbin model; Chinese economy; INNOVATION; POLLUTION; INVESTMENT; PRODUCTIVITY; PERFORMANCE; EMISSIONS; POLICY; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124164
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Facing severe environmental challenges and a rapidly changing economic landscape, it is important to deeply analyze the specific impact of environmental regulation on firm entry. This paper used data on enterprise registrations from 279 Chinese cities between 2007 and 2020. We employed spatial econometric models to study the spatial impact of environmental regulation on firm entry. The results show that environmental regulation has a significant direct inhibitory effect on firm entry, especially more pronounced for manufacturing firms. At the same time, environmental regulation also has spatial spillover effects, influencing firm entry decisions in neighboring areas. Furthermore, it is found that environmental regulation improves environmental quality, which in turn inhibits the entry of manufacturing firms while attracting service firms. Based on these findings, policymakers need to fully consider the impact of environmental regulations on the entry of manufacturing and service firms, as well as the spatial spillover effects on firm entry in neighboring areas. Moreover, environmental regulation policies should be adjusted according to the specific development situations of cities. This will help achieve a coordinated development of environmental protection and economic growth.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [11] Fiscal centralization and urban industrial pollution emissions reduction: Evidence from the vertical reform of environmental administrations in China
    Cheng, Yangyang
    Xu, Zhenhuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 347
  • [12] Stringent environmental regulation and inconsistent green innovation behavior: Evidence from air pollution prevention and control action plan in China
    Cheng, Yuanyuan
    Du, Kerui
    Yao, Xin
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 120
  • [13] Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D
    Cohen, WM
    Klepper, S
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1996, 78 (02) : 232 - 243
  • [14] DEAN TJ, 1995, ACAD MANAGE J, V38, P288, DOI 10.5465/256737
  • [15] Asymmetric impacts of foreign direct investment inflows, financial development, and social globalization on environmental pollution
    Deng, Qiu Shi
    Alvarado, Rafael
    Cuesta, Lizeth
    Tillaguango, Brayan
    Murshed, Muntasir
    Rehman, Abdul
    Isik, Cem
    Lopez-Sanchez, Michelle
    [J]. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2022, 76 : 236 - 251
  • [16] Energy price uncertainty, environmental policy, and firm investment: A dynamic modeling approach
    Deng, Zhengxing
    Hao, Yu
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 130
  • [17] High-income developing countries as pollution havens: Can financial development and environmental regulations make a difference?
    Destek, Mehmet Akif
    Yildirim, Metin
    Manga, Muge
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 436
  • [18] Dixit AvinashK., 1994, INVESTMENT UNCERTAIN, DOI [10.1515/9781400830176, DOI 10.1515/9781400830176]
  • [19] Can public environmental concern inhibit the market entry of polluting firms: Micro evidence from China
    Du, Weijian
    Li, Mengjie
    Fan, Yuhuan
    Liang, Sunfan
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 154
  • [20] Can environmental regulation promote high-quality economic development?: Evidence from China
    Du, Xuewen
    [J]. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2023, 80 : 1762 - 1771