Analytical Performance of a Novel Nanopore Sequencing for SARS-CoV-2 Genomic Surveillance

被引:0
作者
Maimaiti, Mulatijiang [1 ]
Kong, Lingjun [1 ]
Yu, Qi [1 ]
Wang, Ziyi [1 ]
Liu, Yiwei [1 ]
Yang, Chenglin [1 ]
Guo, Wenhu [2 ,3 ]
Jin, Lijun [4 ]
Yi, Jie [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Clin Lab, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Fuzhou Agenm Biotechnol Co Ltd, R&D Ctr, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Sch Med Technol & Engn, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Fuzhou JiAng Med Lab, Dept Bioinformat, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
accuracy; genome surveillance; nanopore sequencing; QNome; SARS-CoV-2; DISCOVERY;
D O I
10.1002/jmv.70108
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The genomic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 has served as a crucial tool for generating invaluable data that fulfils both epidemiological and clinical necessities. Long-read sequencing technology (e.g., ONT) has been widely used, providing a real-time and faster response when necessitated. A novel nanopore-based long-read sequencing platform named QNome nanopore has been successfully used for bacterial genome sequencing and assembly; however, its performance in the SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance is still lacking. Synthetic SARS-CoV-2 controls and 120 nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples that tested positive by real-time polymerase chain reaction were sequenced on both QNome and MGI platforms in parallel. The analytical performance of QNome was compared to the short-read sequencing on MGI. For the synthetic SARS-CoV-2 controls, despite the increased error rates observed in QNome nanopore sequencing reads, accurate consensus-level sequence determination was achieved with an average mapping quality score of approximately 60 (i.e., a mapping accuracy of 99.9999%). For the NPS samples, the average genomic coverage was 89.35% on the QNome nanopore platform compared with 90.39% for MGI. In addition, fewer consensus genomes from QNome were determined to be good by Nextclade compare with MGI (p < 0.05). A total of 9004 mutations were identified using QNome sequencing, with substitutions being the most prevalent, in contrast, 10 997 mutations were detected on MGI (p < 0.05). Furthermore, 23 large deletions (i.e., deletions >= 10 bp) were identified by QNome while 19/23 were supported by evidence from short-read sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the Pango lineage of consensus genomes for SARS-CoV-2 sequenced by QNome concorded 83.04% with MGI. QNome nanopore sequencing, though challenged by read quality and accuracy compared to MGI, is overcoming these issues through bioinformatics and computational advances. The advantage of structure variation (SV) detection capabilities and real-time data analysis renders it a promising alternative nanopore platform for the surveillance of the SARS-CoV-2.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [21] Comparative analysis of 7 short-read sequencing platforms using the Korean Reference Genome: MGI and Illumina sequencing benchmark for whole-genome sequencing
    Kim, Hak-Min
    Jeon, Sungwon
    Chung, Oksung
    Jun, Je Hoon
    Kim, Hui-Su
    Blazyte, Asta
    Lee, Hwang-Yeol
    Yu, Youngseok
    Cho, Yun Sung
    Bolser, Dan M.
    Bhak, Jong
    [J]. GIGASCIENCE, 2021, 10 (03):
  • [22] A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data
    Li, Heng
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 27 (21) : 2987 - 2993
  • [23] Li H, 2009, BIOINFORMATICS, V25, P1094, DOI [10.1093/bioinformatics/btp100, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324]
  • [24] Genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in Weihai, China, march 2022 to march 2023
    Li, Xiang
    Zhang, Yuwei
    Zhang, Jinbo
    Sui, Zongyan
    Qu, Xinyi
    Wang, Mingrui
    Miao, Tingting
    Li, Jizhao
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [25] Dynamic within-host cefiderocol heteroresistance caused by blaSHV-12 amplification in pandrug-resistant and hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 11
    Liu, Chao
    Yi, Juan
    Lu, Ming
    Yang, Ping
    Du, Chunjing
    Jiang, Fan
    Du, Pengcheng
    Shen, Ning
    [J]. DRUG RESISTANCE UPDATES, 2024, 73
  • [26] Dissemination of the mobilised RND efflux pump gene cluster tmexCD-toprJ among Klebsiella pneumoniae
    Liu, Chao
    Guo, Jun
    Lu, Ming
    Shen, Ning
    Du, Pengcheng
    [J]. LANCET MICROBE, 2023, 4 (03): : E135 - E135
  • [27] Assessment of two-pool multiplex long-amplicon nanopore sequencing of SARS-CoV-2
    Liu, Hongjie
    Li, Jinhui
    Lin, Yanfeng
    Bo, Xiaochen
    Song, Hongbin
    Li, Kuibiao
    Li, Peng
    Ni, Ming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2022, 94 (01) : 327 - 334
  • [28] A Tale of Two Cities: From Influenza HxNy to SARS-CoV-z
    Liu, William J.
    Liu, Shelan
    [J]. CHINA CDC WEEKLY, 2021, 3 (49): : 1052 - 1056
  • [29] Convincing the confidence to conquer COVID-19: From epidemiological intervention to laboratory investigation
    Liu, William J.
    Wu, Guizhen
    [J]. BIOSAFETY AND HEALTH, 2020, 2 (04) : 185 - 186
  • [30] Forced Degradation Studies to Identify Critical Process Parameters for the Purification of Infectious Measles Virus
    Loewe, Daniel
    Haeussler, Julian
    Grein, Tanja A.
    Dieken, Hauke
    Weidner, Tobias
    Salzig, Denise
    Czermak, Peter
    [J]. VIRUSES-BASEL, 2019, 11 (08):