Analytical Performance of a Novel Nanopore Sequencing for SARS-CoV-2 Genomic Surveillance

被引:0
作者
Maimaiti, Mulatijiang [1 ]
Kong, Lingjun [1 ]
Yu, Qi [1 ]
Wang, Ziyi [1 ]
Liu, Yiwei [1 ]
Yang, Chenglin [1 ]
Guo, Wenhu [2 ,3 ]
Jin, Lijun [4 ]
Yi, Jie [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Clin Lab, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Fuzhou Agenm Biotechnol Co Ltd, R&D Ctr, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Sch Med Technol & Engn, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Fuzhou JiAng Med Lab, Dept Bioinformat, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
accuracy; genome surveillance; nanopore sequencing; QNome; SARS-CoV-2; DISCOVERY;
D O I
10.1002/jmv.70108
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The genomic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 has served as a crucial tool for generating invaluable data that fulfils both epidemiological and clinical necessities. Long-read sequencing technology (e.g., ONT) has been widely used, providing a real-time and faster response when necessitated. A novel nanopore-based long-read sequencing platform named QNome nanopore has been successfully used for bacterial genome sequencing and assembly; however, its performance in the SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance is still lacking. Synthetic SARS-CoV-2 controls and 120 nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples that tested positive by real-time polymerase chain reaction were sequenced on both QNome and MGI platforms in parallel. The analytical performance of QNome was compared to the short-read sequencing on MGI. For the synthetic SARS-CoV-2 controls, despite the increased error rates observed in QNome nanopore sequencing reads, accurate consensus-level sequence determination was achieved with an average mapping quality score of approximately 60 (i.e., a mapping accuracy of 99.9999%). For the NPS samples, the average genomic coverage was 89.35% on the QNome nanopore platform compared with 90.39% for MGI. In addition, fewer consensus genomes from QNome were determined to be good by Nextclade compare with MGI (p < 0.05). A total of 9004 mutations were identified using QNome sequencing, with substitutions being the most prevalent, in contrast, 10 997 mutations were detected on MGI (p < 0.05). Furthermore, 23 large deletions (i.e., deletions >= 10 bp) were identified by QNome while 19/23 were supported by evidence from short-read sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the Pango lineage of consensus genomes for SARS-CoV-2 sequenced by QNome concorded 83.04% with MGI. QNome nanopore sequencing, though challenged by read quality and accuracy compared to MGI, is overcoming these issues through bioinformatics and computational advances. The advantage of structure variation (SV) detection capabilities and real-time data analysis renders it a promising alternative nanopore platform for the surveillance of the SARS-CoV-2.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Insertion-and-Deletion Mutations between the Genomes of SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and Bat Coronavirus RaTG13
    Akaishi, Tetsuya
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2022, 10 (03):
  • [2] Baker S. R., CovidInduced Economic Uncertainty
  • [3] SARS-CoV-2 Whole-Genome Sequencing Using Oxford Nanopore Technology for Variant Monitoring in Wastewaters
    Barbe, Laure
    Schaeffer, Julien
    Besnard, Alban
    Jousse, Sarah
    Wurtzer, Sebastien
    Moulin, Laurent
    Le Guyader, Francoise S.
    Desdouits, Marion
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [4] Impact of cobas PCR Media freezing on SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA integrity and whole genome sequencing analyses
    Benoit, Patrick
    Point, Floriane
    Gagnon, Simon
    Kaufmann, Daniel E.
    Tremblay, Cecile
    Harrigan, Richard Paul
    Hardy, Isabelle
    Coutlee, Francois
    Lapierre, Simon Grandjean
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 101 (04)
  • [5] SARS-CoV-2 Evolution: On the Sudden Appearance of the Omicron Variant COMMENT
    Berkhout, Ben
    Herrera-Carrillo, Elena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 2022, 96 (07)
  • [6] An optimized, amplicon-based approach for sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 from patient samples using COVIDSeq assay on Illumina MiSeq sequencing platforms
    Bhoyar, Rahul C.
    Senthivel, Vigneshwar
    Jolly, Bani
    Imran, Mohamed
    Jain, Abhinav
    Divakar, Mohit Kumar
    Scaria, Vinod
    Sivasubbu, Sridhar
    [J]. STAR PROTOCOLS, 2021, 2 (03):
  • [7] Analytical validity of nanopore sequencing for rapid SARS-CoV-2 genome analysis
    Bull, Rowena A.
    Adikari, Thiruni N.
    Ferguson, James M.
    Hammond, Jillian M.
    Stevanovski, Igor
    Beukers, Alicia G.
    Naing, Zin
    Yeang, Malinna
    Verich, Andrey
    Gamaarachchi, Hasindu
    Kim, Ki Wook
    Luciani, Fabio
    Stelzer-Braid, Sacha
    Eden, John-Sebastian
    Rawlinson, William D.
    van Hal, Sebastiaan J.
    Deveson, Ira W.
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [8] Identification of Genomic Variants of SARS-CoV-2 Using Nanopore Sequencing
    Capraru, Ionut Dragos
    Romanescu, Mirabela
    Anghel, Flavia Medana
    Oancea, Cristian
    Marian, Catalin
    Sirbu, Ioan Ovidiu
    Chis, Aimee Rodica
    Ciordas, Paula Diana
    [J]. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (12):
  • [9] Evaluation of next generation sequencing approaches for SARS-CoV-2
    Curini, Valentina
    Ancora, Massimo
    Jurisic, Lucija
    Di Lollo, Valeria
    Secondini, Barbara
    Mincarelli, Luana Fiorella
    Caporale, Marialuigia
    Puglia, Ilaria
    Di Gialleonardo, Luigina
    Mangone, Iolanda
    Di Domenico, Marco
    Di Pasquale, Adriano
    Lorusso, Alessio
    Marcacci, Maurilia
    Camma, Cesare
    [J]. HELIYON, 2023, 9 (11)
  • [10] Rapid and sensitive identification of omicron by variant-specific PCR and nanopore sequencing: paradigm for diagnostics of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants
    Dachert, Christopher
    Muenchhoff, Maximilian
    Graf, Alexander
    Autenrieth, Hanna
    Bender, Sabine
    Mairhofer, Helga
    Wratil, Paul R.
    Thieme, Susanne
    Krebs, Stefan
    Grzimek-Koschewa, Natascha
    Blum, Helmut
    Keppler, Oliver T.
    [J]. MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 211 (01) : 71 - 77