Hope, Optimism, and Expectations for the Political Future

被引:0
作者
Barnfield, Matthew [1 ]
Johns, Rob [2 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Polit & Int Relat, London, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Dept Polit & Int Relat, Southampton, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Optimism; Hope; Electoral expectations; Prospective evaluations; Wishful thinking; WISHFUL THINKING; SELF-EFFICACY; PREDICTIONS; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1007/s11109-025-10027-5
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Expectations of what the future holds are a significant driver of political behavior. It is therefore important to understand the sources of those expectations. In this paper, we explore the psychological dispositions driving positivity about the political future. We draw on psychologists' distinction between optimism-a dispositional belief that good things will happen, come what may-and hope-a trait of envisioning, pursuing and believing one's goals to be achievable. We assess pre-registered hypotheses about the distinct influences of optimism and hope on valence expectations-beliefs about whether there will be good or bad societal outcomes-and electoral expectations-beliefs about likely election outcomes-in a representative-sample survey experiment in the United Kingdom. We find that optimism drives positive valence expectations, but hope drives partisan electoral expectations. Indeed, partisan bias in electoral expectations is exhibited only by those scoring higher in hope. We show experimentally that positive information from polls and expert commentary dampens this impact of hope by raising the expectations of the otherwise unhopeful. Our findings suggest that so-called 'wishful thinking' about election outcomes might stem from a sense of agency around electoral politics, but that this sense of agency does not extend to how citizens envision society's prospects.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Great expectations: A meta-analytic examination of optimism and hope [J].
Alarcon, Gene M. ;
Bowling, Nathan A. ;
Khazon, Steven .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2013, 54 (07) :821-827
[2]   Endogenous economic voting: evidence from the 1997 British election [J].
Anderson, CJ ;
Mendes, SM ;
Tverdova, YV .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2004, 23 (04) :683-708
[3]  
Anderson CJ., 2005, Losers Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy, DOI [10.1093/0199276382.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/0199276382.001.0001]
[4]   CAN ACCURATE KNOWLEDGE REDUCE WISHFUL THINKING IN VOTERS PREDICTIONS OF ELECTION OUTCOMES [J].
BABAD, E .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 129 (03) :285-300
[5]  
Babad E, 1997, INT J PUBLIC OPIN R, V9, P105
[6]   FACTORS INFLUENCING WISHFUL THINKING AND PREDICTIONS OF ELECTION OUTCOMES [J].
BABAD, E ;
HILLS, M ;
ODRISCOLL, M .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 13 (04) :461-476
[7]   PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE HOPE SCALE - A CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS [J].
BABYAK, MA ;
SNYDER, CR ;
YOSHINOBU, L .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 1993, 27 (02) :154-169
[8]  
Bailey Thomas C., 2007, The Journal of Positive Psychology, V2, P168, DOI DOI 10.1080/17439760701409546
[9]   International optimism: Correlates and consequences of dispositional optimism across 61 countries [J].
Baranski, Erica ;
Sweeny, Kate ;
Gardiner, Gwendolyn ;
Funder, David C. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2021, 89 (02) :288-304
[10]   Momentum in the polls raises electoral expectations [J].
Barnfield, Matthew .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2023, 84