Reviewing the complexity of endogenous technological learning for energy system modeling

被引:4
作者
Behrens, Johannes [1 ,2 ]
Zeyen, Elisabeth [3 ]
Hoffmann, Maximilian [1 ]
Stolten, Detlef [1 ,2 ]
Weinand, Jann M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Climate & Energy Syst Julich Syst Anal ICE 2, Julich, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Fac Mech Engn, Chair Fuel Cells, D-52062 Aachen, Germany
[3] TU Berlin, Fac Proc Engn, Dept Digital Transformat Energy Syst, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
来源
ADVANCES IN APPLIED ENERGY | 2024年 / 16卷
关键词
Energy system model; Piecewise linear optimization; Complexity reduction; Technology progress; Experience curve; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; BENDERS DECOMPOSITION; PLANNING-MODEL; COST; OPTIMIZATION; UNCERTAINTY; GENERATION; EXPERIENCE; POLICY; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.adapen.2024.100192
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Energy system components like renewable energy technologies or electrolyzers are subject to decreasing investment costs driven by technological progress. Various methods have been developed in the literature to capture model-endogenous technological learning. This review demonstrates the non-linear relationship between investment costs and production volume, resulting in non-convex optimization problems and discuss concepts to account for technological progress. While iterative solution methods tend to find future energy system designs that rely on suboptimal technology mixes, exact solutions leading to global optimality are computationally demanding. Most studies omit important system aspects such as sector integration, or a detailed spatial, temporal, and technological resolution to maintain model solvability, which likewise distorts the impact of technological learning. This can be improved by the application of methods such as temporal or spatial aggregation, decomposition methods, or the clustering of technologies. This review reveals the potential of those methods and points out important considerations for integrating endogenous technological learning. We propose a more integrated approach to handle computational complexity when integrating technological learning, that aims to preserve the model's feasibility. Furthermore, we identify significant gaps in current modeling practices and suggest future research directions to enhance the accuracy and utility of energy system models.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 137 条
[1]   From hot rock to useful energy: A global estimate of enhanced geothermal systems potential [J].
Aghahosseini, Arman ;
Breyer, Christian .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 279
[2]  
Anandarajah G, 2015, Lecture Notes Energy, V30, P261
[3]   Decarbonising road transport with hydrogen and electricity: Long term global technology learning scenarios [J].
Anandarajah, Gabrial ;
McDowall, Will ;
Ekins, Paul .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (08) :3419-3432
[4]   eTransport: Investment planning in energy supply systems with multiple energy carriers [J].
Bakken, Bjorn H. ;
Skjelbred, Hans I. ;
Wolfgang, Ove .
ENERGY, 2007, 32 (09) :1676-1689
[5]   Economic modelling fit for the demands of energy decision makers [J].
Barbrook-Johnson, Pete ;
Mercure, Jean-Francois ;
Sharpe, Simon ;
Penasco, Cristina ;
Hepburn, Cameron ;
Anadon, Laura Diaz ;
Farmer, J. Doyne ;
Lenton, Timothy M. .
NATURE ENERGY, 2024, 9 (03) :229-231
[6]   Endogenizing R&D and market experience in the "bottom-up" energy-systems ERIS model [J].
Barreto, L ;
Kypreos, S .
TECHNOVATION, 2004, 24 (08) :615-629
[7]   Emissions trading and technology deployment in an energy-systems "bottom-up" model with technology learning [J].
Barreto, L ;
Kypreos, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 158 (01) :243-261
[8]  
Barreto L., 2002, International Journal of Global Energy Issues, V17, P189
[9]  
Barreto L, 2004, Int J Energy Technol Policy, V2, P70, DOI 10.1504/IJETP.2004.004588
[10]  
Barreto L, 2000, IJGEI, V14, P262, DOI 10.1504/IJGEI.2000.004428